Are Family Owners Willing to Risk “Rocking the Boat”? A Blended Socioemotional Wealth-Implicit Theory Framework

IF 9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Management Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1177/01492063241311865
Luis R. Gómez-Mejía, Francesco Chirico, Michael C. Withers, Geoffrey P. Martin, Robert M. Wiseman
{"title":"Are Family Owners Willing to Risk “Rocking the Boat”? A Blended Socioemotional Wealth-Implicit Theory Framework","authors":"Luis R. Gómez-Mejía, Francesco Chirico, Michael C. Withers, Geoffrey P. Martin, Robert M. Wiseman","doi":"10.1177/01492063241311865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We leverage research on socioemotional wealth (SEW) and implicit theories to develop a novel blended SEW-implicit theory framework that explains why some family firms are more risk seeking or more risk averse. According to implicit theory, individuals perceive reality through their interpretative cognitive filters. Those with an entity theory orientation see reality as relatively fixed or uncontrollable, while those with an incremental-implicit theory orientation tend to perceive reality as malleable and change as leading to positive outcomes. We theorize that family firms with high SEW intensity tend to adopt an entity orientation, whereas those with low SEW intensity tend to adopt an incremental orientation. Accordingly, we propose that the likelihood that family owners hold either orientation is shaped by organizational features associated with SEW intensity, namely (a) the salience of family versus business identity, (b) family founder imprinting, (c) generational stage, and (d) favorable path dependence. In turn, family owners with an entity orientation are less likely to take risks compared to family owners with an incremental orientation. Furthermore, we theorize that a firm’s performance hazard can shift family owners’ implicit orientation from entity-based to incremental and vice versa, thereby impacting their risk-taking behavior.","PeriodicalId":54212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241311865","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We leverage research on socioemotional wealth (SEW) and implicit theories to develop a novel blended SEW-implicit theory framework that explains why some family firms are more risk seeking or more risk averse. According to implicit theory, individuals perceive reality through their interpretative cognitive filters. Those with an entity theory orientation see reality as relatively fixed or uncontrollable, while those with an incremental-implicit theory orientation tend to perceive reality as malleable and change as leading to positive outcomes. We theorize that family firms with high SEW intensity tend to adopt an entity orientation, whereas those with low SEW intensity tend to adopt an incremental orientation. Accordingly, we propose that the likelihood that family owners hold either orientation is shaped by organizational features associated with SEW intensity, namely (a) the salience of family versus business identity, (b) family founder imprinting, (c) generational stage, and (d) favorable path dependence. In turn, family owners with an entity orientation are less likely to take risks compared to family owners with an incremental orientation. Furthermore, we theorize that a firm’s performance hazard can shift family owners’ implicit orientation from entity-based to incremental and vice versa, thereby impacting their risk-taking behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家族业主愿意冒险“摇船”吗?混合社会情感财富-内隐理论框架
我们利用社会情感财富(SEW)和内隐理论的研究,开发了一个新的混合SEW-内隐理论框架,解释了为什么一些家族企业更倾向于寻求风险或更倾向于规避风险。根据内隐理论,个体通过解释性认知过滤器感知现实。具有实体理论取向的人认为现实是相对固定或不可控的,而具有增量内隐理论取向的人则倾向于认为现实是可塑的,变化会导致积极的结果。研究发现,高企业创新强度的家族企业倾向于实体导向,而低企业创新强度的家族企业倾向于增量导向。因此,我们提出,家族所有者持有任何一种取向的可能性取决于与SEW强度相关的组织特征,即(a)家族与企业身份的显著性,(b)家族创始人印记,(c)代际阶段,以及(d)有利的路径依赖。反过来,与增量导向的家族所有者相比,实体导向的家族所有者更不可能承担风险。此外,我们认为企业绩效风险可以将家族所有者的内隐取向从实体导向转向增量导向,进而影响家族所有者的风险承担行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management (JOM) aims to publish rigorous empirical and theoretical research articles that significantly contribute to the field of management. It is particularly interested in papers that have a strong impact on the overall management discipline. JOM also encourages the submission of novel ideas and fresh perspectives on existing research. The journal covers a wide range of areas, including business strategy and policy, organizational behavior, human resource management, organizational theory, entrepreneurship, and research methods. It provides a platform for scholars to present their work on these topics and fosters intellectual discussion and exchange in these areas.
期刊最新文献
How Gender Diversity and Equality in R&D Departments Jointly Affect Firm-Level Innovation Through Innovation Capabilities A CEO-Driven Process Model of Firm Responsiveness to Secondary Stakeholder Demands: The Roles of CEO Values and Passion When Overconfident CEOs Deliver Higher Returns: Evidence From Acquisition Waves “I Hold On”: How Country Music Songwriters Cope With the Precarity of Craft Work Structural Choices at Alliance Formation: Accounting for Partner Asymmetry in Industry Distance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1