{"title":"Brass Phase Determining Selectivity in Urea Electrosynthesis from CO2 and Nitrate","authors":"Shengliang Zhai, Zheng Peng, Xiaokang Chen, Yi Tan, Yi-Fan Huang, Zhi Liu, Wei-Qiao Deng, Hao Wu","doi":"10.1021/acscatal.4c06348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urea synthesis using CO<sub>2</sub> and nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup>) co-electrolysis represents an alternative to the traditional thermochemical Bosch–Meiser protocol, although the yield rate remains low. The design of a bicomponent catalyst should prioritize because intermediates engaged in co-electrolysis are energetically favorable on distinct segments. Investigations into the component configuration at the atomic level are still lacking. Given the differences in activation kinetics and stoichiometry of CO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> needed for urea synthesis, we use two-phase CuZn alloys (known as brass) with varying atomic ratios and configurations to demonstrate the role of phase engineering in determining the urea selectivity via CO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> co-electrolysis. α-phase brass with an unbalanced CuZn atomic ratio and disordered atomic arrangement exhibits favored electronic structures with modest *NO<sub>2</sub> adsorption and facilitated *CO<sub>2</sub> activation, leading to efficient C–N coupling to form key *CO<sub>2</sub>NO<sub>2</sub> intermediates. In contrast, ordered intermetallic β-CuZn shows excessive *NO<sub>2</sub> adsorption, resulting in a further reduction. Accordingly, α-CuZn exhibits a high Faradaic efficiency of 28.7% and yield rate of 60.0 mmol h<sup>–1</sup> g<sup>–1</sup> in flow cells, outperforming that of β-CuZn. This study highlights the relevance of atomic scale and arrangement in co-electrolysis, which involves the coupling of distinct reaction kinetics and requires varied stoichiometry.","PeriodicalId":9,"journal":{"name":"ACS Catalysis ","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Catalysis ","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.4c06348","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Urea synthesis using CO2 and nitrate (NO3–) co-electrolysis represents an alternative to the traditional thermochemical Bosch–Meiser protocol, although the yield rate remains low. The design of a bicomponent catalyst should prioritize because intermediates engaged in co-electrolysis are energetically favorable on distinct segments. Investigations into the component configuration at the atomic level are still lacking. Given the differences in activation kinetics and stoichiometry of CO2 and NO3– needed for urea synthesis, we use two-phase CuZn alloys (known as brass) with varying atomic ratios and configurations to demonstrate the role of phase engineering in determining the urea selectivity via CO2 and NO3– co-electrolysis. α-phase brass with an unbalanced CuZn atomic ratio and disordered atomic arrangement exhibits favored electronic structures with modest *NO2 adsorption and facilitated *CO2 activation, leading to efficient C–N coupling to form key *CO2NO2 intermediates. In contrast, ordered intermetallic β-CuZn shows excessive *NO2 adsorption, resulting in a further reduction. Accordingly, α-CuZn exhibits a high Faradaic efficiency of 28.7% and yield rate of 60.0 mmol h–1 g–1 in flow cells, outperforming that of β-CuZn. This study highlights the relevance of atomic scale and arrangement in co-electrolysis, which involves the coupling of distinct reaction kinetics and requires varied stoichiometry.
期刊介绍:
ACS Catalysis is an esteemed journal that publishes original research in the fields of heterogeneous catalysis, molecular catalysis, and biocatalysis. It offers broad coverage across diverse areas such as life sciences, organometallics and synthesis, photochemistry and electrochemistry, drug discovery and synthesis, materials science, environmental protection, polymer discovery and synthesis, and energy and fuels.
The scope of the journal is to showcase innovative work in various aspects of catalysis. This includes new reactions and novel synthetic approaches utilizing known catalysts, the discovery or modification of new catalysts, elucidation of catalytic mechanisms through cutting-edge investigations, practical enhancements of existing processes, as well as conceptual advances in the field. Contributions to ACS Catalysis can encompass both experimental and theoretical research focused on catalytic molecules, macromolecules, and materials that exhibit catalytic turnover.