{"title":"Diverging energy horizons: Rethinking public resistance in the Danish renewable energy transition","authors":"Matti Weisdorf, Kasper Tang Vangkilde, Simon Lex","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article provides a new perspective on public resistance to renewable energy projects based on ethnographic fieldwork in Denmark. The Danish government's ambition of quadrupling renewable energy production by 2030 has faced substantial resistance, with concerns over insufficient local engagement in, and destructive environmental impacts of, renewable energy projects as frequent points of contention. To enhance our understanding of this resistance, we introduce the concept of “energy horizons,” which designates frameworks for perception, experiences, and expectations in the energy transition, conditioned by personal, cultural, and social histories. By elucidating differing interests and concerns while, at the same time, not rigidly equating these concerns with distinct groups of people, the concept a) enriches our understanding of how and why actors perceive uncertainties and potentials of renewable energy projects very differently, b) counteracts the idea that resistance and concerns belong unambiguously to certain individuals or groups, and c) illuminates the injustices entailed when certain horizons drown out others. Ultimately, the article emphasizes the necessity of recognizing and integrating diverse horizons through dialogue and collaboration, advocating for a “fusion of horizons” that supports mutual understanding and inclusive decision-making. Our perspective highlights the potential for reconciling the urgent need for large scale renewable energy production with the complexities of local community values and identities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103945"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962500026X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article provides a new perspective on public resistance to renewable energy projects based on ethnographic fieldwork in Denmark. The Danish government's ambition of quadrupling renewable energy production by 2030 has faced substantial resistance, with concerns over insufficient local engagement in, and destructive environmental impacts of, renewable energy projects as frequent points of contention. To enhance our understanding of this resistance, we introduce the concept of “energy horizons,” which designates frameworks for perception, experiences, and expectations in the energy transition, conditioned by personal, cultural, and social histories. By elucidating differing interests and concerns while, at the same time, not rigidly equating these concerns with distinct groups of people, the concept a) enriches our understanding of how and why actors perceive uncertainties and potentials of renewable energy projects very differently, b) counteracts the idea that resistance and concerns belong unambiguously to certain individuals or groups, and c) illuminates the injustices entailed when certain horizons drown out others. Ultimately, the article emphasizes the necessity of recognizing and integrating diverse horizons through dialogue and collaboration, advocating for a “fusion of horizons” that supports mutual understanding and inclusive decision-making. Our perspective highlights the potential for reconciling the urgent need for large scale renewable energy production with the complexities of local community values and identities.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.