Diverging energy horizons: Rethinking public resistance in the Danish renewable energy transition

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.103945
Matti Weisdorf, Kasper Tang Vangkilde, Simon Lex
{"title":"Diverging energy horizons: Rethinking public resistance in the Danish renewable energy transition","authors":"Matti Weisdorf,&nbsp;Kasper Tang Vangkilde,&nbsp;Simon Lex","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article provides a new perspective on public resistance to renewable energy projects based on ethnographic fieldwork in Denmark. The Danish government's ambition of quadrupling renewable energy production by 2030 has faced substantial resistance, with concerns over insufficient local engagement in, and destructive environmental impacts of, renewable energy projects as frequent points of contention. To enhance our understanding of this resistance, we introduce the concept of “energy horizons,” which designates frameworks for perception, experiences, and expectations in the energy transition, conditioned by personal, cultural, and social histories. By elucidating differing interests and concerns while, at the same time, not rigidly equating these concerns with distinct groups of people, the concept a) enriches our understanding of how and why actors perceive uncertainties and potentials of renewable energy projects very differently, b) counteracts the idea that resistance and concerns belong unambiguously to certain individuals or groups, and c) illuminates the injustices entailed when certain horizons drown out others. Ultimately, the article emphasizes the necessity of recognizing and integrating diverse horizons through dialogue and collaboration, advocating for a “fusion of horizons” that supports mutual understanding and inclusive decision-making. Our perspective highlights the potential for reconciling the urgent need for large scale renewable energy production with the complexities of local community values and identities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103945"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962500026X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article provides a new perspective on public resistance to renewable energy projects based on ethnographic fieldwork in Denmark. The Danish government's ambition of quadrupling renewable energy production by 2030 has faced substantial resistance, with concerns over insufficient local engagement in, and destructive environmental impacts of, renewable energy projects as frequent points of contention. To enhance our understanding of this resistance, we introduce the concept of “energy horizons,” which designates frameworks for perception, experiences, and expectations in the energy transition, conditioned by personal, cultural, and social histories. By elucidating differing interests and concerns while, at the same time, not rigidly equating these concerns with distinct groups of people, the concept a) enriches our understanding of how and why actors perceive uncertainties and potentials of renewable energy projects very differently, b) counteracts the idea that resistance and concerns belong unambiguously to certain individuals or groups, and c) illuminates the injustices entailed when certain horizons drown out others. Ultimately, the article emphasizes the necessity of recognizing and integrating diverse horizons through dialogue and collaboration, advocating for a “fusion of horizons” that supports mutual understanding and inclusive decision-making. Our perspective highlights the potential for reconciling the urgent need for large scale renewable energy production with the complexities of local community values and identities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
能源视野的分化:重新思考丹麦可再生能源转型中的公众阻力
这篇文章提供了一个新的视角,公众抵制可再生能源项目基于民族志田野调查在丹麦。丹麦政府到2030年将可再生能源产量翻两番的雄心壮志面临着巨大的阻力,人们担心地方参与不足,以及可再生能源项目对环境的破坏性影响经常成为争论的焦点。为了加强我们对这种阻力的理解,我们引入了“能量视界”的概念,它指定了受个人、文化和社会历史制约的能源转型中的感知、经验和期望的框架。通过阐明不同的利益和关注点,同时,不严格地将这些关注点与不同的人群等同起来,这个概念a)丰富了我们对行动者如何以及为什么对可再生能源项目的不确定性和潜力的理解非常不同,b)抵消了抵抗和关注明确属于某些个人或群体的想法,c)阐明了当某些视野淹没其他视野时所带来的不公正。最后,文章强调了通过对话与合作认识和整合不同视界的必要性,倡导“视界融合”,支持相互理解和包容性决策。我们的观点强调了协调大规模可再生能源生产的迫切需求与当地社区价值观和身份的复杂性的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Addressing “the ones behind”: Public responses to technologies and the role of responsibility Private sector agency in low-carbon transitions: Rethinking energy security through hybrid governance in the Global South Infrastructure failures and aging populations: Quantifying the spatial overlap of power outages and older adult vulnerability The efficiency divide: Housing constraints on energy-saving practices in Darwin, Australia From anti-reflexive politicization to anti-reflexive policies: The emergence of renewable exclusion zones in United States environmental policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1