{"title":"Facing a fossil free future through the past: The importance of history for understanding fossil fuel phaseouts","authors":"Lukas Slothuus","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study of policies limiting the production of fossil fuels must be appropriately historicised. Contextualising these policies within a longer-term historical and wider geopolitical perspective helps illuminate the political dynamics and trajectories that variably give rise to, or prevent, such supply-side policies. Attention to this longer history furthermore helps understand the origins of the long-standing, powerful resistance to moving away from producing fossil fuels and how it might be overcome. In this article, I make the case for historicising fossil fuel supply-side policies following broader moves toward historicising the climate crisis. I contribute both conceptually and methodologically to the emerging literature on fossil fuel supply-side policies and broader politics of energy and climate. I chart the limited short-term past and present scope of the academic literature on these policies. I outline the necessary resources and tools, conceptual and practical, for better incorporating a historical dimension, both temporally and geopolitically. These include archival research, analysis of historical policy documents, interviews to construct oral histories and testimonies, as well as engagement with the secondary history literature. I illustrate these points with reference to the prominent supply-side example of Denmark, the first significant oil and gas producer to implement a phaseout policy, before reflecting on how to apply these lessons of historicization to other examples.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103971"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000520","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The study of policies limiting the production of fossil fuels must be appropriately historicised. Contextualising these policies within a longer-term historical and wider geopolitical perspective helps illuminate the political dynamics and trajectories that variably give rise to, or prevent, such supply-side policies. Attention to this longer history furthermore helps understand the origins of the long-standing, powerful resistance to moving away from producing fossil fuels and how it might be overcome. In this article, I make the case for historicising fossil fuel supply-side policies following broader moves toward historicising the climate crisis. I contribute both conceptually and methodologically to the emerging literature on fossil fuel supply-side policies and broader politics of energy and climate. I chart the limited short-term past and present scope of the academic literature on these policies. I outline the necessary resources and tools, conceptual and practical, for better incorporating a historical dimension, both temporally and geopolitically. These include archival research, analysis of historical policy documents, interviews to construct oral histories and testimonies, as well as engagement with the secondary history literature. I illustrate these points with reference to the prominent supply-side example of Denmark, the first significant oil and gas producer to implement a phaseout policy, before reflecting on how to apply these lessons of historicization to other examples.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.