Complications after primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty: a matched cohort study

Abstract

Background

Patients who undergo total shoulder arthroplasty typically have excellent clinical outcomes, though some patients require revision shoulder arthroplasty to address complications such as infection, instability, and persistent pain. The purpose of this study was to compare the rates and types of complications, as well as patient-reported outcomes, following primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

Retrospective chart review was conducted for patients who underwent revision anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty between January 2015 and May 2021 (N = 152). A cohort of patients who underwent primary shoulder arthroplasty in the same period was generated by matching 1:1 for implant type (anatomic/reverse), age, and surgery date. Demographic data, patient-reported outcomes, surgical details, surgical complications, and reoperations were collected for both cohorts (N = 304). Chi-square, t-test, Fisher’s exact test, and Mann-Whitney test were used as appropriate.

Results

The revision cohort had a significantly higher rate of surgical complications than the primary cohort (N = 58, 38.2% vs. N = 22, 14.5%; P < .0001). The distribution of complication types differed significantly between the primary and revision cohorts (P = .018). Revision patients reported less improvement in Single-Assessment Numeric Evaluation score from baseline to 2-year follow-up compared to primary patients (postoperative and preoperative scores 33.9 ± 35.9 vs. 52.3 ± 32.5; P = .036). Patients in the primary cohort who underwent a previous shoulder surgery before their shoulder arthroplasty were more likely to experience complications than those who did not (P < .001). The most common surgical complications in the revision cohort were persistent pain (N = 20) and periprosthetic joint infection (N = 10), while the most common complications in the primary cohort were persistent pain (N = 6) and instability (N = 4). 63.6% of complications in primary patients and 55.2% of complications in revision patients necessitated reoperation. Total procedure time was higher on average in revision patients (120 ± 68 min) than primary patients (94 ± 31 min; P < .0001). Revision patients were more likely than primary patients to have had cemented humeral stems in their primary arthroplasty (P = .043).

Conclusion

Patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty are at an increased risk for subsequent surgical complications and worse clinical improvement compared to primary shoulder arthroplasty patients. The differing profiles of postoperative complication types following primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty should be considered when advising patients on the risks of surgery and creating preoperative surgical plans to minimize these risks.