Assessing barriers to meditation in patients with substance use disorder

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ctcp.2025.101957
Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer , A. Sarah Cohen , Audrey Lopez , Christine Bakos-Block , Alisha Campbell , Bhanumathi Gopal , Marylou Cardenas-Turanzas , Ashmita Poudel , Chelsea Ratcliff , Aila Malik , Radha Korupolu
{"title":"Assessing barriers to meditation in patients with substance use disorder","authors":"Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer ,&nbsp;A. Sarah Cohen ,&nbsp;Audrey Lopez ,&nbsp;Christine Bakos-Block ,&nbsp;Alisha Campbell ,&nbsp;Bhanumathi Gopal ,&nbsp;Marylou Cardenas-Turanzas ,&nbsp;Ashmita Poudel ,&nbsp;Chelsea Ratcliff ,&nbsp;Aila Malik ,&nbsp;Radha Korupolu","doi":"10.1016/j.ctcp.2025.101957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Individuals living with substance use disorder (SUD) often face unique challenges that can hinder their engagement in beneficial practices like meditation, which has been shown to support recovery and well-being. This study aimed to explore the perceived barriers to meditation with SUD, identify key obstacles, and inform future interventions that promote the adoption of a personal practice.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We conducted a cross-sectional analytic study with a convenience sample of participants attending a treatment center for SUD. Data collected included demographics, SUD history, health challenges, meditation knowledge, and previous meditation practice. Barriers to meditation were evaluated using the Determinants of Meditation Practice Inventory (DMPI) and its revised version, DMPI-R. Overall frequencies, proportions, and measures of central tendency were calculated. Participants currently practicing meditation were compared to those not meditating by using Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred sixteen individuals completed the survey. Survey respondents were an average of 45 years (standard deviation, SD, 11.46), majority female (67.0 %), and White (90.3 %). Only 28.7 % of respondents were informed of meditation by their healthcare provider, yet 81.7 % were interested in learning about meditation. Among survey respondents, “prayer is my form of meditation,” followed by “I can't stop my thoughts,” were most agreed upon.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Individuals living with SUD are interested in education on meditation techniques; however, additional research is needed to understand the determinants of meditation practice and discern the barriers that could help facilitate the adoption and long-term practice of this method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48752,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 101957"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388125000222","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Individuals living with substance use disorder (SUD) often face unique challenges that can hinder their engagement in beneficial practices like meditation, which has been shown to support recovery and well-being. This study aimed to explore the perceived barriers to meditation with SUD, identify key obstacles, and inform future interventions that promote the adoption of a personal practice.

Materials and methods

We conducted a cross-sectional analytic study with a convenience sample of participants attending a treatment center for SUD. Data collected included demographics, SUD history, health challenges, meditation knowledge, and previous meditation practice. Barriers to meditation were evaluated using the Determinants of Meditation Practice Inventory (DMPI) and its revised version, DMPI-R. Overall frequencies, proportions, and measures of central tendency were calculated. Participants currently practicing meditation were compared to those not meditating by using Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Results

One hundred sixteen individuals completed the survey. Survey respondents were an average of 45 years (standard deviation, SD, 11.46), majority female (67.0 %), and White (90.3 %). Only 28.7 % of respondents were informed of meditation by their healthcare provider, yet 81.7 % were interested in learning about meditation. Among survey respondents, “prayer is my form of meditation,” followed by “I can't stop my thoughts,” were most agreed upon.

Conclusion

Individuals living with SUD are interested in education on meditation techniques; however, additional research is needed to understand the determinants of meditation practice and discern the barriers that could help facilitate the adoption and long-term practice of this method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估物质使用障碍患者的冥想障碍
背景和目的患有物质使用障碍(SUD)的个体经常面临独特的挑战,这些挑战可能会阻碍他们参与冥想等有益的练习,而冥想已被证明有助于恢复和幸福。本研究旨在探索使用SUD进行冥想的感知障碍,确定主要障碍,并为未来的干预措施提供信息,以促进个人实践的采用。材料和方法我们对在SUD治疗中心就诊的参与者进行了一项横断面分析研究。收集的数据包括人口统计、SUD病史、健康挑战、冥想知识和以前的冥想练习。冥想障碍的评估采用冥想练习量表(DMPI)及其修订版DMPI- r。计算了总体频率、比例和集中趋势的度量。通过Fisher精确检验、学生t检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验,将正在进行冥想的参与者与未进行冥想的参与者进行比较。结果116人完成了调查。调查对象平均年龄45岁(标准差,SD, 11.46),以女性(67.0%)和白人(90.3%)居多。只有28.7%的受访者被他们的医疗保健提供者告知冥想,但81.7%的受访者有兴趣学习冥想。在调查对象中,“祈祷是我的冥想方式”,其次是“我无法停止我的想法”,这是最受欢迎的。结论:患有SUD的个体对冥想技术教育有兴趣;然而,需要更多的研究来了解冥想练习的决定因素,并辨别有助于促进这种方法的采用和长期练习的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
157
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice is an internationally refereed journal published to meet the broad ranging needs of the healthcare profession in the effective and professional integration of complementary therapies within clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice aims to provide rigorous peer reviewed papers addressing research, implementation of complementary therapies (CTs) in the clinical setting, legal and ethical concerns, evaluative accounts of therapy in practice, philosophical analysis of emergent social trends in CTs, excellence in clinical judgement, best practice, problem management, therapy information, policy development and management of change in order to promote safe and efficacious clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice welcomes and considers accounts of reflective practice.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of trunk exercises for improving balance and trunk control among patients with stroke in Bangladesh Editorial Board Acceptability and feasibility of two types of asynchronous online yoga interventions in adults with moderate-to-high stress Chinese patent medicine in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis Mechanisms of sustained mindfulness practice in stroke survivors: A critical realist secondary analysis of the HEADS: UP intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1