Smartphone hookup app use (e.g. Tinder) and college student's risky sexual behavior: A model including leisure boredom, sensation seeking, and the moderating role of gender

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108581
Andrew Lepp, Brian Yim, Jacob E. Barkley
{"title":"Smartphone hookup app use (e.g. Tinder) and college student's risky sexual behavior: A model including leisure boredom, sensation seeking, and the moderating role of gender","authors":"Andrew Lepp,&nbsp;Brian Yim,&nbsp;Jacob E. Barkley","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Smartphone hookup apps (e.g., Tinder) are popular among college students and used for a variety of purposes including to find a partner for casual sex. As such, previous research has linked college students’ hookup app use with various, often single item, measures of risky sexual behavior. The current study extended previous research by linking hookup app use with risky sexual behavior as assessed by multi-item scales developed specifically for college students. Furthermore, the current study tested these relationships within an integrated path model which simultaneously examined the potential contributions of leisure boredom, sensation seeking, and gender. A survey of valid and reliable scales was administered to a random sample of 410 US college students (females = 244; hookup app users = 173). Data was analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. Results revealed that hookup app use was significantly and positively related to all measures of risky sexual behavior and these relationships were not moderated by gender. Leisure boredom was a significant and positive predictor of hookup app use but for females only; sensation seeking was a significant and positive predictor of hookup app use for both males and females; additionally, sensation seeking predicted risky sexual behavior independent of app use but for females only. In summary, males and females may have different predictors of hookup app use; however, the associated risky sexual behaviors appear similar for males and females, and significantly riskier than for non-hookup app users. Results are explained within the context of the current literature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 108581"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225000287","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smartphone hookup apps (e.g., Tinder) are popular among college students and used for a variety of purposes including to find a partner for casual sex. As such, previous research has linked college students’ hookup app use with various, often single item, measures of risky sexual behavior. The current study extended previous research by linking hookup app use with risky sexual behavior as assessed by multi-item scales developed specifically for college students. Furthermore, the current study tested these relationships within an integrated path model which simultaneously examined the potential contributions of leisure boredom, sensation seeking, and gender. A survey of valid and reliable scales was administered to a random sample of 410 US college students (females = 244; hookup app users = 173). Data was analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. Results revealed that hookup app use was significantly and positively related to all measures of risky sexual behavior and these relationships were not moderated by gender. Leisure boredom was a significant and positive predictor of hookup app use but for females only; sensation seeking was a significant and positive predictor of hookup app use for both males and females; additionally, sensation seeking predicted risky sexual behavior independent of app use but for females only. In summary, males and females may have different predictors of hookup app use; however, the associated risky sexual behaviors appear similar for males and females, and significantly riskier than for non-hookup app users. Results are explained within the context of the current literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
Student perspectives on banning mobile phones in South Australian secondary schools: A large-scale qualitative analysis Balancing consistency and performance in edge-cloud transaction management Exploring the effect of AI warm response on consumer reuse intention in service failure The psychophysiology of Instagram – Brief bouts of Instagram use elicit appetitive arousal and attentional immersion followed by aversive arousal when use is stopped Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1