Metaverse policing: A systematic literature review of challenges and recommendations

IF 8.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108591
Milind Tiwari , You Zhou , Andrew Childs , Lennon Y.C. Chang , Jamie Ferrill
{"title":"Metaverse policing: A systematic literature review of challenges and recommendations","authors":"Milind Tiwari ,&nbsp;You Zhou ,&nbsp;Andrew Childs ,&nbsp;Lennon Y.C. Chang ,&nbsp;Jamie Ferrill","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The metaverse is an immersive, interoperable, and decentralized 3D online environment that contributes to the emergence of various metacrimes, presenting unique challenges for metaverse policing. Despite the boom of the metaverse, the existing scholarship on metaverse policing has been limited, disconnected, and disorganized. This study systematically reviews 32 selected studies applying PRISMA 2020 guidelines to establish a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and recommendations of metaverse policing. It identifies five salient challenges: lack of legislative and regulatory frameworks, avatar accountability and anonymity issues, limited metaverse understanding and inadequate policing capabilities, difficulties in evidence handling, privacy concerns, and ethical challenges. It also identifies four plausible recommendations: establishing clarity avatar governance, effectively managing privacy and security issues, improving investigative methodologies, and defining accounting and taxation protocols. The findings underscore the urgent need for comprehensive research in metaverse regulation and the development of evidence-based policies to create a secure and well-regulated metaverse environment that will address the unique challenges posed by metacrime. By providing a systematic analysis of metaverse challenges and recommendations, this study contributes to actionable insights for law enforcement agencies, and highlights areas for future research, including the need for legal frameworks, enhanced policing capabilities, and further empirical work to evaluate proposed solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 108591"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074756322500038X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The metaverse is an immersive, interoperable, and decentralized 3D online environment that contributes to the emergence of various metacrimes, presenting unique challenges for metaverse policing. Despite the boom of the metaverse, the existing scholarship on metaverse policing has been limited, disconnected, and disorganized. This study systematically reviews 32 selected studies applying PRISMA 2020 guidelines to establish a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and recommendations of metaverse policing. It identifies five salient challenges: lack of legislative and regulatory frameworks, avatar accountability and anonymity issues, limited metaverse understanding and inadequate policing capabilities, difficulties in evidence handling, privacy concerns, and ethical challenges. It also identifies four plausible recommendations: establishing clarity avatar governance, effectively managing privacy and security issues, improving investigative methodologies, and defining accounting and taxation protocols. The findings underscore the urgent need for comprehensive research in metaverse regulation and the development of evidence-based policies to create a secure and well-regulated metaverse environment that will address the unique challenges posed by metacrime. By providing a systematic analysis of metaverse challenges and recommendations, this study contributes to actionable insights for law enforcement agencies, and highlights areas for future research, including the need for legal frameworks, enhanced policing capabilities, and further empirical work to evaluate proposed solutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟世界警务:挑战和建议的系统文献综述
元世界是一个沉浸式的、可互操作的、分散的3D在线环境,它有助于各种元犯罪的出现,为元世界的警务提出了独特的挑战。尽管虚拟世界蓬勃发展,但现有的虚拟世界警务研究仍然是有限的、不连贯的、混乱的。本研究系统地回顾了32项选定的应用PRISMA 2020指南的研究,以建立对虚拟警务挑战和建议的全面理解。它确定了五个突出的挑战:缺乏立法和监管框架,化身问责制和匿名问题,有限的虚拟世界理解和不足的警务能力,证据处理困难,隐私问题和道德挑战。报告还提出了四项貌似合理的建议:建立清晰的化身治理、有效地管理隐私和安全问题、改进调查方法,以及定义会计和税收协议。研究结果强调,迫切需要对虚拟世界监管进行全面研究,并制定基于证据的政策,以创造一个安全、监管良好的虚拟世界环境,以应对虚拟世界犯罪带来的独特挑战。通过对虚拟现实挑战和建议的系统分析,本研究为执法机构提供了可操作的见解,并突出了未来研究的领域,包括对法律框架的需求、加强警务能力以及进一步的实证工作来评估拟议的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board From iron to diamond: Collaborative behavior development across competitive tiers in League of Legends User cognitive fit in human-AI interaction: Exploring the link between input representation and generative output complexity Training and oversight of algorithms in social decision-making: Algorithms with prescribed selfish defaults breed selfish decisions Evaluating human-based and large language model-based content analysis: A case study on negative word-of-mouth classification in social media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1