Are social norms an obstacle to honest behavior? Theory and experimental evidence

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Asian Economics Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101875
Keisaku Higashida , Yuki Higuchi , Mohammad Mosharraf Hossain , Mohammad Sujauddin , Ryo Takahashi , Kenta Tanaka
{"title":"Are social norms an obstacle to honest behavior? Theory and experimental evidence","authors":"Keisaku Higashida ,&nbsp;Yuki Higuchi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Mosharraf Hossain ,&nbsp;Mohammad Sujauddin ,&nbsp;Ryo Takahashi ,&nbsp;Kenta Tanaka","doi":"10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study theoretically and experimentally investigates the effects of intrinsic dishonesty costs and other-regarding preferences reflecting social norms on honest behavior when people have the opportunity to act collaboratively and conduct mutual monitoring. We set up a theoretical model to clarify this effect and, then, report the results of a series of lab-in-the-field experiments conducted in two communities of Bangladesh, villages in the Chittagong Hill Tracts and the University of Chittagong. The participants played a trust game and a confidential die-roll game. Our experimental results show that mutual monitoring helped to increase honest behavior in both the traditional and university communities, but worked more effectively in the latter compared to the former. As predicted by our theoretical model, other-regarding preferences worked differently by significantly discouraging honest behavior among the community leaders but encouraging honest behavior among the students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Economics","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 101875"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049007824001702","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study theoretically and experimentally investigates the effects of intrinsic dishonesty costs and other-regarding preferences reflecting social norms on honest behavior when people have the opportunity to act collaboratively and conduct mutual monitoring. We set up a theoretical model to clarify this effect and, then, report the results of a series of lab-in-the-field experiments conducted in two communities of Bangladesh, villages in the Chittagong Hill Tracts and the University of Chittagong. The participants played a trust game and a confidential die-roll game. Our experimental results show that mutual monitoring helped to increase honest behavior in both the traditional and university communities, but worked more effectively in the latter compared to the former. As predicted by our theoretical model, other-regarding preferences worked differently by significantly discouraging honest behavior among the community leaders but encouraging honest behavior among the students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会规范是诚实行为的障碍吗?理论与实验证据
本研究从理论和实验两方面探讨了当人们有机会协同行动和进行相互监督时,内在不诚实成本和反映社会规范的他人偏好对诚实行为的影响。我们建立了一个理论模型来澄清这种影响,然后报告了在孟加拉国两个社区、吉大港山区的村庄和吉大港大学进行的一系列实验室现场实验的结果。参与者玩了一个信任游戏和一个保密的掷骰子游戏。我们的实验结果表明,相互监督有助于提高传统社区和大学社区的诚实行为,但后者比前者更有效。正如我们的理论模型所预测的那样,与他人相关的偏好会显著阻碍社区领导的诚实行为,而鼓励学生的诚实行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Asian Economics provides a forum for publication of increasingly growing research in Asian economic studies and a unique forum for continental Asian economic studies with focus on (i) special studies in adaptive innovation paradigms in Asian economic regimes, (ii) studies relative to unique dimensions of Asian economic development paradigm, as they are investigated by researchers, (iii) comparative studies of development paradigms in other developing continents, Latin America and Africa, (iv) the emerging new pattern of comparative advantages between Asian countries and the United States and North America.
期刊最新文献
The cancellation risk of China's life insurance industry and its impact on the market Food circulation systems and economic growth: Transmission mechanisms and regional heterogeneity in China Spillover effect of tax enforcement: Evidence from China Growth matters, but so does its composition: An empirical study on India's multidimensional poverty, 1995–2021 Study on the effect of extreme weather on bank credit risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1