Commissioning small fields in lung using Monte Carlo corrected film measurements

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104909
Jessica Lye , Guangli Song , Maddison Shaw , Brendan Healy , Nikki Caswell
{"title":"Commissioning small fields in lung using Monte Carlo corrected film measurements","authors":"Jessica Lye ,&nbsp;Guangli Song ,&nbsp;Maddison Shaw ,&nbsp;Brendan Healy ,&nbsp;Nikki Caswell","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Current commissioning of radiotherapy treatment planning systems with heterogeneous phantoms generally measures the dose delivered in solid water downstream of the lung material. The dose delivered directly in lung material is important to characterise the uncertainty of lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatments, but film measurements require a correction to accurately measure dose to lung.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Monte Carlo (MC) modelled corrections were applied to film measurements used for commissioning of lung SBRT. Medium dependent correction factors, k<sub>med</sub>, were established using 6 and 10 MV simulations to account for film being calibrated in water but measuring in regions of lung material. The correction factors are dependent on energy, field size, and position. To avoid the onerous requirement of modelling each individual beam to correctly match penumbra an alternative approach is presented where the correction is applied as a function of isodose level for a nominal field size.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Improvement in central axis dose agreements was seen for all field sizes, with the largest improvement of 7 % observed for 6MV 1 × 1 cm<sup>2</sup> field. Application of position dependent corrections improved the percentage of points passing a 5 %/1 mm or 3 %/1 mm gamma assessment in all cases, whilst a uniform central axis correction did not improve the passing rate in most cases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MC simulations provide a method for correcting dose measured in lung materials allowing more accurate comparison with treatment planning system doses. In this work a generic approach to correct small field film lung measurements as a function of isodose levels is presented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 104909"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725000195","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Current commissioning of radiotherapy treatment planning systems with heterogeneous phantoms generally measures the dose delivered in solid water downstream of the lung material. The dose delivered directly in lung material is important to characterise the uncertainty of lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatments, but film measurements require a correction to accurately measure dose to lung.

Methods

Monte Carlo (MC) modelled corrections were applied to film measurements used for commissioning of lung SBRT. Medium dependent correction factors, kmed, were established using 6 and 10 MV simulations to account for film being calibrated in water but measuring in regions of lung material. The correction factors are dependent on energy, field size, and position. To avoid the onerous requirement of modelling each individual beam to correctly match penumbra an alternative approach is presented where the correction is applied as a function of isodose level for a nominal field size.

Results

Improvement in central axis dose agreements was seen for all field sizes, with the largest improvement of 7 % observed for 6MV 1 × 1 cm2 field. Application of position dependent corrections improved the percentage of points passing a 5 %/1 mm or 3 %/1 mm gamma assessment in all cases, whilst a uniform central axis correction did not improve the passing rate in most cases.

Conclusions

MC simulations provide a method for correcting dose measured in lung materials allowing more accurate comparison with treatment planning system doses. In this work a generic approach to correct small field film lung measurements as a function of isodose levels is presented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
期刊最新文献
Improved stoichiometric model for megavoltage computed tomography number conversion and dose calculation within the TomoTherapy delivery system Radiopharmaceutical imaging of phantoms and patients with MACACO III Compton camera Stereotactic and fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for single and multiple brain metastases: Results of multicenter planning studies An explainable and comprehensive BI-RADS assisted diagnosis pipeline for mammograms Corrigendum to “Mechanistic DNA damage simulations in Geant4-DNA part 2: Electron and proton damage in a bacterial cell” [Phys. Medica 48 (2018) 146–155]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1