Pub Date : 2024-09-27DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104820
Background
Recent studies suggest strong correlations between Biologically Effective Doses (BED) and single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery treatment outcomes, as demonstrated for vestibular schwannomas (VS), arterio-venous malformations and pituitary adenomas. The BEDs calculated in these studies consider an uniform dose delivery where the spatio-temporal aspects of dose delivery were neglected.
Purpose
The aim of the study is to quantify the discrepancies between the BED values calculated with a simplified model of uniform dose delivery against the more complex model that incorporates the temporo-spatial incrementation of dose delivery and the bi-exponential effect of the sub-lethal damage repair.
Methods
A software tool that computes the BED distributions based on individual isocenter dose matrices extracted from the GammaPlan (Elekta) treatment planning was developed. Two cohorts 5 VS and 5 jugular foramen schwannoma cases of various tumor volumes and isocenter number were utilized to benchmark the method. Their BEDs covering 98% of tumor volumes were compared against those determined with the uniform delivery model.
Results
The BEDs covering 98% of the tumor volumes as calculated with both models show an approximately linear dependency with the treatment time. For all studied cases, the uniform delivery model overestimates the BEDs calculated with the full spatio-temporal delivery model. This discrepancy seems to accentuate with the tumor volume and treatment complexity.
Conclusions
Despite their resemblance, the BED distributions provide a plethora of BED measures more suitable to characterize clinical outcomes than the unique peripheral BED value calculated with the simplified model of uniform dose delivery.
背景最近的研究表明,生物有效剂量(BED)与单次分量立体定向放射外科治疗效果之间存在密切联系,前庭裂隙瘤(VS)、动静脉畸形和垂体腺瘤的治疗效果就证明了这一点。目的 本研究的目的是量化均匀剂量投放简化模型与包含剂量投放的时空递增和亚致死损伤修复的双指数效应的更复杂模型所计算出的 BED 值之间的差异。方法 开发了一种软件工具,可根据从 GammaPlan(Elekta)治疗计划中提取的单个等中心剂量矩阵计算 BED 分布。利用两组不同肿瘤体积和等中心数的 5 个 VS 和 5 个颈静脉裂孔型耳鸣瘤病例来对该方法进行基准测试。结果两种模型计算出的覆盖 98% 肿瘤体积的 BED 与治疗时间呈近似线性关系。在所有研究病例中,均匀给药模型都高估了全时空给药模型计算出的 BED。结论尽管 BED 分布与均匀剂量给药简化模型相似,但它们提供的大量 BED 测量值比用均匀剂量给药简化模型计算的唯一外围 BED 值更适合描述临床结果。
{"title":"Comparison of two biologically effective dose calculation models applied to single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104820","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104820","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Recent studies suggest strong correlations between Biologically Effective Doses (BED) and single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery treatment outcomes, as demonstrated for vestibular schwannomas (VS), arterio-venous malformations and pituitary adenomas. The BEDs calculated in these studies consider an uniform dose delivery where the spatio-temporal aspects of dose delivery were neglected.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The aim of the study is to quantify the discrepancies between the BED values calculated with a simplified model of uniform dose delivery against the more complex model that incorporates the temporo-spatial incrementation of dose delivery and the bi-exponential effect of the sub-lethal damage repair.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A software tool that computes the BED distributions based on individual isocenter dose matrices extracted from the GammaPlan (Elekta) treatment planning was developed. Two cohorts 5 VS and 5 jugular foramen schwannoma cases of various tumor volumes and isocenter number were utilized to benchmark the method. Their BEDs covering 98% of tumor volumes were compared against those determined with the uniform delivery model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The BEDs covering 98% of the tumor volumes as calculated with both models show an approximately linear dependency with the treatment time. For all studied cases, the uniform delivery model overestimates the BEDs calculated with the full spatio-temporal delivery model. This discrepancy seems to accentuate with the tumor volume and treatment complexity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite their resemblance, the BED distributions provide a plethora of BED measures more suitable to characterize clinical outcomes than the unique peripheral BED value calculated with the simplified model of uniform dose delivery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142328351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-26DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104823
Purpose
Lattice radiotherapy (LRT) is a three dimensional (3D) implementation of spatially fractionated radiation therapy, based on regular spatial distribution of high dose spheres (vertices) inside the target. Due to tumour shape heterogeneity, finding the best lattice arrangement is not trivial.
The aim of this study was to develop the LatticeOpt tool to generate the best lattice structures on clinical cases for treatment planning.
Methods
Developed in MATLAB, LatticeOpt finds the 3D-spatial configurations that maximize the number of vertices within the gross target volume (GTV). If organs at risk (OARs) are considered, it chooses the solution that minimizes the overlapping volume histograms (OVH). Otherwise, the lattice structure with the minimum Hausdorff distance between vertices and GTV boundary is chosen to avoid unpopulated regions.
Different lattice structures were created for 20 patients, with (OVHopt) and without (OVHunopt) OVH minimization. Imported into TPS (Eclipse, Varian), corresponding plans were generated and evaluated in terms of OAR mean and maximum doses, GTV vertex coverage and dose gradients, as well as pre-clinical plan dosimetry.
Results
Plans based on an optimized lattice structure (OVHopt, OVHunopt) had similar dose distributions in terms of vertex coverage and gradient index score. OAR sparing was observed in all patients, with a 4 % and 9 % difference for mean and max dose (both p-values <0.01), respectively. The best vertices dimensions and their relative distances were patient dependent.
Conclusions
LatticeOpt was able to reduce the time-consuming procedures of LRT, as well as to achieve standardized and reproducible results, useful for multicentre studies.
{"title":"LatticeOpt: An automatic tool for planning optimisation of spatially fractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104823","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104823","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Lattice radiotherapy (LRT) is a three dimensional (3D) implementation of spatially fractionated radiation therapy, based on regular spatial distribution of high dose spheres (vertices) inside the target. Due to tumour shape heterogeneity, finding the best lattice arrangement is not trivial.</div><div>The aim of this study was to develop the LatticeOpt tool to generate the best lattice structures on clinical cases for treatment planning.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Developed in MATLAB, LatticeOpt finds the 3D-spatial configurations that maximize the number of vertices within the gross target volume (GTV). If organs at risk (OARs) are considered, it chooses the solution that minimizes the overlapping volume histograms (OVH). Otherwise, the lattice structure with the minimum Hausdorff distance between vertices and GTV boundary is chosen to avoid unpopulated regions.</div><div>Different lattice structures were created for 20 patients, with (OVHopt) and without (OVHunopt) OVH minimization. Imported into TPS (Eclipse, Varian), corresponding plans were generated and evaluated in terms of OAR mean and maximum doses, GTV vertex coverage and dose gradients, as well as pre-clinical plan dosimetry.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Plans based on an optimized lattice structure (OVHopt, OVHunopt) had similar dose distributions in terms of vertex coverage and gradient index score. OAR sparing was observed in all patients, with a 4 % and 9 % difference for mean and max dose (both p-values <0.01), respectively. The best vertices dimensions and their relative distances were patient dependent.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LatticeOpt was able to reduce the time-consuming procedures of LRT, as well as to achieve standardized and reproducible results, useful for multicentre studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142323358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-26DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104819
Purpose
This research aims to develop an advanced mathematical model using a CT calibration phantom to accurately estimate the CT energy spectrum in clinical settings, enhancing imaging quality and patient dose management.
Methods
Data were collected from a CT scanner using a CT calibration phantom at various energy levels (80, 100, 120, and 135 kVp). The data was optimized to refine the energy spectrum model, followed by cross-validation with Monte Carlo simulations.
Results
The developed model demonstrated high precision in estimating the CT energy spectrum at all tested energy levels, with R-squared values above 0.9738 and an R-squared value of 0.9829 at 100 kVp. The model also showed low Normalized Root Mean Square Deviation (NRMSD) ranging from 0.6698 % to 1.8745 %. The Mean Energy Difference (ΔE) between the estimated and simulated spectrum consistently remained under 0.01 keV. These results were comparable to recent studies, which reported higher NRMSD and ΔE.
Conclusions
This study presents a significantly improved model for estimating the CT energy spectrum, offering greater accuracy than existing models. Its strengths include high precision and the use of standard equipment and algorithmic values. While the current use of 13 plugs is adequate, incorporating plugs with varied densities could enhance accuracy. This model has potential for improving imaging quality and optimizing patient dosing in clinical applications. Future trends may include extending energy spectrum estimation to megavoltage domains and integrating technologies like EPID and MVCT for better dose distribution prediction in high-energy photon beam therapy.
{"title":"Advanced mathematical modeling for preciseestimation of CT energy spectrum using a calibration phantom","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104819","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104819","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This research aims to develop an advanced mathematical model using a CT calibration phantom to accurately estimate the CT energy spectrum in clinical settings, enhancing imaging quality and patient dose management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were collected from a CT scanner using a CT calibration phantom at various energy levels (80, 100, 120, and 135 kVp). The data was optimized to refine the energy spectrum model, followed by cross-validation with Monte Carlo simulations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The developed model demonstrated high precision in estimating the CT energy spectrum at all tested energy levels, with R-squared values above 0.9738 and an R-squared value of 0.9829 at 100 kVp. The model also showed low Normalized Root Mean Square Deviation (NRMSD) ranging from 0.6698 % to 1.8745 %. The Mean Energy Difference (ΔE) between the estimated and simulated spectrum consistently remained under 0.01 keV. These results were comparable to recent studies, which reported higher NRMSD and ΔE.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study presents a significantly improved model for estimating the CT energy spectrum, offering greater accuracy than existing models. Its strengths include high precision and the use of standard equipment and algorithmic values. While the current use of 13 plugs is adequate, incorporating plugs with varied densities could enhance accuracy. This model has potential for improving imaging quality and optimizing patient dosing in clinical applications. Future trends may include extending energy spectrum estimation to megavoltage domains and integrating technologies like EPID and MVCT for better dose distribution prediction in high-energy photon beam therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142323357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-25DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104816
Purpose
To investigate the potential clinical benefits and dose-averaged Linear Energy Transfer (LETd) sparing, utilizing proton arc plan for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients in comparison with Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT).
Methods
Ten HCC patients have been retrospectively selected. Two planning groups were created: Proton Arc plans using Monaco ver. 6 and the clinical IMPT plan. Both planning groups used the same robustness parameters. The prescription dose is 67.5 Gy (RBE) in 15 fractions of the Clinical Target Volume (CTV). Robustness evaluations were performed to ensure dose coverage. Normal Tissue Complicated Probability (NTCP) model was utilized to predict the possibility of Radiation-Induced Liver Disease (RILD) and evaluate the potential benefit of proton arc therapy. LETd calculation and evaluation were performed as well.
Results
Proton arc plan has shown better dosimetric improvements of most Organ-At-Risks (OARs). More specifically, the liver mean dose has been significantly reduced from 14.7 GyE to 10.62 GyE compared to the IMPT plan. The predicted possibility of RILD has also been significantly reduced for cases with a large and deep liver target where healthy liver tissue sparing is a challenge. Additionally, proton arc therapy could increase the average LETd in the target and reduce LETd in adjacent OARs.
Conclusions
The potential clinical benefit of utilizing proton arc therapy HCC varies depending on the patient-specific geometry. With more freedom, proton arc therapy can offer a better dosimetric plan quality in the challenge cases, which might not be feasible using the current IMPT technique.
{"title":"Investigate potential clinical benefits and linear energy transfer sparing utilizing proton arc therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104816","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104816","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate the potential clinical benefits and dose-averaged Linear Energy Transfer (LET<sub>d</sub>) sparing, utilizing proton arc plan for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients in comparison with Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ten HCC patients have been retrospectively selected. Two planning groups were created: Proton Arc plans using Monaco ver. 6 and the clinical IMPT plan. Both planning groups used the same robustness parameters. The prescription dose is 67.5 Gy (RBE) in 15 fractions of the Clinical Target Volume (CTV). Robustness evaluations were performed to ensure dose coverage. Normal Tissue Complicated Probability (NTCP) model was utilized to predict the possibility of Radiation-Induced Liver Disease (RILD) and evaluate the potential benefit of proton arc therapy. LET<sub>d</sub> calculation and evaluation were performed as well.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Proton arc plan has shown better dosimetric improvements of most Organ-At-Risks (OARs). More specifically, the liver mean dose has been significantly reduced from 14.7 GyE to 10.62 GyE compared to the IMPT plan. The predicted possibility of RILD has also been significantly reduced for cases with a large and deep liver target where healthy liver tissue sparing is a challenge. Additionally, proton arc therapy could increase the average LET<sub>d</sub> in the target and reduce LET<sub>d</sub> in adjacent OARs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The potential clinical benefit of utilizing proton arc therapy HCC varies depending on the patient-specific geometry. With more freedom, proton arc therapy can offer a better dosimetric plan quality in the challenge cases, which might not be feasible using the current IMPT technique.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142320100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-25DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104824
Purpose
This study aimed to develop a photon-counting detector (PCD) based micro-CT simulation platform for assessing the performance of three different PCD sensor materials: cadmium telluride (CdTe), gallium arsenide (GaAs), and silicon (Si). The evaluation encompasses the components of primary and scatter signals, performance of imaging contrast agents, and detector efficiency.
Methods
Simulations were performed using the Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit, and a micro-PCD-CT system was meticulously modeled based on realistic geometric parameters. Results.
The simulation can obtain HU values consistent with measured results for iodine and calcium hydroxyapatite contrast agents. The two major components of scatter signals for CdTe and GaAs based PCD are fluorescent X-ray photons and photoelectrons, whereas for Si, the components are photoelectrons and Compton electrons. Scattering counts of CdTe and GaAs sensors can be effectively reduced by using energy thresholds, whereas those of Si sensor are insensitive to the applied threshold. The optimal threshold values for CdTe and GaAs are 30 and 15 keV, respectively. For contrast agent imaging, GaAs exhibits enhanced sensitivity to low photon energies compared to CdTe, while it’s contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values are slightly lower than those of CdTe at the same contrast agent concentration. Among the three sensor materials, Si has the lowest CNR and detector efficiency; CdTe exhibits the highest efficiency, except in low-energy ranges (< 45 keV), where GaAs has superior efficiency.
Conclusions
The proposed methods are expected to benefit PCD optimization and applications, including energy threshold selection, scattering correction, and may reduce the need for large-scale experiments.
目的 本研究旨在开发一个基于光子计数探测器(PCD)的微型计算机断层扫描模拟平台,用于评估三种不同的PCD传感器材料:碲化镉(CdTe)、砷化镓(GaAs)和硅(Si)的性能。评估内容包括主信号和散射信号的成分、成像造影剂的性能以及探测器的效率。方法:使用 Geant4 Monte Carlo 工具包进行模拟,并根据现实的几何参数对微型 PCD-CT 系统进行了细致的建模。结果:模拟可获得与碘和羟基磷灰石钙造影剂测量结果一致的 HU 值。基于碲化镉和砷化镓的 PCD 散射信号的两个主要成分是荧光 X 射线光子和光电子,而对于硅,其成分是光电子和康普顿电子。使用能量阈值可以有效减少碲化镉和砷化镓传感器的散射计数,而硅传感器的散射计数对所使用的阈值不敏感。碲化镉和砷化镓的最佳阈值分别为 30 和 15 千伏。在造影剂成像方面,与碲化镉相比,砷化镓对低光子能量的灵敏度更高,但在相同的造影剂浓度下,其对比度-噪声比(CNR)值略低于碲化镉。在三种传感器材料中,硅的 CNR 和探测器效率最低;碲化镉的效率最高,但在低能量范围(45 keV)内,砷化镓的效率更高。
{"title":"Development of a Monte Carlo simulation platform for the systematic evaluation of photon-counting detector-based micro-CT","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104824","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104824","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to develop a photon-counting detector (PCD) based micro-CT simulation platform for assessing the performance of three different PCD sensor materials: cadmium telluride (CdTe), gallium arsenide (GaAs), and silicon (Si). The evaluation encompasses the components of primary and scatter signals, performance of imaging contrast agents, and detector efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Simulations were performed using the Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit, and a micro-PCD-CT system was meticulously modeled based on realistic geometric parameters. Results.</div><div>The simulation can obtain HU values consistent with measured results for iodine and calcium hydroxyapatite contrast agents. The two major components of scatter signals for CdTe and GaAs based PCD are fluorescent X-ray photons and photoelectrons, whereas for Si, the components are photoelectrons and Compton electrons. Scattering counts of CdTe and GaAs sensors can be effectively reduced by using energy thresholds, whereas those of Si sensor are insensitive to the applied threshold. The optimal threshold values for CdTe and GaAs are 30 and 15 keV, respectively. For contrast agent imaging, GaAs exhibits enhanced sensitivity to low photon energies compared to CdTe, while it’s contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values are slightly lower than those of CdTe at the same contrast agent concentration. Among the three sensor materials, Si has the lowest CNR and detector efficiency; CdTe exhibits the highest efficiency, except in low-energy ranges (< 45 keV), where GaAs has superior efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The proposed methods are expected to benefit PCD optimization and applications, including energy threshold selection, scattering correction, and may reduce the need for large-scale experiments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142319425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-13DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104515
Purpose
To create an open-access Linear Accelerator Education and Augmented Reality Navigator (Open LEARN) via 3D printable objects and interactive augmented reality assets.
Methods
This study describes an augmented reality linear accelerator (linac) model accessible through a QR code and a smartphone to address the challenges of medical physics and radiation oncology trainees in low-to-middle-income countries.
Results
Major components of a generic linear accelerator are modeled as individual objects. These objects can be 3D printed for hands-on learning and used as interactive 3D assets within the augmented reality app. In the AR app, descriptions are displayed to navigate the components spatially and textually. Items modeled include the treatment couch, klystron, circulator, RF waveguides, electron gun, waveguide, beam steering assemblies, target, collimators, multi-leaf collimators, and imaging systems. The linear accelerator is rendered at nearly 100% of its actual size, allowing users to change magnification and view objects from different angles.
Conclusions
The augmented reality linear accelerators and 3D-printed objects make these complex machines easily accessible with smartphones and 3D-printing technologies, facilitating education and training through physical and virtual interaction.
{"title":"Open LEARN: Open access linear accelerator education and augmented reality Navigator","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104515","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104515","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To create an open-access Linear Accelerator Education and Augmented Reality Navigator (Open LEARN) via 3D printable objects and interactive augmented reality assets.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study describes an augmented reality linear accelerator (linac) model accessible through a QR code and a smartphone to address the challenges of medical physics and radiation oncology trainees in low-to-middle-income countries.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Major components of a generic linear accelerator are modeled as individual objects. These objects can be 3D printed for hands-on learning and used as interactive 3D assets within the augmented reality app. In the AR app, descriptions are displayed to navigate the components spatially and textually. Items modeled include the treatment couch, klystron, circulator, RF waveguides, electron gun, waveguide, beam steering assemblies, target, collimators, multi-leaf collimators, and imaging systems. The linear accelerator is rendered at nearly 100% of its actual size, allowing users to change magnification and view objects from different angles.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The augmented reality linear accelerators and 3D-printed objects make these complex machines easily accessible with smartphones and 3D-printing technologies, facilitating education and training through physical and virtual interaction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S112017972401072X/pdfft?md5=f497fa19cc1be003b9ea9e63e12176b0&pid=1-s2.0-S112017972401072X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142229948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103484
{"title":"SC14.04 ISODOSE-CONSTRAINED AUTOMATIC TREATMENT PLANNING WITH MULTICRITERIA RATING BASED ON PHYSICAL EVALUATION OF PREDICTED DOSE FOR NASOPHARYNGEAL CANCER","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103484","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103484","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142137024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103513
{"title":"SC22.03 COMPARISON OF BREAST POPULATION DOSE ESTIMATION BETWEEN OLD AND NEW DOSIMETRY FOR DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY (DM) AND DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS (DBT)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103513","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103513","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142136858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103504
{"title":"SC20.07 STATUS OF DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY MEDICAL PHYSICIST RECOGNITION: RESULTS OF A EUROPEAN SURVEY","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103504","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103504","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142136677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103509
{"title":"SC21.05 NOVEL SPHERICAL IN-BEAM PET SCANNER FOR ONLINE RANGE MONITORING IN SMALL ANIMAL RADIATION RESEARCH","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103509","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103509","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142136610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}