Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD-100 and GR-200) calibration for dose verification in radiotherapy: Different photon and electron energies

IF 2.8 3区 物理与天体物理 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Radiation Physics and Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112590
Bahareh Sadeghi , Reza Purimani , Mohammad Reza Bayatiani , Amir Jafari , Fatemeh Seif
{"title":"Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD-100 and GR-200) calibration for dose verification in radiotherapy: Different photon and electron energies","authors":"Bahareh Sadeghi ,&nbsp;Reza Purimani ,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Bayatiani ,&nbsp;Amir Jafari ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Seif","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Radiotherapy is a local treatment, so it is necessary to know the dose delivered and absorbed in the organs at risk and the target volumes. There are several types of radiation dosimetry measurements. Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLDs) are suitable for performing measurements on patients or phantoms due to their small size. TLD-100 and GR-200 are the most important types of TLD used in radiation dosimetry. This study aimed to determine the dependence of the TLD-100 and GR-200 doses on the energy and type of radiation. To investigate the effect of energy on the response of TLD-100 and GR-200, calibration was performed with electron beams of 6, 8, 10, and 15 MeV and photon beams of 6, 10, and 18 MV, delivering doses of 30, 50, 70, and 100 cGy. Energy-dependence curves were then plotted for different TLD doses. TLDs calibrated with electron and photon were significantly different at various doses and energies, then the regression values (R<sup>2</sup>) and the ratio of the standard deviation to the average values were calculated by drawing the calibration curve for TLD-100 and GR-200. The obtained results showed that the calibration curves in the dose range of 0–100 cGy for TLD-100 were more linear than those for GR-200, making TLD-100 better suited for dosimetry applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 112590"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X25000829","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiotherapy is a local treatment, so it is necessary to know the dose delivered and absorbed in the organs at risk and the target volumes. There are several types of radiation dosimetry measurements. Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLDs) are suitable for performing measurements on patients or phantoms due to their small size. TLD-100 and GR-200 are the most important types of TLD used in radiation dosimetry. This study aimed to determine the dependence of the TLD-100 and GR-200 doses on the energy and type of radiation. To investigate the effect of energy on the response of TLD-100 and GR-200, calibration was performed with electron beams of 6, 8, 10, and 15 MeV and photon beams of 6, 10, and 18 MV, delivering doses of 30, 50, 70, and 100 cGy. Energy-dependence curves were then plotted for different TLD doses. TLDs calibrated with electron and photon were significantly different at various doses and energies, then the regression values (R2) and the ratio of the standard deviation to the average values were calculated by drawing the calibration curve for TLD-100 and GR-200. The obtained results showed that the calibration curves in the dose range of 0–100 cGy for TLD-100 were more linear than those for GR-200, making TLD-100 better suited for dosimetry applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于放射治疗剂量验证的热释光剂量计(TLD-100和GR-200)校准:不同光子和电子能量
放射治疗是一种局部治疗,因此有必要了解在危险器官中释放和吸收的剂量以及靶体积。有几种类型的辐射剂量测量。热释光剂量计(tld)由于体积小,适合对病人或幽灵进行测量。TLD-100和GR-200是辐射剂量学中最重要的TLD类型。本研究旨在确定TLD-100和GR-200剂量与辐射能量和类型的依赖关系。为了研究能量对TLD-100和GR-200响应的影响,采用6、8、10和15 MeV的电子束和6、10和18 MV的光子束进行校准,剂量分别为30、50、70和100 cGy。然后绘制不同TLD剂量的能量依赖曲线。在不同剂量和能量下,电子和光子标定的tld存在显著差异,通过绘制TLD-100和GR-200的标定曲线,计算其回归值(R2)和标准差与平均值的比值。结果表明,与GR-200相比,TLD-100在0 ~ 100 cGy剂量范围内的校准曲线更加线性,更适合于剂量学应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Physics and Chemistry
Radiation Physics and Chemistry 化学-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
17.20%
发文量
574
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing. The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.
期刊最新文献
Test of sapphire crystals as a fast neutron filter using a liquid scintillator detector SAF calculations in ICRP145 adult male mesh phantom: Electrons and photons (10 keV–2 MeV) Evaluation of the optical response of the ophthalmic transitions Signature® GEN 8™ photochromic grey lens to (UV-A) ultraviolet radiation Effects of low intensity He–Ne and CO2 laser light irradiation on normal-blood human platelets Modulation of EAG1 potassium channel activity by SiO2 nanoparticles in irradiated DU145 prostate cancer cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1