Comparative study of operating modes on a gaseous two-stage compressed carbon dioxide energy storage system through energy and exergy analysis based on dynamic simulation

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2025.134521
Yuan Zhang , Xiajie Shen , Zhen Tian , Ankang Kan , Chao Yang , Wenzhong Gao , Ke Yang
{"title":"Comparative study of operating modes on a gaseous two-stage compressed carbon dioxide energy storage system through energy and exergy analysis based on dynamic simulation","authors":"Yuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiajie Shen ,&nbsp;Zhen Tian ,&nbsp;Ankang Kan ,&nbsp;Chao Yang ,&nbsp;Wenzhong Gao ,&nbsp;Ke Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.134521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper conducts a thermodynamic analysis on up to 8 operating modes, including various pressure and water storage settings, of a gaseous two-stage compressed carbon dioxide energy storage system. Additionally, the potential of CO<sub>2</sub> binary working fluids in stabilizing the system condition is also discussed through the comparison with pure CO<sub>2</sub> cases. According to the results, the system efficiency ranges from 48.48 % to 56.70 %, depending on the operating mode. The constant pressure mode exhibits an 89.1 % variation in pressure ratio on compression than the sliding pressure mode at the cost of reduced system efficiency. Similarly, a reduction of up to 17.3 % in the pressure ratio on expansion is found in constant pressure discharge process despite the expense of a nearly 1 % decrease in system efficiency. A lower HX1 outlet temperature leads to more balanced water consumption and thus improved system efficiency. Almost doubled energy density is observed when high-pressure tank (HPT) volume decreases to 1000 m<sup>3</sup>. The application of binary working fluids results in a more stable system performance compared to the sliding pressure mode, and higher system efficiency than the constant pressure mode. The work in this paper offers insights and guidance for future practical system designs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"316 ","pages":"Article 134521"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422500163X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper conducts a thermodynamic analysis on up to 8 operating modes, including various pressure and water storage settings, of a gaseous two-stage compressed carbon dioxide energy storage system. Additionally, the potential of CO2 binary working fluids in stabilizing the system condition is also discussed through the comparison with pure CO2 cases. According to the results, the system efficiency ranges from 48.48 % to 56.70 %, depending on the operating mode. The constant pressure mode exhibits an 89.1 % variation in pressure ratio on compression than the sliding pressure mode at the cost of reduced system efficiency. Similarly, a reduction of up to 17.3 % in the pressure ratio on expansion is found in constant pressure discharge process despite the expense of a nearly 1 % decrease in system efficiency. A lower HX1 outlet temperature leads to more balanced water consumption and thus improved system efficiency. Almost doubled energy density is observed when high-pressure tank (HPT) volume decreases to 1000 m3. The application of binary working fluids results in a more stable system performance compared to the sliding pressure mode, and higher system efficiency than the constant pressure mode. The work in this paper offers insights and guidance for future practical system designs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于动态仿真的能量与火用分析,对气体两级压缩二氧化碳储能系统运行模式进行对比研究
本文对气态两级压缩二氧化碳储能系统的多达8种工作模式进行了热力学分析,包括各种压力和储水设置。此外,通过与纯CO2工况的比较,讨论了CO2二元工质在稳定系统状态方面的潜力。结果表明,根据不同的运行方式,系统效率在48.48% ~ 56.70%之间。恒压模式在压缩时的压力比变化比滑动压力模式大89.1%,但代价是系统效率降低。同样,在恒压排放过程中,尽管系统效率降低了近1%,但膨胀时的压力比降低了17.3%。HX1出口温度越低,耗水量越平衡,系统效率越高。当高压罐(HPT)体积减小到1000 m3时,观察到能量密度几乎翻了一番。与滑动压力模式相比,二元工质的应用使系统性能更加稳定,并且比恒压模式具有更高的系统效率。本文的工作为今后的实际系统设计提供了参考和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
期刊最新文献
Research on hierarchical eco-driving strategy for fuel cell hybrid electric vehicles based on traffic flow Oxy-blown bubbling fluidized bed gasification of high-ash Indian coal: A pilot – Scale demonstration An electromagnetic-piezoelectric high-efficiency hybrid wave energy harvester with direction self-adaptive characteristics based on an asymmetric rotating pendulum Improving the long-term sustainability of photovoltaic thermal - ground source heat pump system by soil thermal balance regulation Hierarchical model predictive control of greenhouse energy systems considering energy-water-carbon-food nexus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1