Towards radical circular economy futures: Addressing social relations of production

IF 13.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Technological Forecasting and Social Change Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2025.123972
Leandro J. Llorente-González , Josep Pinyol Alberich , Andrea Genovese , Benjamin H. Lowe
{"title":"Towards radical circular economy futures: Addressing social relations of production","authors":"Leandro J. Llorente-González ,&nbsp;Josep Pinyol Alberich ,&nbsp;Andrea Genovese ,&nbsp;Benjamin H. Lowe","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2025.123972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The mainstream narrative associated with the transition to a circular economy is one linked to eco-modernism: paradigmatic change is depicted as an apolitical and technical matter that is fully compatible with growth-led and market-based capitalist logic. As a result of the dominance of this viewpoint, the socio-political foundations of the transition to the circular economy have largely gone unquestioned. This is particularly pronounced regarding how variations in the social relations of production could shape the transition to alternative and more radical futures. This paper aims to address this knowledge gap by incorporating social relations of production into the analysis of circular economy futures. In doing so, a set of nine future circular scenarios is developed by drawing on a typology of five conceptual dimensions that include ownership of the means of production and access to the resulting goods. The typology and the circular scenarios are then validated by a three-part Delphi-like approach. It is argued that the proposed set of scenarios allows a more nuanced understanding of circular economy futures than previous contributions as they provide further insights about key actors and forces of change that could drive the transition to a sustainable society beyond neoliberal capitalism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 123972"},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525000034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mainstream narrative associated with the transition to a circular economy is one linked to eco-modernism: paradigmatic change is depicted as an apolitical and technical matter that is fully compatible with growth-led and market-based capitalist logic. As a result of the dominance of this viewpoint, the socio-political foundations of the transition to the circular economy have largely gone unquestioned. This is particularly pronounced regarding how variations in the social relations of production could shape the transition to alternative and more radical futures. This paper aims to address this knowledge gap by incorporating social relations of production into the analysis of circular economy futures. In doing so, a set of nine future circular scenarios is developed by drawing on a typology of five conceptual dimensions that include ownership of the means of production and access to the resulting goods. The typology and the circular scenarios are then validated by a three-part Delphi-like approach. It is argued that the proposed set of scenarios allows a more nuanced understanding of circular economy futures than previous contributions as they provide further insights about key actors and forces of change that could drive the transition to a sustainable society beyond neoliberal capitalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向激进的循环经济未来:解决社会生产关系
与向循环经济过渡相关的主流叙事与生态现代主义有关:范式变化被描述为与增长主导和市场为基础的资本主义逻辑完全兼容的非政治和技术问题。由于这种观点的主导地位,向循环经济过渡的社会政治基础在很大程度上没有受到质疑。这一点在社会生产关系的变化如何塑造向可选择的、更激进的未来的过渡方面尤为明显。本文旨在通过将社会生产关系纳入循环经济未来的分析来解决这一知识差距。在此过程中,通过借鉴五个概念维度的类型学,包括生产资料的所有权和对所得商品的获取,开发了一套九个未来循环方案。然后通过类似delphi的三部分方法验证类型和循环场景。有人认为,与之前的贡献相比,所提出的一组情景可以更细致入微地理解循环经济的未来,因为它们提供了关于可能推动向超越新自由主义资本主义的可持续社会过渡的关键行动者和变革力量的进一步见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
期刊最新文献
Fostering well-being in Industry 5.0 through managerial behaviours and enabling technologies Sustainable technology evolution in innovation ecosystems: A regulatory framework for (non)-convergent technologies Diagnosing pharmaceutical regulatory agencies: A metacybernetic framework for innovation and governance Patent strategies in the age of FinTech: Understanding IP management practices and open innovation across financial institutions Forecasting emerging job opportunities using the subject-action-object approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1