Temporal trends of characteristics and management of patients with suspected MINOCA

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS International journal of cardiology Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133039
Giuseppe Ciliberti , Federico Fortuni , Andrea Santucci , Alessandro Timi , Emanuel Barnoffi , Stefano Coiro , Federico Guerra , Maurizio Del Pinto , Paolo Compagnucci , Rocco Sclafani , Michela Casella , Ketty Savino , Antonio Dello Russo , Giuseppe Ambrosio , Erberto Carluccio
{"title":"Temporal trends of characteristics and management of patients with suspected MINOCA","authors":"Giuseppe Ciliberti ,&nbsp;Federico Fortuni ,&nbsp;Andrea Santucci ,&nbsp;Alessandro Timi ,&nbsp;Emanuel Barnoffi ,&nbsp;Stefano Coiro ,&nbsp;Federico Guerra ,&nbsp;Maurizio Del Pinto ,&nbsp;Paolo Compagnucci ,&nbsp;Rocco Sclafani ,&nbsp;Michela Casella ,&nbsp;Ketty Savino ,&nbsp;Antonio Dello Russo ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Ambrosio ,&nbsp;Erberto Carluccio","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) is a challenging condition which requires appropriate management and therapy. Although specific guidelines and recommendations for this condition have been introduced, there are few data about management implementation over time. The aim of this study is to compare two cohorts of patients affected by suspected MINOCA to assess the temporal trends change in the clinical characteristics and management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two patient cohorts were retrospectively selected from a single centre (Cardiology Department of Perugia University Hospital) and compared to investigate the differences in characteristics and management before and after the release of 2018 MINOCA guidelines. The Group included patients enrolled from January 2006 to December 2014, and the Group 2 from July 1st, 2020, to July 31st, 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Group 1 included 150 patients and Group 2 83 patients. Compared to group 1, group 2 showed higher prevalence of hypercholesterolemia (57 % vs 27 % p &lt; 0,001), prior acute myocardial infarction (23 % vs 5 %, <em>p</em> &lt;0,001), preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (90 % vs 67 %, <em>p</em> = 0,03), use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (27 % vs 0 %,<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), prescription of beta-blockers (69 % vs 31 %,p &lt; 0.001), calcium channel blockers (46 % vs 16 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), statins (81 % vs 59 %, <em>p</em> = 0.03) and a less frequent occurrence of ST-elevation on admission ECG (9 % vs 24 %, <em>p</em> = 0.005), prescription of dual antiplatelet therapy (20 % vs 58 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and nitrates (12 % vs 54 %, p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In the present study, characteristics and management of patients with suspected MINOCA has significantly changed over time. However, discrepancies with guidelines recommendation still exist and implementation strategies are needed to fill this gap and improve clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"424 ","pages":"Article 133039"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527325000828","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) is a challenging condition which requires appropriate management and therapy. Although specific guidelines and recommendations for this condition have been introduced, there are few data about management implementation over time. The aim of this study is to compare two cohorts of patients affected by suspected MINOCA to assess the temporal trends change in the clinical characteristics and management.

Methods

Two patient cohorts were retrospectively selected from a single centre (Cardiology Department of Perugia University Hospital) and compared to investigate the differences in characteristics and management before and after the release of 2018 MINOCA guidelines. The Group included patients enrolled from January 2006 to December 2014, and the Group 2 from July 1st, 2020, to July 31st, 2023.

Results

Group 1 included 150 patients and Group 2 83 patients. Compared to group 1, group 2 showed higher prevalence of hypercholesterolemia (57 % vs 27 % p < 0,001), prior acute myocardial infarction (23 % vs 5 %, p <0,001), preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (90 % vs 67 %, p = 0,03), use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (27 % vs 0 %,p < 0.001), prescription of beta-blockers (69 % vs 31 %,p < 0.001), calcium channel blockers (46 % vs 16 %, p < 0.001), statins (81 % vs 59 %, p = 0.03) and a less frequent occurrence of ST-elevation on admission ECG (9 % vs 24 %, p = 0.005), prescription of dual antiplatelet therapy (20 % vs 58 %, p < 0.001) and nitrates (12 % vs 54 %, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In the present study, characteristics and management of patients with suspected MINOCA has significantly changed over time. However, discrepancies with guidelines recommendation still exist and implementation strategies are needed to fill this gap and improve clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology
International journal of cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers. In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognosis across cardiomyopathies” [International journal of cardiology (2025)] Is estimating hyperemic microvascular resistance the best available option? Balancing ischemia and bleeding in high-bleeding risk PCI: A tightrope walk Temporal trends of characteristics and management of patients with suspected MINOCA Reply to Letter to the Editor for the “NSUN2/PARP1 signaling axis: A potential mechanism for treating aging associated atrial fibrillation”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1