Does multiplication always make bigger? Exploring individual differences in NanoRoboMath game play

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Learning and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102643
Tomi Kärki , Hilma Halme , Minna Hannula-Sormunen , Erno Lehtinen , Jake McMullen
{"title":"Does multiplication always make bigger? Exploring individual differences in NanoRoboMath game play","authors":"Tomi Kärki ,&nbsp;Hilma Halme ,&nbsp;Minna Hannula-Sormunen ,&nbsp;Erno Lehtinen ,&nbsp;Jake McMullen","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many students tend to inappropriately apply natural-number-biased reasoning in fraction and decimal tasks, including believing multiplication always makes bigger and division makes smaller. In this study, we examined individual differences in the game play of NanoRoboMath, a digital game designed to improve students' rational number knowledge. Examining the game performance of 90 seventh grade students allowed us to find four player profiles that were connected to learning the effects of multiplicative operations. Students in the High profile used multiplication and division by numbers less than one more frequently and had stronger learning gains with operation knowledge results compared to Long play low gain profile. This suggests that the player profiles reflect some features of students' game play and performance that may be relevant for conceptual change processes of understanding the effects of multiplicative operations.</div></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications statement</h3><div>The present study provides novel insights into individual differences in students' performance while playing a game aimed at promoting conceptual knowledge of rational numbers. It manifests a relation between player profiles and learning gains. The study contributes to the design of game-based learning environments by suggesting that providing students with repeated opportunities to confront their prior misconceptions in game-based learning environments may be beneficial for supporting conceptual development. The study also indicates that there may be multiple ways to productively engage with educational games. This is valuable for educators in understanding how to employ game-based learning environments in their classrooms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102643"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025000196","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many students tend to inappropriately apply natural-number-biased reasoning in fraction and decimal tasks, including believing multiplication always makes bigger and division makes smaller. In this study, we examined individual differences in the game play of NanoRoboMath, a digital game designed to improve students' rational number knowledge. Examining the game performance of 90 seventh grade students allowed us to find four player profiles that were connected to learning the effects of multiplicative operations. Students in the High profile used multiplication and division by numbers less than one more frequently and had stronger learning gains with operation knowledge results compared to Long play low gain profile. This suggests that the player profiles reflect some features of students' game play and performance that may be relevant for conceptual change processes of understanding the effects of multiplicative operations.

Educational relevance and implications statement

The present study provides novel insights into individual differences in students' performance while playing a game aimed at promoting conceptual knowledge of rational numbers. It manifests a relation between player profiles and learning gains. The study contributes to the design of game-based learning environments by suggesting that providing students with repeated opportunities to confront their prior misconceptions in game-based learning environments may be beneficial for supporting conceptual development. The study also indicates that there may be multiple ways to productively engage with educational games. This is valuable for educators in understanding how to employ game-based learning environments in their classrooms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
期刊最新文献
The trajectories of creativity development in childhood High-achieving students in mathematics: A heterogeneous group Does multiplication always make bigger? Exploring individual differences in NanoRoboMath game play Directional or reciprocal? A random intercept cross-lagged panel analysis of the relationships between emotions, motivation, willingness to communicate, and L2 achievement Memorizing plans with an app: Large individual differences in the effectiveness of retrieval-based and generative learning activities in a naturalistic context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1