Hybrid LCA for sustainable transitions: principles, applications, and prospects

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2025.115443
R.H. Hagenaars , R. Heijungs , A. Tukker , R. Wang
{"title":"Hybrid LCA for sustainable transitions: principles, applications, and prospects","authors":"R.H. Hagenaars ,&nbsp;R. Heijungs ,&nbsp;A. Tukker ,&nbsp;R. Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hybrid life cycle assessment (LCA) offers an integrated approach, combining process-based and input-output data. As such, it strives for a more comprehensive and precise evaluation of alternative technologies and products, supporting sustainability transitions. A review of 114 studies from 2016 to 2022 reveals that hybrid LCA applications are most commonly focused on energy systems (24 %), with a strong emphasis on assessing climate change impacts. Hybrid LCA is crucial for addressing the data gaps prevalent in environmental evaluations of renewable energy technologies. Methodological innovations, such as combining hybrid LCA with multi-objective optimization, show promise in pinpointing ideal locations and designs for energy plants, such as biorefineries. However, a concerning observation is that many studies employed oversimplified or inadequately documented hybridization procedures, raising questions about their robustness. The review also identifies several remaining challenges in hybrid LCA, including the linearity assumptions, omission of capital goods, price data uncertainties, and inconsistencies in environmental flow data. A significant advancement lies in creating standardized datasets, especially for construction materials. Such datasets could enable large-scale evaluations of embodied impacts across projects, facilitating the selection of construction materials based on comprehensive material trade-offs and supporting net-zero carbon construction. Furthermore, to enhance hybrid LCA in future research, this study presents a streamlined classification of the various methods, clarifying their intended purpose and computational structure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 115443"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125001169","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hybrid life cycle assessment (LCA) offers an integrated approach, combining process-based and input-output data. As such, it strives for a more comprehensive and precise evaluation of alternative technologies and products, supporting sustainability transitions. A review of 114 studies from 2016 to 2022 reveals that hybrid LCA applications are most commonly focused on energy systems (24 %), with a strong emphasis on assessing climate change impacts. Hybrid LCA is crucial for addressing the data gaps prevalent in environmental evaluations of renewable energy technologies. Methodological innovations, such as combining hybrid LCA with multi-objective optimization, show promise in pinpointing ideal locations and designs for energy plants, such as biorefineries. However, a concerning observation is that many studies employed oversimplified or inadequately documented hybridization procedures, raising questions about their robustness. The review also identifies several remaining challenges in hybrid LCA, including the linearity assumptions, omission of capital goods, price data uncertainties, and inconsistencies in environmental flow data. A significant advancement lies in creating standardized datasets, especially for construction materials. Such datasets could enable large-scale evaluations of embodied impacts across projects, facilitating the selection of construction materials based on comprehensive material trade-offs and supporting net-zero carbon construction. Furthermore, to enhance hybrid LCA in future research, this study presents a streamlined classification of the various methods, clarifying their intended purpose and computational structure.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Informal economies and energy efficiency: Empirical evidence from African countries Impact of hydrogen on cement slurry: A review Product quality research in the industrialized preparation of electronic grade polysilicon: A review of impurity sources and control strategies An experimental study for improving performance of a cylindrical OWC WEC with a heave plate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1