Hybrid LCA for sustainable transitions: principles, applications, and prospects

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2025.115443
R.H. Hagenaars , R. Heijungs , A. Tukker , R. Wang
{"title":"Hybrid LCA for sustainable transitions: principles, applications, and prospects","authors":"R.H. Hagenaars ,&nbsp;R. Heijungs ,&nbsp;A. Tukker ,&nbsp;R. Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hybrid life cycle assessment (LCA) offers an integrated approach, combining process-based and input-output data. As such, it strives for a more comprehensive and precise evaluation of alternative technologies and products, supporting sustainability transitions. A review of 114 studies from 2016 to 2022 reveals that hybrid LCA applications are most commonly focused on energy systems (24 %), with a strong emphasis on assessing climate change impacts. Hybrid LCA is crucial for addressing the data gaps prevalent in environmental evaluations of renewable energy technologies. Methodological innovations, such as combining hybrid LCA with multi-objective optimization, show promise in pinpointing ideal locations and designs for energy plants, such as biorefineries. However, a concerning observation is that many studies employed oversimplified or inadequately documented hybridization procedures, raising questions about their robustness. The review also identifies several remaining challenges in hybrid LCA, including the linearity assumptions, omission of capital goods, price data uncertainties, and inconsistencies in environmental flow data. A significant advancement lies in creating standardized datasets, especially for construction materials. Such datasets could enable large-scale evaluations of embodied impacts across projects, facilitating the selection of construction materials based on comprehensive material trade-offs and supporting net-zero carbon construction. Furthermore, to enhance hybrid LCA in future research, this study presents a streamlined classification of the various methods, clarifying their intended purpose and computational structure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 115443"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125001169","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hybrid life cycle assessment (LCA) offers an integrated approach, combining process-based and input-output data. As such, it strives for a more comprehensive and precise evaluation of alternative technologies and products, supporting sustainability transitions. A review of 114 studies from 2016 to 2022 reveals that hybrid LCA applications are most commonly focused on energy systems (24 %), with a strong emphasis on assessing climate change impacts. Hybrid LCA is crucial for addressing the data gaps prevalent in environmental evaluations of renewable energy technologies. Methodological innovations, such as combining hybrid LCA with multi-objective optimization, show promise in pinpointing ideal locations and designs for energy plants, such as biorefineries. However, a concerning observation is that many studies employed oversimplified or inadequately documented hybridization procedures, raising questions about their robustness. The review also identifies several remaining challenges in hybrid LCA, including the linearity assumptions, omission of capital goods, price data uncertainties, and inconsistencies in environmental flow data. A significant advancement lies in creating standardized datasets, especially for construction materials. Such datasets could enable large-scale evaluations of embodied impacts across projects, facilitating the selection of construction materials based on comprehensive material trade-offs and supporting net-zero carbon construction. Furthermore, to enhance hybrid LCA in future research, this study presents a streamlined classification of the various methods, clarifying their intended purpose and computational structure.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续转型的混合LCA:原则、应用和前景
混合生命周期评估(LCA)提供了一种综合方法,结合了基于过程的数据和投入产出数据。因此,它力求对替代技术和产品进行更全面和准确的评估,以支持可持续性转型。对2016年至2022年114项研究的回顾显示,混合LCA应用最常集中在能源系统(24%),重点是评估气候变化的影响。混合LCA对于解决可再生能源技术环境评价中普遍存在的数据差距至关重要。方法上的创新,例如将混合LCA与多目标优化相结合,在确定能源工厂(如生物精炼厂)的理想位置和设计方面显示出了希望。然而,一个令人担忧的观察是,许多研究采用了过于简化或记录不充分的杂交程序,这引起了对其稳健性的质疑。该综述还指出了混合LCA仍存在的几个挑战,包括线性假设、遗漏资本货物、价格数据的不确定性以及环境流量数据的不一致性。一个重要的进步在于创建标准化的数据集,特别是建筑材料。这样的数据集可以对各个项目的具体影响进行大规模评估,促进基于综合材料权衡的建筑材料选择,并支持净零碳建筑。此外,为了在未来的研究中加强混合LCA,本研究对各种方法进行了简化分类,明确了它们的预期目的和计算结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Fracture flow channeling in enhanced geothermal systems: THMC feedback mechanisms and mitigation strategies Integrated dark fermentation and bioelectrochemical systems for waste valorization: A review of microbial fuel cell and microbial electrolysis cell coupling approaches Flash Joule heating: An ultrafast electrothermal strategy for solid waste valorization and resource recovery The Renewable energy-Food processing-Sustainability Nexus: A PRISMA review of innovations, sustainability metrics and indicators Thermal interface materials for thermal management of Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1