{"title":"Artificial solid electrolyte interphase: The Holy Grail for Li-S batteries","authors":"Mohsen Hajian Foroushani, Samane Maroufi, Rasoul Khayyam Nekouei, Veena Sahajwalla","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lithium metal exhibits exceptional characteristics, owing to its highest specific capacity (3860 mAh g<sup>−1</sup>) and the lowest electrochemical potential (−3.04 V vs. SHE) among all available metal anodes. The synergy effect of Li and sulfur, with specific capacity of 1670 mAh g<sup>−1</sup>, positions Li–S batteries (LSBs) as a highly promising candidate for the next generation of high-energy density batteries. Nonetheless, the full commercialization of LSBs is dependent upon overcoming a range of shortcomings that such batteries possess. One of the most formidable challenges is the pervasive issue of Li dendrite nucleation and growth on the anode surface, caused by the instability of the solid electrolyte interphase layer. Numerous efforts have been made so far to control the nucleation and growth of Li dendrites, with the establishment of a stable artificial solid electrolyte interphase (ASEI) layer proving to be one of the most effective approaches. This review provides a focused, comprehensive analysis of ASEI layers, addressing a critical gap in existing literature, which often broadly covers Li anode challenges without specifically targeting ASEI-related strategies. It explores recent advancements in ASEI fabrication methods, including dip coating, drop casting, roll pressing, magnetron sputtering, and other innovative techniques, with a thorough discussion of each method's strengths, limitations, and key influencing factors. Furthermore, the review examines the scalability, performance, and effectiveness of ASEI layers under real-world conditions, such as high sulfur loading, limited electrolyte volumes, and carbonate-based electrolytes, while assessing their impact on electrochemical performance across varied battery configurations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 115453"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125001261","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lithium metal exhibits exceptional characteristics, owing to its highest specific capacity (3860 mAh g−1) and the lowest electrochemical potential (−3.04 V vs. SHE) among all available metal anodes. The synergy effect of Li and sulfur, with specific capacity of 1670 mAh g−1, positions Li–S batteries (LSBs) as a highly promising candidate for the next generation of high-energy density batteries. Nonetheless, the full commercialization of LSBs is dependent upon overcoming a range of shortcomings that such batteries possess. One of the most formidable challenges is the pervasive issue of Li dendrite nucleation and growth on the anode surface, caused by the instability of the solid electrolyte interphase layer. Numerous efforts have been made so far to control the nucleation and growth of Li dendrites, with the establishment of a stable artificial solid electrolyte interphase (ASEI) layer proving to be one of the most effective approaches. This review provides a focused, comprehensive analysis of ASEI layers, addressing a critical gap in existing literature, which often broadly covers Li anode challenges without specifically targeting ASEI-related strategies. It explores recent advancements in ASEI fabrication methods, including dip coating, drop casting, roll pressing, magnetron sputtering, and other innovative techniques, with a thorough discussion of each method's strengths, limitations, and key influencing factors. Furthermore, the review examines the scalability, performance, and effectiveness of ASEI layers under real-world conditions, such as high sulfur loading, limited electrolyte volumes, and carbonate-based electrolytes, while assessing their impact on electrochemical performance across varied battery configurations.
在所有可用的金属阳极中,金属锂具有最高的比容量(3860 mAh g−1)和最低的电化学电位(- 3.04 V vs. SHE)。锂和硫的协同效应,具有1670 mAh g−1的比容量,使锂硫电池(LSBs)成为下一代高能量密度电池的一个非常有前途的候选电池。尽管如此,lsb的全面商业化取决于克服这种电池所具有的一系列缺点。最严峻的挑战之一是阳极表面普遍存在的锂枝晶成核和生长问题,这是由固体电解质间相层的不稳定性引起的。迄今为止,为了控制锂枝晶的成核和生长已经做了许多努力,其中建立稳定的人工固体电解质界面层(ASEI)被证明是最有效的方法之一。这篇综述提供了对ASEI层的集中、全面的分析,解决了现有文献中的一个关键空白,这些文献通常广泛地涵盖了锂阳极的挑战,而没有专门针对ASEI相关的策略。它探讨了ASEI制造方法的最新进展,包括浸涂,滴铸,辊压,磁控溅射和其他创新技术,并深入讨论了每种方法的优势,局限性和关键影响因素。此外,本文还考察了ASEI层在实际条件下的可扩展性、性能和有效性,例如高硫负载、有限电解质体积和碳酸基电解质,同时评估了它们对不同电池配置下电化学性能的影响。
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.