{"title":"Linking the life stages of fish into a habitat-ecological flow assessment scheme under climate change and human activities","authors":"Yiming Zhang , Wensheng Wang , Siyi Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is widely recognized that climate change and human activities can alter the flow regimes and thus the fish habitats. Limited research has integrated fish habitats with swimming ability and ecological preferences of fish at various life stages to assess the impacts of climate change and human activities. Meanwhile, a comprehensive study of ecological flow combining fish habitats with swimming ability and ecological preferences of fish is currently lacking. Here the runoff under different scenarios was firstly acquired, including baseline scenario (BS, with no impact), climate change scenario (CS, impacted by climate change), and variation scenario (VS, impacted by climate change and human activities). Then, a habitat assessment framework encompassing the swimming ability of fish during migration stage and their ecological preferences during spawning and feeding stages was developed to assess fish habitats under different scenarios. In this framework, blocked index (BI) and percentages of the longest continuous river reach (PLR) were proposed to quantify the habitat connectivity conditions during migration stage. Habitat patch area (HPA), weighted usable area (WUA), and habitat connectivity index (HCI) were employed to assess fish habitats during spawning and feeding stages. Finally, a hydrology-hydrodynamic-habitat framework was established to quantify optimal ecological flow (OEF) and threshold ecological flow (TEF). The Jinsha River Basin (JRB) and the downstream reach of Xiangjiaba (XJB) hydropower station in the Jinsha River was selected as the study area and study reach, respectively. The results demonstrated that the habitat connectivity was slightly decrease due to climate change and greatly reduced under climate change and human activities during migration stage. During spawning and feeding stages, a reduction was observed in HPA, WUA, and HCI under climate change, and an accentuated reduction under climate change and human activities. The OEFs are in the ranges of 1500–2000 m<sup>3</sup>/s, 4800–6500 m<sup>3</sup>/s, and 3700–5800 m<sup>3</sup>/s for migration, spawning, and feeding stages, and the TEFs are 1300–2600 m<sup>3</sup>/s, 3500–8400 m<sup>3</sup>/s, and 2700–8100 m<sup>3</sup>/s, respectively. The current study provides an innovative and feasible habitat-ecological flow assessment scheme for managers to address the aquatic ecological degradation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 113178"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25001074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
It is widely recognized that climate change and human activities can alter the flow regimes and thus the fish habitats. Limited research has integrated fish habitats with swimming ability and ecological preferences of fish at various life stages to assess the impacts of climate change and human activities. Meanwhile, a comprehensive study of ecological flow combining fish habitats with swimming ability and ecological preferences of fish is currently lacking. Here the runoff under different scenarios was firstly acquired, including baseline scenario (BS, with no impact), climate change scenario (CS, impacted by climate change), and variation scenario (VS, impacted by climate change and human activities). Then, a habitat assessment framework encompassing the swimming ability of fish during migration stage and their ecological preferences during spawning and feeding stages was developed to assess fish habitats under different scenarios. In this framework, blocked index (BI) and percentages of the longest continuous river reach (PLR) were proposed to quantify the habitat connectivity conditions during migration stage. Habitat patch area (HPA), weighted usable area (WUA), and habitat connectivity index (HCI) were employed to assess fish habitats during spawning and feeding stages. Finally, a hydrology-hydrodynamic-habitat framework was established to quantify optimal ecological flow (OEF) and threshold ecological flow (TEF). The Jinsha River Basin (JRB) and the downstream reach of Xiangjiaba (XJB) hydropower station in the Jinsha River was selected as the study area and study reach, respectively. The results demonstrated that the habitat connectivity was slightly decrease due to climate change and greatly reduced under climate change and human activities during migration stage. During spawning and feeding stages, a reduction was observed in HPA, WUA, and HCI under climate change, and an accentuated reduction under climate change and human activities. The OEFs are in the ranges of 1500–2000 m3/s, 4800–6500 m3/s, and 3700–5800 m3/s for migration, spawning, and feeding stages, and the TEFs are 1300–2600 m3/s, 3500–8400 m3/s, and 2700–8100 m3/s, respectively. The current study provides an innovative and feasible habitat-ecological flow assessment scheme for managers to address the aquatic ecological degradation.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.