Evaluation of China’s rural resource and environmental carrying capacity based on the ZI–CI–GI framework

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113174
Zhiyuan Ma , Xuejun Duan , Lei Wang , Yazhu Wang , Wei Yan , Haiyue Wang , Xiayi Ju
{"title":"Evaluation of China’s rural resource and environmental carrying capacity based on the ZI–CI–GI framework","authors":"Zhiyuan Ma ,&nbsp;Xuejun Duan ,&nbsp;Lei Wang ,&nbsp;Yazhu Wang ,&nbsp;Wei Yan ,&nbsp;Haiyue Wang ,&nbsp;Xiayi Ju","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effectively evaluating the carrying capacity of rural resources and the environment, and identifying key factors for its enhancement, are critical for rural sustainability. To meet this objective, a coupling model for rural resource and environmental carrying capacity (RRECC) was constructed using multi-source spatiotemporal data. The model incorporates the zonal division index of resources and environment (ZI), the categorization index of socioeconomic development (CI), and the grading index of population concentration (GI). Spatial autocorrelation and factor contribution analysis were employed to simulate the RRECC of China and identify key factors for enhancing this capacity. The results show that the overall carrying capacity status of China’s rural resources and environment is favorable. Out of 30,055 rural study units, 91.076% are in balance and surplus states, encompassing 90.044% of the population and 66.451% of the land. The carrying capacity exhibits a spatial pattern of higher capacity in the east and south, with significant spatial clustering. The contributions of socioeconomic development and ecological environment protection to carrying capacity are 28.018% and 27.625%, respectively. Therefore, enhancing carrying capacity requires synergistic advancement in both areas. This study advances the evaluation methods for resource and environmental carrying capacity (RECC) in rural areas, providing scientific guidance and support for the realization of the great goal of the Rural Revitalization Strategy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 113174"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25001037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effectively evaluating the carrying capacity of rural resources and the environment, and identifying key factors for its enhancement, are critical for rural sustainability. To meet this objective, a coupling model for rural resource and environmental carrying capacity (RRECC) was constructed using multi-source spatiotemporal data. The model incorporates the zonal division index of resources and environment (ZI), the categorization index of socioeconomic development (CI), and the grading index of population concentration (GI). Spatial autocorrelation and factor contribution analysis were employed to simulate the RRECC of China and identify key factors for enhancing this capacity. The results show that the overall carrying capacity status of China’s rural resources and environment is favorable. Out of 30,055 rural study units, 91.076% are in balance and surplus states, encompassing 90.044% of the population and 66.451% of the land. The carrying capacity exhibits a spatial pattern of higher capacity in the east and south, with significant spatial clustering. The contributions of socioeconomic development and ecological environment protection to carrying capacity are 28.018% and 27.625%, respectively. Therefore, enhancing carrying capacity requires synergistic advancement in both areas. This study advances the evaluation methods for resource and environmental carrying capacity (RECC) in rural areas, providing scientific guidance and support for the realization of the great goal of the Rural Revitalization Strategy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于ZI-CI-GI框架的中国农村资源环境承载力评价
有效评价农村资源环境承载力,确定提高农村资源环境承载力的关键因素,对农村可持续发展具有重要意义。为实现这一目标,利用多源时空数据构建了农村资源环境承载力耦合模型。该模型结合了资源环境分区指数(ZI)、社会经济发展分类指数(CI)和人口集聚分级指数(GI)。采用空间自相关分析和因子贡献分析方法对中国区域区域经济合作能力进行了模拟,找出了提高区域经济合作能力的关键因素。结果表明,中国农村资源环境总体承载力状况良好。在30,055个农村研究单位中,91.076%处于平衡和盈余状态,人口占90.044%,土地占66.451%。承载力呈现东部和南部承载力较高的空间格局,空间集聚性显著。社会经济发展和生态环境保护对承载力的贡献分别为28.018%和27.625%。因此,提高承载能力需要两方面协同推进。本研究提出了乡村资源环境承载力评价方法,为乡村振兴战略宏伟目标的实现提供科学指导和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
期刊最新文献
Vulnerability of different Colorado plateau land types to drivers of change Nature-based adaptation in human dominated coastal ecosystems Research on Water Resources Carrying Capacity in the Hexi Inland River Basin of China Based on "Four Waters and Four Determinations"-System Dynamics and Improved TOPSIS Model Tracking biodiversity footprints embodied in the global supply chains of agricultural commodities: the examples of Germany and China Internal phosphorus loading drives long-term eutrophication trends and short-term deviations in a shallow hypertrophic lake
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1