An experiment on creativity in virtual teams

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2025.106926
Christian Grund, Christine Harbring, Lisa Klinkenberg
{"title":"An experiment on creativity in virtual teams","authors":"Christian Grund,&nbsp;Christine Harbring,&nbsp;Lisa Klinkenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2025.106926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The organization of work and the characteristics of tasks have undergone considerable changes in recent years. The developments include (i) an increased relevance of virtual teams and (ii) a higher demand for non-routine tasks in organizations, including creativity. Existing research on creative teams focuses on one-shot or existing teams, overlooking the importance of the formation phase of teams. This formation phase is particularly relevant for teams working in a virtual workplace setting, where communication and coordination may be constrained by the environment. Next to virtual work, hybrid working models ascend, also for teams. Therefore, we examine the influence of workplace settings and changes in these settings on creative performance of teams. We also investigate whether the individuals’ ability to choose their workplace affects creative performance. We answer those questions by conducting a 2-phase experiment with dyadic teams in the lab and online to model a presence and a virtual workplace setting and account for the formation phase of teams. We implemented the “Unusual-Uses Task” as non-routine creative task. Our results showed that teams working in presence outperform those working online. Interestingly, working at least one phase in presence induces higher creative performance than entirely working online, underscoring the relevance of hybrid workplace settings. Moreover, no significant effects of self-selection on performance were found.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 106926"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268125000460","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The organization of work and the characteristics of tasks have undergone considerable changes in recent years. The developments include (i) an increased relevance of virtual teams and (ii) a higher demand for non-routine tasks in organizations, including creativity. Existing research on creative teams focuses on one-shot or existing teams, overlooking the importance of the formation phase of teams. This formation phase is particularly relevant for teams working in a virtual workplace setting, where communication and coordination may be constrained by the environment. Next to virtual work, hybrid working models ascend, also for teams. Therefore, we examine the influence of workplace settings and changes in these settings on creative performance of teams. We also investigate whether the individuals’ ability to choose their workplace affects creative performance. We answer those questions by conducting a 2-phase experiment with dyadic teams in the lab and online to model a presence and a virtual workplace setting and account for the formation phase of teams. We implemented the “Unusual-Uses Task” as non-routine creative task. Our results showed that teams working in presence outperform those working online. Interestingly, working at least one phase in presence induces higher creative performance than entirely working online, underscoring the relevance of hybrid workplace settings. Moreover, no significant effects of self-selection on performance were found.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于虚拟团队创造力的实验
近年来,工作的组织和任务的特点发生了相当大的变化。这些发展包括(i)虚拟团队的相关性增加和(ii)对组织中非常规任务的更高需求,包括创造力。现有的关于创意团队的研究主要集中在一次性或现有团队上,忽视了团队形成阶段的重要性。这个形成阶段与在虚拟工作环境中工作的团队特别相关,在虚拟工作环境中,沟通和协调可能受到环境的限制。除了虚拟工作之外,混合工作模式也适用于团队。因此,我们研究了工作场所设置和这些设置的变化对团队创造性表现的影响。我们还调查了个人选择工作场所的能力是否会影响创造性表现。我们通过在实验室和在线上对二元团队进行两阶段的实验来回答这些问题,以模拟存在和虚拟工作场所设置,并解释团队的形成阶段。我们将“特殊用途任务”作为非常规的创造性任务来实施。我们的研究结果表明,在现场工作的团队比在线工作的团队表现得更好。有趣的是,与完全在线工作相比,至少在现场工作一个阶段会产生更高的创造性表现,这突显了混合工作环境的相关性。此外,自我选择对绩效没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization is devoted to theoretical and empirical research concerning economic decision, organization and behavior and to economic change in all its aspects. Its specific purposes are to foster an improved understanding of how human cognitive, computational and informational characteristics influence the working of economic organizations and market economies and how an economy structural features lead to various types of micro and macro behavior, to changing patterns of development and to institutional evolution. Research with these purposes that explore the interrelations of economics with other disciplines such as biology, psychology, law, anthropology, sociology and mathematics is particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Do heterogenous beliefs drive the US business cycles? Culture and social influence: Evidence from online reviews An experimental comparison of conventional and final offer arbitration Land assembly and negative externalities: An experimental investigation of NIMBY projects The rise and fall of ideas’ popularity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1