Measuring the spatial and size polycentricity: An empirical study of China's urban agglomerations using population distribution data

IF 4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Applied Geography Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103529
Hanqiu Yue , Yongting Pan , Qingfeng Guan
{"title":"Measuring the spatial and size polycentricity: An empirical study of China's urban agglomerations using population distribution data","authors":"Hanqiu Yue ,&nbsp;Yongting Pan ,&nbsp;Qingfeng Guan","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The development of cities has distinguishing regional characteristics, which makes researchers and decision makers carry out studies and discussions on polycentricity. Current research quantifies morphological polycentricity from the perspective of the center's importance, ignoring their spatial distribution pattern. To fill this gap, this work attempts to provide a two-part framework that measures regional morphological polycentricity: (1) both spatial and size polycentricity are measured by center's influence sphere and standard deviation, respectively, to provide a comprehensive assessment of morphological polycentricity; (2) groups of regions with similar morphological features are identified through K-means clustering by combing spatial polycentricity, size polycentricity and three additional factors. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed framework, we conducted an empirical investigation in 20 Chinese urban agglomerations using the LandScan population distribution data. The findings validate the hypothesis that the distribution of centers cannot be fully characterized only from either spatial or size polycentricity perspective. Furthermore, the 20 urban agglomerations were classified into various categories with distinct morphological characteristics. The results are conducive not only to providing decision-making suggestions for diverse urban agglomerations, but also to further probing into the relationship between them and social issues within the realm of applied geography.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48396,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geography","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 103529"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622825000244","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of cities has distinguishing regional characteristics, which makes researchers and decision makers carry out studies and discussions on polycentricity. Current research quantifies morphological polycentricity from the perspective of the center's importance, ignoring their spatial distribution pattern. To fill this gap, this work attempts to provide a two-part framework that measures regional morphological polycentricity: (1) both spatial and size polycentricity are measured by center's influence sphere and standard deviation, respectively, to provide a comprehensive assessment of morphological polycentricity; (2) groups of regions with similar morphological features are identified through K-means clustering by combing spatial polycentricity, size polycentricity and three additional factors. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed framework, we conducted an empirical investigation in 20 Chinese urban agglomerations using the LandScan population distribution data. The findings validate the hypothesis that the distribution of centers cannot be fully characterized only from either spatial or size polycentricity perspective. Furthermore, the 20 urban agglomerations were classified into various categories with distinct morphological characteristics. The results are conducive not only to providing decision-making suggestions for diverse urban agglomerations, but also to further probing into the relationship between them and social issues within the realm of applied geography.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Geography
Applied Geography GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: Applied Geography is a journal devoted to the publication of research which utilizes geographic approaches (human, physical, nature-society and GIScience) to resolve human problems that have a spatial dimension. These problems may be related to the assessment, management and allocation of the world physical and/or human resources. The underlying rationale of the journal is that only through a clear understanding of the relevant societal, physical, and coupled natural-humans systems can we resolve such problems. Papers are invited on any theme involving the application of geographical theory and methodology in the resolution of human problems.
期刊最新文献
Technology transfer in asymmetric innovation corridors: Theory and empirical evidence from China Quantifying the anthropogenic sensitivity of ecological patterns in arid urban agglomeration Exploration of ecological compensation standard: Based on ecosystem service flow path The economic geography of beer production in the context of trade liberalization and economic nationalism: The Mexican experience Habituating urbanity: The (re)production of socio-spatial configurations on/offline through coworking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1