Analysis of earthquake detection using deep learning: Evaluating reliability and uncertainty in prediction methods

IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Geosciences Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1016/j.cageo.2025.105877
Sebastián Gamboa-Chacón , Esteban Meneses , Esteban J. Chaves
{"title":"Analysis of earthquake detection using deep learning: Evaluating reliability and uncertainty in prediction methods","authors":"Sebastián Gamboa-Chacón ,&nbsp;Esteban Meneses ,&nbsp;Esteban J. Chaves","doi":"10.1016/j.cageo.2025.105877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates the performance and reliability of earthquake detection using the EQTransformer, a novel deep learning program that is widely used in seismological observatories and research for enhancing earthquake catalogs. We test the EQTransformer capabilities and uncertainties using seismic data from the Volcanological and Seismological Observatory of Costa Rica and compare two detection options: the simplified method (MseedPredictor) and the complex method (Predictor), the latter incorporating Monte Carlo Dropout, to assess their reproducibility and uncertainty in identifying seismic events. Our analysis focuses on 24 h-duration data that began on February 18, 2023, following a magnitude 5.5 mainshock. Notably, we observed that sequential experiments with identical data and parametrization yield different detections and a varying number of events as a function of time. The results demonstrate that the complex method, which leverages iterative dropout, consistently yields more reproducible and reliable detections than the simplified method, which shows greater variability and is more prone to false positives. This study highlights the critical importance of method selection in deep learning models for seismic event detection, emphasizing the need for rigorous evaluation of detection algorithms to ensure accurate and consistent earthquake catalogs and interpretations. Our findings provide valuable insights for the application of AI tools in seismology, particularly in enhancing the precision and reliability of seismic monitoring efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55221,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Geosciences","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 105877"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098300425000275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance and reliability of earthquake detection using the EQTransformer, a novel deep learning program that is widely used in seismological observatories and research for enhancing earthquake catalogs. We test the EQTransformer capabilities and uncertainties using seismic data from the Volcanological and Seismological Observatory of Costa Rica and compare two detection options: the simplified method (MseedPredictor) and the complex method (Predictor), the latter incorporating Monte Carlo Dropout, to assess their reproducibility and uncertainty in identifying seismic events. Our analysis focuses on 24 h-duration data that began on February 18, 2023, following a magnitude 5.5 mainshock. Notably, we observed that sequential experiments with identical data and parametrization yield different detections and a varying number of events as a function of time. The results demonstrate that the complex method, which leverages iterative dropout, consistently yields more reproducible and reliable detections than the simplified method, which shows greater variability and is more prone to false positives. This study highlights the critical importance of method selection in deep learning models for seismic event detection, emphasizing the need for rigorous evaluation of detection algorithms to ensure accurate and consistent earthquake catalogs and interpretations. Our findings provide valuable insights for the application of AI tools in seismology, particularly in enhancing the precision and reliability of seismic monitoring efforts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用深度学习分析地震探测:评估预测方法的可靠性和不确定性
本研究使用EQTransformer评估地震探测的性能和可靠性,EQTransformer是一种新型的深度学习程序,广泛用于地震观测站和研究中,用于增强地震目录。我们使用哥斯达黎加火山和地震学观测站的地震数据测试了EQTransformer的能力和不确定性,并比较了两种检测方法:简化方法(MseedPredictor)和复杂方法(Predictor),后者结合了蒙特卡罗Dropout,以评估它们在识别地震事件方面的可重复性和不确定性。我们的分析重点是2023年2月18日开始的24小时持续时间数据,当时发生了5.5级主震。值得注意的是,我们观察到具有相同数据和参数化的连续实验产生不同的检测结果和不同数量的事件作为时间的函数。结果表明,利用迭代dropout的复杂方法始终比简化方法产生更高的可重复性和更可靠的检测,简化方法显示出更大的变异性,更容易出现假阳性。本研究强调了在地震事件检测的深度学习模型中选择方法的重要性,强调了对检测算法进行严格评估的必要性,以确保准确和一致的地震目录和解释。我们的研究结果为人工智能工具在地震学中的应用提供了有价值的见解,特别是在提高地震监测工作的精度和可靠性方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Geosciences
Computers & Geosciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
6.80%
发文量
164
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Geosciences publishes high impact, original research at the interface between Computer Sciences and Geosciences. Publications should apply modern computer science paradigms, whether computational or informatics-based, to address problems in the geosciences.
期刊最新文献
MPCSD-Net: A multi-scale physically constrained self-distillation method for super-resolution reconstruction GAN-MT1DInv: A physics-informed generative adversarial network for magnetotelluric inversion Reliability aware multimodal detection of active landslides via evidence theoretic fusion of InSAR, optical, and DEM data pyParkO: A Python implementation of the Parker–Oldenburg method for seafloor topography inversion from gravity anomalies Integrating TRIGRS-based physical labels with stacking deep learning for landslide susceptibility prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1