Home care visits: The key to reducing loss to follow-up in emergency colorectal surgery

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2025.109151
Wardah Rafaqat MD , Vahe S. Panossian MD , Christopher Alba BS , Yasmin Arda MD , Ikemsinachi C. Nzenwa MD , May Abiad MD , Emanuele Lagazzi MD , Haytham M.A. Kaafarani MD, MPH , George C. Velmahos MD, PhD , Michael P. DeWane MD
{"title":"Home care visits: The key to reducing loss to follow-up in emergency colorectal surgery","authors":"Wardah Rafaqat MD ,&nbsp;Vahe S. Panossian MD ,&nbsp;Christopher Alba BS ,&nbsp;Yasmin Arda MD ,&nbsp;Ikemsinachi C. Nzenwa MD ,&nbsp;May Abiad MD ,&nbsp;Emanuele Lagazzi MD ,&nbsp;Haytham M.A. Kaafarani MD, MPH ,&nbsp;George C. Velmahos MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Michael P. DeWane MD","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Emergency colorectal surgery has a high incidence of postdischarge complications, and loss to follow-up can delay the identification of complications. Amid evolving postdischarge care practices, it is important to assess predictors of loss to follow-up. We aimed to characterize the predictors of loss to follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective institutional cohort study of patients ≥18 years undergoing emergency colorectal surgery at a tertiary hospital from 2016 to 2022. We excluded patients with in-hospital or 30-day mortality or a postoperative stay &gt;30 days. We defined loss to follow-up as the absence of a postdischarge 30-day in-person or telehealth visit. The predictors of loss to follow-up were evaluated using stepwise regression analysis. We performed a subgroup analysis evaluating predictors of loss to follow-up among patients discharged post-telehealth availability at our institution (March 2020).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 426 patients, of whom 95 (22.3%) were loss to follow-up and 58.9% were discharged post-telehealth availability. Almost one half of patients were female (52.3%), and the majority were of White race (89.2%), and non-Hispanic (92.0%). Being male, being discharged to a skilled nursing facility, and prolonged hospitalization were risk factors for loss to follow-up, whereas receiving home care visits was protective. Post-telehealth availability, being male, and prolonged hospitalization were risk factors for loss to follow-up, whereas receiving homecare visits was protective. Patients who had a follow-up visit were less likely to be readmitted to the hospital and have a visit to the emergency department.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Receiving home care visits was the most protective factor for preventing loss to follow-up. Living far from the hospital remained a risk factor even post-telehealth availability. High-risk patients may benefit from targeted interventions that include scheduled home care visits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 109151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606025000030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Emergency colorectal surgery has a high incidence of postdischarge complications, and loss to follow-up can delay the identification of complications. Amid evolving postdischarge care practices, it is important to assess predictors of loss to follow-up. We aimed to characterize the predictors of loss to follow-up.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective institutional cohort study of patients ≥18 years undergoing emergency colorectal surgery at a tertiary hospital from 2016 to 2022. We excluded patients with in-hospital or 30-day mortality or a postoperative stay >30 days. We defined loss to follow-up as the absence of a postdischarge 30-day in-person or telehealth visit. The predictors of loss to follow-up were evaluated using stepwise regression analysis. We performed a subgroup analysis evaluating predictors of loss to follow-up among patients discharged post-telehealth availability at our institution (March 2020).

Results

We included 426 patients, of whom 95 (22.3%) were loss to follow-up and 58.9% were discharged post-telehealth availability. Almost one half of patients were female (52.3%), and the majority were of White race (89.2%), and non-Hispanic (92.0%). Being male, being discharged to a skilled nursing facility, and prolonged hospitalization were risk factors for loss to follow-up, whereas receiving home care visits was protective. Post-telehealth availability, being male, and prolonged hospitalization were risk factors for loss to follow-up, whereas receiving homecare visits was protective. Patients who had a follow-up visit were less likely to be readmitted to the hospital and have a visit to the emergency department.

Conclusion

Receiving home care visits was the most protective factor for preventing loss to follow-up. Living far from the hospital remained a risk factor even post-telehealth availability. High-risk patients may benefit from targeted interventions that include scheduled home care visits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭护理访问:减少急诊结直肠手术随访损失的关键
背景急诊结直肠手术术后并发症发生率高,缺乏随访可能会延误并发症的发现。在不断发展的出院后护理实践中,评估随访损失的预测因素非常重要。我们的目的是描述随访损失的预测因素。方法对2016 - 2022年在某三级医院接受急诊结直肠手术的≥18岁患者进行回顾性机构队列研究。我们排除了住院或30天死亡率或术后住院30天的患者。我们将随访损失定义为出院后30天内没有亲自或远程医疗访问。采用逐步回归分析评估随访损失的预测因素。我们进行了一项亚组分析,评估了我们机构(2020年3月)远程医疗后出院患者随访损失的预测因素。结果纳入426例患者,其中95例(22.3%)失访,58.9%在远程医疗可用后出院。几乎一半的患者是女性(52.3%),大多数是白人(89.2%)和非西班牙裔(92.0%)。男性、出院到专业护理机构和长期住院是失去随访的风险因素,而接受家庭护理访问则具有保护作用。远程医疗后的可用性、男性和长期住院是失去随访的风险因素,而接受家庭护理访问则具有保护作用。接受随访的患者不太可能再次入院,也不太可能去急诊室。结论接受家庭护理是预防随访丢失的最重要保护因素。即使在远程医疗普及之后,居住地点远离医院仍然是一个风险因素。高风险患者可能受益于有针对性的干预措施,包括定期的家庭护理访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of a nomogram for early prediction of splenic infarction after minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study. Withdrawal of life support following interfacility transfer in older adults with traumatic brain injury. ERGO (ERGonomics in the Operating room) study: A cross-sectional international online survey. Contents Acknowledgments of Peer Reviewers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1