Experimental study of innovative steel beam-to-column joint under impact loading to mitigate progressive collapse

IF 6.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Journal of building engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112018
Damian Kukla , Aleksander Kozłowski , Bartosz Miller , Dominika Ziaja , Izabela Wójcik-Grząba , Sylwia Gubernat
{"title":"Experimental study of innovative steel beam-to-column joint under impact loading to mitigate progressive collapse","authors":"Damian Kukla ,&nbsp;Aleksander Kozłowski ,&nbsp;Bartosz Miller ,&nbsp;Dominika Ziaja ,&nbsp;Izabela Wójcik-Grząba ,&nbsp;Sylwia Gubernat","doi":"10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The structural response of two steel substructures in a beam-column-beam arrangement under accidental loads was studied in the experimental impact tests. Both versions of the bolted joint, the classic flush end-plate and the innovative one were tested with the same impact energy level applied by dropping the free-falling steel-concrete package. Special measuring equipment dedicated to dynamic investigations was used. The main aim of the tests was to examine the strains and deformations in order to determine dynamic parameters in steel members and bolts. The strain rate and the dynamic impact factor (DIF) were calculated based on the experimental test results. Johnson-Cook, Cowper-Symonds and Malvar-Crawford models were used to determine the DIF. The comparison and discussion of results for both specimens are presented in the paper. The results show that steel bolted flush end-plate joints and innovative joints exhibit high structural ductility under impact loads. The resistance of the flush end-plate joint is limited by the fracture of the bolts. In comparison, the resistance of the innovative joint was not reached during the tests, which indicates significant reserves of the load capacity in this type of joint.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of building engineering","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 112018"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of building engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710225002542","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The structural response of two steel substructures in a beam-column-beam arrangement under accidental loads was studied in the experimental impact tests. Both versions of the bolted joint, the classic flush end-plate and the innovative one were tested with the same impact energy level applied by dropping the free-falling steel-concrete package. Special measuring equipment dedicated to dynamic investigations was used. The main aim of the tests was to examine the strains and deformations in order to determine dynamic parameters in steel members and bolts. The strain rate and the dynamic impact factor (DIF) were calculated based on the experimental test results. Johnson-Cook, Cowper-Symonds and Malvar-Crawford models were used to determine the DIF. The comparison and discussion of results for both specimens are presented in the paper. The results show that steel bolted flush end-plate joints and innovative joints exhibit high structural ductility under impact loads. The resistance of the flush end-plate joint is limited by the fracture of the bolts. In comparison, the resistance of the innovative joint was not reached during the tests, which indicates significant reserves of the load capacity in this type of joint.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of building engineering
Journal of building engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1901
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Building Engineering is an interdisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of science and technology concerned with the whole life cycle of the built environment; from the design phase through to construction, operation, performance, maintenance and its deterioration.
期刊最新文献
A review of the repair measures for reinforced concrete affected by chloride ion corrosion Energy consumption prediction for office buildings: Performance evaluation and application of ensemble machine learning techniques Development and properties of lightweight concrete based on core-shell cold-bonded lightweight aggregate using epoxy resin as interfacial enhancer Mechanical properties and pore structure characterization of crumb rubber concrete using equal size replacement method Progressive collapse resistance of planar prestressed concrete frame with infill walls under corner column failure scenario
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1