The mediating role of academic stress, critical thinking and performance expectations in the influence of academic self-efficacy on AI dependence: Case study in college students

Benicio Gonzalo Acosta-Enriquez , Marco Agustín Arbulú Ballesteros , Maria de los Angeles Guzman Valle , Jahaira Eulalia Morales Angaspilco , Janet del Rosario Aquino Lalupú , Jessie Leila Bravo Jaico , Nilton César Germán Reyes , Roger Ernesto Alarcón García , Walter Esteban Janampa Castillo
{"title":"The mediating role of academic stress, critical thinking and performance expectations in the influence of academic self-efficacy on AI dependence: Case study in college students","authors":"Benicio Gonzalo Acosta-Enriquez ,&nbsp;Marco Agustín Arbulú Ballesteros ,&nbsp;Maria de los Angeles Guzman Valle ,&nbsp;Jahaira Eulalia Morales Angaspilco ,&nbsp;Janet del Rosario Aquino Lalupú ,&nbsp;Jessie Leila Bravo Jaico ,&nbsp;Nilton César Germán Reyes ,&nbsp;Roger Ernesto Alarcón García ,&nbsp;Walter Esteban Janampa Castillo","doi":"10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the mediating roles of academic stress, critical thinking, and performance expectations in the relationship between academic self-efficacy and AI dependency among university students. Data were collected via validated instruments and analyzed via structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in a cross-sectional study that included 676 students from six universities in northern Peru. The findings indicated that the relationship between academic self-efficacy and AI dependency was substantially mediated by academic stress (β = 0.398, p &lt; 0.001). Furthermore, this relationship is serially mediated by academic stress and performance expectations (β = 0.325, p &lt; 0.001). Academic self-efficacy also had a direct and significant effect on AI dependency (β = 0.444, p &lt; 0.001). Paths that utilized critical thinking as a mediator were not statistically significant, contrary to expectations. The model accounted for 58.9% of the variance in AI dependency. These results indicate that students' levels of AI dependency are significantly influenced by psychological factors, including academic stress and performance expectations. This research contributes to the comprehension of the psychological processes that underlie the adoption of AI in higher education. It also offers valuable insights for the development of interventions that foster balanced AI use while enhancing academic self-efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34469,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X25000219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the mediating roles of academic stress, critical thinking, and performance expectations in the relationship between academic self-efficacy and AI dependency among university students. Data were collected via validated instruments and analyzed via structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in a cross-sectional study that included 676 students from six universities in northern Peru. The findings indicated that the relationship between academic self-efficacy and AI dependency was substantially mediated by academic stress (β = 0.398, p < 0.001). Furthermore, this relationship is serially mediated by academic stress and performance expectations (β = 0.325, p < 0.001). Academic self-efficacy also had a direct and significant effect on AI dependency (β = 0.444, p < 0.001). Paths that utilized critical thinking as a mediator were not statistically significant, contrary to expectations. The model accounted for 58.9% of the variance in AI dependency. These results indicate that students' levels of AI dependency are significantly influenced by psychological factors, including academic stress and performance expectations. This research contributes to the comprehension of the psychological processes that underlie the adoption of AI in higher education. It also offers valuable insights for the development of interventions that foster balanced AI use while enhancing academic self-efficacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学业压力、批判性思维和绩效期望在学业自我效能感对人工智能依赖影响中的中介作用:以大学生为例
本研究探讨了学业压力、批判性思维和绩效期望在大学生学业自我效能感与人工智能依赖关系中的中介作用。数据通过经过验证的仪器收集,并通过结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)在一项横断面研究中进行分析,该研究包括来自秘鲁北部六所大学的676名学生。研究结果表明,学业自我效能感与人工智能依赖之间的关系主要由学业压力介导(β = 0.398, p <;0.001)。此外,学业压力和学业表现期望在学业压力和学业表现期望之间具有中介作用(β = 0.325, p <;0.001)。学业自我效能感对AI依赖也有直接且显著的影响(β = 0.444, p <;0.001)。与预期相反,使用批判性思维作为中介的路径在统计上不显着。该模型占人工智能依赖性方差的58.9%。这些结果表明,学生对人工智能的依赖程度受到学业压力和成绩预期等心理因素的显著影响。这项研究有助于理解在高等教育中采用人工智能的心理过程。它还为开发干预措施提供了有价值的见解,这些干预措施可以促进人工智能的平衡使用,同时提高学术自我效能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Conversational AI in children's home literacy learning: effectiveness, advantages, challenges, and family perception Enhancing AI literacy for educators: Where to start and to what end? Artificial intelligence literacy at school: A systematic review with a focus on psychological foundations Large language models for education: An open-source paradigm for automated Q&A in the graduate classroom Generative AI in higher education: A bibliometric review of emerging trends, power dynamics, and global research landscapes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1