The mediating role of academic stress, critical thinking and performance expectations in the influence of academic self-efficacy on AI dependence: Case study in college students
Benicio Gonzalo Acosta-Enriquez , Marco Agustín Arbulú Ballesteros , Maria de los Angeles Guzman Valle , Jahaira Eulalia Morales Angaspilco , Janet del Rosario Aquino Lalupú , Jessie Leila Bravo Jaico , Nilton César Germán Reyes , Roger Ernesto Alarcón García , Walter Esteban Janampa Castillo
{"title":"The mediating role of academic stress, critical thinking and performance expectations in the influence of academic self-efficacy on AI dependence: Case study in college students","authors":"Benicio Gonzalo Acosta-Enriquez , Marco Agustín Arbulú Ballesteros , Maria de los Angeles Guzman Valle , Jahaira Eulalia Morales Angaspilco , Janet del Rosario Aquino Lalupú , Jessie Leila Bravo Jaico , Nilton César Germán Reyes , Roger Ernesto Alarcón García , Walter Esteban Janampa Castillo","doi":"10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the mediating roles of academic stress, critical thinking, and performance expectations in the relationship between academic self-efficacy and AI dependency among university students. Data were collected via validated instruments and analyzed via structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in a cross-sectional study that included 676 students from six universities in northern Peru. The findings indicated that the relationship between academic self-efficacy and AI dependency was substantially mediated by academic stress (β = 0.398, p < 0.001). Furthermore, this relationship is serially mediated by academic stress and performance expectations (β = 0.325, p < 0.001). Academic self-efficacy also had a direct and significant effect on AI dependency (β = 0.444, p < 0.001). Paths that utilized critical thinking as a mediator were not statistically significant, contrary to expectations. The model accounted for 58.9% of the variance in AI dependency. These results indicate that students' levels of AI dependency are significantly influenced by psychological factors, including academic stress and performance expectations. This research contributes to the comprehension of the psychological processes that underlie the adoption of AI in higher education. It also offers valuable insights for the development of interventions that foster balanced AI use while enhancing academic self-efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34469,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X25000219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigated the mediating roles of academic stress, critical thinking, and performance expectations in the relationship between academic self-efficacy and AI dependency among university students. Data were collected via validated instruments and analyzed via structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in a cross-sectional study that included 676 students from six universities in northern Peru. The findings indicated that the relationship between academic self-efficacy and AI dependency was substantially mediated by academic stress (β = 0.398, p < 0.001). Furthermore, this relationship is serially mediated by academic stress and performance expectations (β = 0.325, p < 0.001). Academic self-efficacy also had a direct and significant effect on AI dependency (β = 0.444, p < 0.001). Paths that utilized critical thinking as a mediator were not statistically significant, contrary to expectations. The model accounted for 58.9% of the variance in AI dependency. These results indicate that students' levels of AI dependency are significantly influenced by psychological factors, including academic stress and performance expectations. This research contributes to the comprehension of the psychological processes that underlie the adoption of AI in higher education. It also offers valuable insights for the development of interventions that foster balanced AI use while enhancing academic self-efficacy.
本研究探讨了学业压力、批判性思维和绩效期望在大学生学业自我效能感与人工智能依赖关系中的中介作用。数据通过经过验证的仪器收集,并通过结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)在一项横断面研究中进行分析,该研究包括来自秘鲁北部六所大学的676名学生。研究结果表明,学业自我效能感与人工智能依赖之间的关系主要由学业压力介导(β = 0.398, p <;0.001)。此外,学业压力和学业表现期望在学业压力和学业表现期望之间具有中介作用(β = 0.325, p <;0.001)。学业自我效能感对AI依赖也有直接且显著的影响(β = 0.444, p <;0.001)。与预期相反,使用批判性思维作为中介的路径在统计上不显着。该模型占人工智能依赖性方差的58.9%。这些结果表明,学生对人工智能的依赖程度受到学业压力和成绩预期等心理因素的显著影响。这项研究有助于理解在高等教育中采用人工智能的心理过程。它还为开发干预措施提供了有价值的见解,这些干预措施可以促进人工智能的平衡使用,同时提高学术自我效能。