Appeals to environmental protection and farmer adoption of sustainable natural resource management – A case study of Kaya, Burkina Faso

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124415
D.A. Carroll II , K.R. Wilson , B.L. Rogers , J. Coates , T.S. Griffin
{"title":"Appeals to environmental protection and farmer adoption of sustainable natural resource management – A case study of Kaya, Burkina Faso","authors":"D.A. Carroll II ,&nbsp;K.R. Wilson ,&nbsp;B.L. Rogers ,&nbsp;J. Coates ,&nbsp;T.S. Griffin","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To address issues of soil degradation, deforestation, and on-farm biodiversity loss, development programs in Center North Region of Burkina Faso have traditionally recommended a package of natural resources management practices aimed at conserving soil water and organic matter content, restoring soil health and biodiversity, and preventing erosion. These practices, which include stone bunds, zaï (planting pits), half-moons, agroforestry, vegetation bands, and other similar techniques, exhibit varying levels of complexity and resource intensiveness. While general knowledge about the importance of on-farm natural resource management is widespread in the region, less is known regarding how specific appeals to environmental protection from development programs influence adoption among farmers. Additionally, more information is needed about specific characteristics of individual techniques that either encourage or discourage adoption, including the innovation attributes described by Diffusion of Innovation theory: observability, trialability, relative advantage, complexity, and compatibility. We used quantitative household survey data, focus groups, and key informant interviews to evaluate farmer knowledge and perceptions of these practices, as well as the factors that impeded or facilitated their adoption. We found that technical complexity was an issue for half-moons; additionally, farmers found stone bunds to be incompatible with their production systems, as they lacked access to a vehicle for transporting stones. Practices that create more permanent structures on the land, such as tree-planting and stone bunds, were more difficult for farmers to trial and adopt, especially those farming on rented or borrowed land. In contrast, less resource-intensive practices which produced tangible short-term were more highly adopted, with zaï as the foremost example. Future research should focus on how development programs can build more effective sustainability frameworks that valorize existing indigenous practices, as well as how to substitute resource-intensive practices with practices that require fewer resources, such as switching stone bunds for vegetation bands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"376 ","pages":"Article 124415"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725003913","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To address issues of soil degradation, deforestation, and on-farm biodiversity loss, development programs in Center North Region of Burkina Faso have traditionally recommended a package of natural resources management practices aimed at conserving soil water and organic matter content, restoring soil health and biodiversity, and preventing erosion. These practices, which include stone bunds, zaï (planting pits), half-moons, agroforestry, vegetation bands, and other similar techniques, exhibit varying levels of complexity and resource intensiveness. While general knowledge about the importance of on-farm natural resource management is widespread in the region, less is known regarding how specific appeals to environmental protection from development programs influence adoption among farmers. Additionally, more information is needed about specific characteristics of individual techniques that either encourage or discourage adoption, including the innovation attributes described by Diffusion of Innovation theory: observability, trialability, relative advantage, complexity, and compatibility. We used quantitative household survey data, focus groups, and key informant interviews to evaluate farmer knowledge and perceptions of these practices, as well as the factors that impeded or facilitated their adoption. We found that technical complexity was an issue for half-moons; additionally, farmers found stone bunds to be incompatible with their production systems, as they lacked access to a vehicle for transporting stones. Practices that create more permanent structures on the land, such as tree-planting and stone bunds, were more difficult for farmers to trial and adopt, especially those farming on rented or borrowed land. In contrast, less resource-intensive practices which produced tangible short-term were more highly adopted, with zaï as the foremost example. Future research should focus on how development programs can build more effective sustainability frameworks that valorize existing indigenous practices, as well as how to substitute resource-intensive practices with practices that require fewer resources, such as switching stone bunds for vegetation bands.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Appeals to environmental protection and farmer adoption of sustainable natural resource management – A case study of Kaya, Burkina Faso Combined effect of landuse/landcover and climate change projection on the spatiotemporal streamflow response in cryosphere catchment in the Tibetan Plateau Sustainable carbon materials from biowaste for the removal of organophosphorus pesticides, dyes, and antibiotics Depicting, spatializing, and decoupling the impact of human activities on soil erosion in the hilly red soil region of southern China from the perspective of soil erosion influence factors One-pot polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production from Cerbera odollam (sea mango) oil using Pseudomonas resinovorans: Optimal fermentation design and mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1