{"title":"Renewable energy portfolio in Mexico for Industry 5.0 and SDGs: Hydrogen, wind, or solar?","authors":"Moein Khazaei , Fatemeh Gholian-Jouybari , Mahdi Davari Dolatabadi , Aryan Pourebrahimi Alamdari , Hamidreza Eskandari , Mostafa Hajiaghaei-Keshteli","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite a surge in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Mexico, like nearshoring, the slow growth in international investment in renewables challenges the country's progress in achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) related to clean energy. To the best of current knowledge, this research is one of the first to explore the integration of renewable energy (Green/Blue/Turquoise Hydrogen, Solar, and Wind plants) in Mexico, emphasizing a diverse portfolio of projects aligned with SDGs and Industry 5.0. While previous works have focused on the nexus between energy, Industry 4.0, and sustainability, the present study advances this discourse by incorporating Industry 5.0 principles and a comprehensive methodological approach. Through a comprehensive methodology involving Value-Focused Thinking (VFT), fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), and multi-objective mathematical programming, the study identifies key criteria encompassing social, economic, environmental, and technological dimensions. The resulting criteria form a robust framework for evaluating project sustainability. The fuzzy DEMATEL analysis reveals intricate interrelations among criteria, emphasizing the need for balanced considerations. Results highlighted job creation, income equality, and microfinance support as key social considerations, while energy-related criteria emphasized sustainable practices. The proposed multi-objective programming model and COmbined COmpromise SOlution (COCOSO) method facilitated the selection of eight projects, with one project as the top-ranked option across various scoring strategies. Overall, this research provides a nuanced roadmap for effective decision-making in renewable energy projects, offering insights into project strengths, weaknesses, and potential areas for improvement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 115420"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125000930","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite a surge in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Mexico, like nearshoring, the slow growth in international investment in renewables challenges the country's progress in achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) related to clean energy. To the best of current knowledge, this research is one of the first to explore the integration of renewable energy (Green/Blue/Turquoise Hydrogen, Solar, and Wind plants) in Mexico, emphasizing a diverse portfolio of projects aligned with SDGs and Industry 5.0. While previous works have focused on the nexus between energy, Industry 4.0, and sustainability, the present study advances this discourse by incorporating Industry 5.0 principles and a comprehensive methodological approach. Through a comprehensive methodology involving Value-Focused Thinking (VFT), fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), and multi-objective mathematical programming, the study identifies key criteria encompassing social, economic, environmental, and technological dimensions. The resulting criteria form a robust framework for evaluating project sustainability. The fuzzy DEMATEL analysis reveals intricate interrelations among criteria, emphasizing the need for balanced considerations. Results highlighted job creation, income equality, and microfinance support as key social considerations, while energy-related criteria emphasized sustainable practices. The proposed multi-objective programming model and COmbined COmpromise SOlution (COCOSO) method facilitated the selection of eight projects, with one project as the top-ranked option across various scoring strategies. Overall, this research provides a nuanced roadmap for effective decision-making in renewable energy projects, offering insights into project strengths, weaknesses, and potential areas for improvement.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.