“Because I couldn't understand and respond”: A mixed-method study examining the impact of language barriers on patient experiences of intensive care unit outreach team care
Cheryl Power RN, MN Adv Prac , Kylie O’Neill RN, MN , Shu-Kay Ng BSc, PhD , Edward Berry BN, Grad. Cert. Intens Care Nurs., RN , Matthew Grigg BSc, MBBS(Hons1), FCICM, FRACP , Gerald (Ged) Williams RN, MHA, LLM, FAAN, FACCCN , Adelene Luong BMedSc , Melissa J. Bloomer RN, PhD, FACCCN
{"title":"“Because I couldn't understand and respond”: A mixed-method study examining the impact of language barriers on patient experiences of intensive care unit outreach team care","authors":"Cheryl Power RN, MN Adv Prac , Kylie O’Neill RN, MN , Shu-Kay Ng BSc, PhD , Edward Berry BN, Grad. Cert. Intens Care Nurs., RN , Matthew Grigg BSc, MBBS(Hons1), FCICM, FRACP , Gerald (Ged) Williams RN, MHA, LLM, FAAN, FACCCN , Adelene Luong BMedSc , Melissa J. Bloomer RN, PhD, FACCCN","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Almost 10% of hospitalised patients experience acute deterioration requiring emergency intervention. Language barriers can impede patient assessment and health outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of adult inpatients whose preferred language was not English, who received care from the intensive care unit (ICU) outreach team.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An explanatory sequential two-phase mixed-method design was used. A retrospective audit was undertaken to explore characteristics of and outcomes for recipients of ICU outreach team care, according to preferred language. In phase two, interpreter-mediated interviews were conducted with former patients whose preferred language was not English to explore their experience of critical illness and care by the ICU outreach team.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 4234 inpatients who received care from the ICU outreach team in 2022, there was a mean of 3.54 episodes of care (1–565) per patient. Those whose preferred language was not English had a higher proportion of admissions from the emergency department and were more likely to have a medical emergency team call as their first outreach episode of care but less likely to be admitted to the ICU. Vietnamese and Mandarin were the next most common languages spoken after English. Twenty-two former patients or delegated relatives were interviewed. Not all recalled receiving care from the ICU outreach team. There was strong support for involvement of professional interpreters for critical conversations and to aid autonomy. Family members acted as lay interpreters and fulfilled familial and cultural obligations, but visitor restrictions impeded this.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patient deterioration requires an emergent response. This research demonstrates the importance of identifying and overcoming language barriers for patients in a way that protects and preserves patient autonomy and ensures information accuracy. Where time and the patient's condition allows, use of professional interpreters must become the norm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":"38 3","pages":"Article 101198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1036731425000281","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Almost 10% of hospitalised patients experience acute deterioration requiring emergency intervention. Language barriers can impede patient assessment and health outcomes.
Objective
The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of adult inpatients whose preferred language was not English, who received care from the intensive care unit (ICU) outreach team.
Methods
An explanatory sequential two-phase mixed-method design was used. A retrospective audit was undertaken to explore characteristics of and outcomes for recipients of ICU outreach team care, according to preferred language. In phase two, interpreter-mediated interviews were conducted with former patients whose preferred language was not English to explore their experience of critical illness and care by the ICU outreach team.
Results
From 4234 inpatients who received care from the ICU outreach team in 2022, there was a mean of 3.54 episodes of care (1–565) per patient. Those whose preferred language was not English had a higher proportion of admissions from the emergency department and were more likely to have a medical emergency team call as their first outreach episode of care but less likely to be admitted to the ICU. Vietnamese and Mandarin were the next most common languages spoken after English. Twenty-two former patients or delegated relatives were interviewed. Not all recalled receiving care from the ICU outreach team. There was strong support for involvement of professional interpreters for critical conversations and to aid autonomy. Family members acted as lay interpreters and fulfilled familial and cultural obligations, but visitor restrictions impeded this.
Conclusion
Patient deterioration requires an emergent response. This research demonstrates the importance of identifying and overcoming language barriers for patients in a way that protects and preserves patient autonomy and ensures information accuracy. Where time and the patient's condition allows, use of professional interpreters must become the norm.
期刊介绍:
Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.