“Because I couldn't understand and respond”: A mixed-method study examining the impact of language barriers on patient experiences of intensive care unit outreach team care

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Australian Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101198
Cheryl Power RN, MN Adv Prac , Kylie O’Neill RN, MN , Shu-Kay Ng BSc, PhD , Edward Berry BN, Grad. Cert. Intens Care Nurs., RN , Matthew Grigg BSc, MBBS(Hons1), FCICM, FRACP , Gerald (Ged) Williams RN, MHA, LLM, FAAN, FACCCN , Adelene Luong BMedSc , Melissa J. Bloomer RN, PhD, FACCCN
{"title":"“Because I couldn't understand and respond”: A mixed-method study examining the impact of language barriers on patient experiences of intensive care unit outreach team care","authors":"Cheryl Power RN, MN Adv Prac ,&nbsp;Kylie O’Neill RN, MN ,&nbsp;Shu-Kay Ng BSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Edward Berry BN, Grad. Cert. Intens Care Nurs., RN ,&nbsp;Matthew Grigg BSc, MBBS(Hons1), FCICM, FRACP ,&nbsp;Gerald (Ged) Williams RN, MHA, LLM, FAAN, FACCCN ,&nbsp;Adelene Luong BMedSc ,&nbsp;Melissa J. Bloomer RN, PhD, FACCCN","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Almost 10% of hospitalised patients experience acute deterioration requiring emergency intervention. Language barriers can impede patient assessment and health outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of adult inpatients whose preferred language was not English, who received care from the intensive care unit (ICU) outreach team.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An explanatory sequential two-phase mixed-method design was used. A retrospective audit was undertaken to explore characteristics of and outcomes for recipients of ICU outreach team care, according to preferred language. In phase two, interpreter-mediated interviews were conducted with former patients whose preferred language was not English to explore their experience of critical illness and care by the ICU outreach team.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 4234 inpatients who received care from the ICU outreach team in 2022, there was a mean of 3.54 episodes of care (1–565) per patient. Those whose preferred language was not English had a higher proportion of admissions from the emergency department and were more likely to have a medical emergency team call as their first outreach episode of care but less likely to be admitted to the ICU. Vietnamese and Mandarin were the next most common languages spoken after English. Twenty-two former patients or delegated relatives were interviewed. Not all recalled receiving care from the ICU outreach team. There was strong support for involvement of professional interpreters for critical conversations and to aid autonomy. Family members acted as lay interpreters and fulfilled familial and cultural obligations, but visitor restrictions impeded this.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patient deterioration requires an emergent response. This research demonstrates the importance of identifying and overcoming language barriers for patients in a way that protects and preserves patient autonomy and ensures information accuracy. Where time and the patient's condition allows, use of professional interpreters must become the norm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":"38 3","pages":"Article 101198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1036731425000281","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Almost 10% of hospitalised patients experience acute deterioration requiring emergency intervention. Language barriers can impede patient assessment and health outcomes.

Objective

The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of adult inpatients whose preferred language was not English, who received care from the intensive care unit (ICU) outreach team.

Methods

An explanatory sequential two-phase mixed-method design was used. A retrospective audit was undertaken to explore characteristics of and outcomes for recipients of ICU outreach team care, according to preferred language. In phase two, interpreter-mediated interviews were conducted with former patients whose preferred language was not English to explore their experience of critical illness and care by the ICU outreach team.

Results

From 4234 inpatients who received care from the ICU outreach team in 2022, there was a mean of 3.54 episodes of care (1–565) per patient. Those whose preferred language was not English had a higher proportion of admissions from the emergency department and were more likely to have a medical emergency team call as their first outreach episode of care but less likely to be admitted to the ICU. Vietnamese and Mandarin were the next most common languages spoken after English. Twenty-two former patients or delegated relatives were interviewed. Not all recalled receiving care from the ICU outreach team. There was strong support for involvement of professional interpreters for critical conversations and to aid autonomy. Family members acted as lay interpreters and fulfilled familial and cultural obligations, but visitor restrictions impeded this.

Conclusion

Patient deterioration requires an emergent response. This research demonstrates the importance of identifying and overcoming language barriers for patients in a way that protects and preserves patient autonomy and ensures information accuracy. Where time and the patient's condition allows, use of professional interpreters must become the norm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Wellbeing as perceived and experienced by intensive care unit nurses: An interpretive qualitative analysis Employer-provided wellbeing support for nurses working in intensive care units: A national cross-sectional study Understanding crisis needs among family caregivers of patients in critical care: A qualitative analysis Antidepressant use, but not polypharmacy, is associated with worse outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest in older people “Because I couldn't understand and respond”: A mixed-method study examining the impact of language barriers on patient experiences of intensive care unit outreach team care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1