Antony Kachappilly , Rosa Devanna , Miguel Torres-Torriti , Fernando Auat Cheein
{"title":"A cloud point methodology for evaluating the integrity risk of arboreal crop during field coverage of agricultural machinery","authors":"Antony Kachappilly , Rosa Devanna , Miguel Torres-Torriti , Fernando Auat Cheein","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2024.109844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Several countries around the world are currently facing the need to have a fully automated farming process. In the United Kingdom, for example, the government has acknowledged this need and named it <em>farmgate</em>. As part of such process, machinery is designed to traverse the field performing a previously given task, such as harvesting, seeding, herbicide management, among others, following an also previously given path (or way points). However, when traversing, and due to environment layout or vehicle manoeuvres, machinery might collide, damaging itself or affecting the crop’s health. To address this problem, in this work, we develop a methodology for the evaluation of the expected damage in a crop, when a path has been planned for the agricultural machinery. To this end, we use point cloud processing tools that allow us to account the hitting risks per each manoeuvre and, therefore, to make the proper corrections in the path planning process. Hence, after evaluation, we are able to minimise the damage of the crop. Our proposal is tested on an existing and publicly available dataset, named <em>CitrusFarm dataset</em>, using the dimensions of several commercially available tractors, such as John Deere 9R, New Holland T8.435 (76.2 cm SmartTrax), Case IH Magum<sup>TM</sup> 400 Rowtrac, and it can be extended to other platforms. The statistical results, show for example, that for the John Deere 9R tractor on the tested field, there is a 49.71% (sequence 04 from the dataset) and 87.27% (sequence 06) of risk of severely damaging the crop, whereas New Holland T8.435 tractor shows 34.34% (sequence 04) and 55.96% (sequence 06) and Case IH Magum<sup>TM</sup> 400 Rowtrac shows 33.17%(sequence 04) and 52.41% (sequence 06). A final case study is implemented where our approach is successfully part of the decision process in the placement of waypoints in an olive grove to minimise impacts. The later shows that our methodology can benefit machinery design and path planning for full coverage practices in agriculture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 109844"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169924012353","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Several countries around the world are currently facing the need to have a fully automated farming process. In the United Kingdom, for example, the government has acknowledged this need and named it farmgate. As part of such process, machinery is designed to traverse the field performing a previously given task, such as harvesting, seeding, herbicide management, among others, following an also previously given path (or way points). However, when traversing, and due to environment layout or vehicle manoeuvres, machinery might collide, damaging itself or affecting the crop’s health. To address this problem, in this work, we develop a methodology for the evaluation of the expected damage in a crop, when a path has been planned for the agricultural machinery. To this end, we use point cloud processing tools that allow us to account the hitting risks per each manoeuvre and, therefore, to make the proper corrections in the path planning process. Hence, after evaluation, we are able to minimise the damage of the crop. Our proposal is tested on an existing and publicly available dataset, named CitrusFarm dataset, using the dimensions of several commercially available tractors, such as John Deere 9R, New Holland T8.435 (76.2 cm SmartTrax), Case IH MagumTM 400 Rowtrac, and it can be extended to other platforms. The statistical results, show for example, that for the John Deere 9R tractor on the tested field, there is a 49.71% (sequence 04 from the dataset) and 87.27% (sequence 06) of risk of severely damaging the crop, whereas New Holland T8.435 tractor shows 34.34% (sequence 04) and 55.96% (sequence 06) and Case IH MagumTM 400 Rowtrac shows 33.17%(sequence 04) and 52.41% (sequence 06). A final case study is implemented where our approach is successfully part of the decision process in the placement of waypoints in an olive grove to minimise impacts. The later shows that our methodology can benefit machinery design and path planning for full coverage practices in agriculture.
世界上一些国家目前正面临着完全自动化农业过程的需求。例如,在英国,政府已经认识到这一需求,并将其命名为“农场门”。作为这一过程的一部分,机械被设计成沿着先前给定的路径(或路径点)遍历田地,执行先前给定的任务,如收获、播种、除草剂管理等。然而,在穿越时,由于环境布局或车辆操作,机械可能会发生碰撞,损坏自身或影响作物健康。为了解决这个问题,在这项工作中,我们开发了一种评估作物预期损害的方法,当农业机械规划了一条路径时。为此,我们使用点云处理工具,使我们能够考虑每次机动的撞击风险,因此,在路径规划过程中做出适当的纠正。因此,经过评估,我们能够将作物的损害降到最低。我们的建议是在一个现有的和公开可用的数据集上进行测试的,名为CitrusFarm数据集,使用几种商用拖拉机的尺寸,如约翰迪尔9R,新荷兰T8.435 (76.2 cm SmartTrax), Case IH MagumTM 400 Rowtrac,它可以扩展到其他平台。统计结果表明,试验田的约翰迪尔9R拖拉机严重损害作物的风险分别为49.71%(序列04)和87.27%(序列06),而新荷兰T8.435拖拉机的风险分别为34.34%(序列04)和55.96%(序列06),Case IH MagumTM 400 Rowtrac的风险分别为33.17%(序列04)和52.41%(序列06)。在最后的案例研究中,我们的方法成功地作为决策过程的一部分,在橄榄树林中放置航路点,以尽量减少影响。后者表明,我们的方法有利于农业全覆盖实践的机械设计和路径规划。
期刊介绍:
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.