‘Underestimation of fall risks by older adults: The need for professional evaluation to identify home hazards’

E.Y Ishigaki , A.S Passos , L.E.G Leme
{"title":"‘Underestimation of fall risks by older adults: The need for professional evaluation to identify home hazards’","authors":"E.Y Ishigaki ,&nbsp;A.S Passos ,&nbsp;L.E.G Leme","doi":"10.1016/j.aggp.2025.100128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Falls are a significant public health issue among older adults, often resulting in serious injuries and decreased quality of life. Approximately 30–50 % of falls are related to environmental factors, with 60 % occurring within the home.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to analyze the extent to which Brazilian older adults accurately perceive fall risks in their home environment, emphasizing the potential gap between self-perception and actual hazards.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>90 older adults were assessed through home visits using the Home Safety Self-Assessment Tool (HSSAT), an American instrument adapted for the Brazilian context. The HSSAT, a 67-item self-assessment tool covering nine household areas, was administered by trained researchers. Data were collected through both self-assessment by the older adults and assessments by healthcare professionals to analyze perception discrepancies. A test-retest analysis was also conducted with 30 participants.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results showed that older adults identified an average of 5.1 risk factors, whereas healthcare professionals identified 12.6 on average, indicating low to moderate agreement between the two groups. The highest risk areas were the bathroom (25.6 %) and kitchen (20.2 %) in the self-assessment, while professionals found additional risks, especially in the bedroom (15.5 %) and kitchen (13.4 %). In the test-retest analysis, only nine items showed good agreement. Still, the second assessment revealed higher scores, suggesting improved risk perception due to a potential educational effect of the initial evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings reveal that older adults significantly underestimate fall risks, amplifying the critical need for healthcare professionals to assess environmental hazards accurately.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100119,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus","volume":"2 1","pages":"Article 100128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950307825000104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Falls are a significant public health issue among older adults, often resulting in serious injuries and decreased quality of life. Approximately 30–50 % of falls are related to environmental factors, with 60 % occurring within the home.

Objective

This study aims to analyze the extent to which Brazilian older adults accurately perceive fall risks in their home environment, emphasizing the potential gap between self-perception and actual hazards.

Methods

90 older adults were assessed through home visits using the Home Safety Self-Assessment Tool (HSSAT), an American instrument adapted for the Brazilian context. The HSSAT, a 67-item self-assessment tool covering nine household areas, was administered by trained researchers. Data were collected through both self-assessment by the older adults and assessments by healthcare professionals to analyze perception discrepancies. A test-retest analysis was also conducted with 30 participants.

Results

Results showed that older adults identified an average of 5.1 risk factors, whereas healthcare professionals identified 12.6 on average, indicating low to moderate agreement between the two groups. The highest risk areas were the bathroom (25.6 %) and kitchen (20.2 %) in the self-assessment, while professionals found additional risks, especially in the bedroom (15.5 %) and kitchen (13.4 %). In the test-retest analysis, only nine items showed good agreement. Still, the second assessment revealed higher scores, suggesting improved risk perception due to a potential educational effect of the initial evaluation.

Conclusion

These findings reveal that older adults significantly underestimate fall risks, amplifying the critical need for healthcare professionals to assess environmental hazards accurately.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“老年人对跌倒风险的低估:需要专业评估来识别家庭危险”
跌倒是老年人的一个重大公共卫生问题,经常造成严重伤害和生活质量下降。大约30 - 50%的跌倒与环境因素有关,其中60%发生在家中。目的本研究旨在分析巴西老年人对家庭环境中跌倒风险的准确感知程度,强调自我感知与实际危险之间的潜在差距。方法采用家庭安全自我评估工具(HSSAT)对90名老年人进行家访评估,这是一种适用于巴西环境的美国工具。HSSAT是一个涵盖9个家庭领域的67项自我评估工具,由训练有素的研究人员管理。通过老年人的自我评估和医疗保健专业人员的评估来收集数据,以分析感知差异。对30名参与者进行了测试-再测试分析。结果结果显示,老年人平均识别5.1个危险因素,而医疗保健专业人员平均识别12.6个,表明两组之间的一致性较低至中等。在自我评估中,风险最高的区域是浴室(25.6%)和厨房(20.2%),而专业人士发现了额外的风险,尤其是卧室(15.5%)和厨房(13.4%)。在重测分析中,只有9个项目表现出良好的一致性。尽管如此,第二次评估显示出更高的分数,这表明由于初次评估的潜在教育效果,风险认知有所提高。结论老年人明显低估了跌倒风险,这加大了医疗保健专业人员准确评估环境危害的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A descriptive study of the annual mobility assessment Sleep medication use and higher odds of cognitive impairment in older adults: insights from the community-based YAHABA Study Understanding barriers and enablers of health insurance awareness among older adults in India: Insights from LASI, 2017–18, with a focus on migration status Associations between social capital, health status, and physical and social frailty among older adults: A cross-sectional analysis of the Gunma aging cohort Psychological and functional outcomes of a community-based physical activity program for older adults: A prospective study in Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1