ESG rating agencies and investors’ reactions to earnings news

IF 2.9 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100456
Qingyuan Li , Albert Tsang , Qiong Wu , Xi Xiong
{"title":"ESG rating agencies and investors’ reactions to earnings news","authors":"Qingyuan Li ,&nbsp;Albert Tsang ,&nbsp;Qiong Wu ,&nbsp;Xi Xiong","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine the effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) information provided by rating agencies on investors’ reactions to earnings news. Based on ESG ratings provided by three major rating agencies, we present evidence that firms’ earnings response coefficients (ERCs) are positively correlated with the initiation of coverage, intensity of coverage, and rating dispersion of ESG rating agencies. Our evidence further suggests that the positive effect of ESG information on ERCs is more pronounced for firms that operate within a weaker information environment. In addition, ESG rating agencies tend to play a more important role in strengthening the stock market reaction to positive earnings news than that to negative earnings news. We also document that the main effects are stronger for firms that have higher-quality ESG ratings and are covered by ESG rating agencies facing more intense competition. Collectively, our results support the view that the ESG information made available by ESG rating agencies significantly enhances the stock market reaction to earnings news by aiding investors’ assessment of firms’ future financial performance and earnings sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 1","pages":"Article 100456"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1815566925000037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine the effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) information provided by rating agencies on investors’ reactions to earnings news. Based on ESG ratings provided by three major rating agencies, we present evidence that firms’ earnings response coefficients (ERCs) are positively correlated with the initiation of coverage, intensity of coverage, and rating dispersion of ESG rating agencies. Our evidence further suggests that the positive effect of ESG information on ERCs is more pronounced for firms that operate within a weaker information environment. In addition, ESG rating agencies tend to play a more important role in strengthening the stock market reaction to positive earnings news than that to negative earnings news. We also document that the main effects are stronger for firms that have higher-quality ESG ratings and are covered by ESG rating agencies facing more intense competition. Collectively, our results support the view that the ESG information made available by ESG rating agencies significantly enhances the stock market reaction to earnings news by aiding investors’ assessment of firms’ future financial performance and earnings sustainability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ESG评级机构和投资者对收益消息的反应
我们研究了评级机构提供的环境、社会和治理(ESG)信息对投资者对收益新闻的反应的影响。基于三家主要评级机构提供的ESG评级,我们证明了企业的盈余反应系数(ERCs)与ESG评级机构的覆盖起始、覆盖强度和评级分散度呈正相关。我们的证据进一步表明,在信息环境较弱的公司中,ESG信息对erc的积极影响更为明显。此外,ESG评级机构在加强股市对正面收益消息的反应方面往往比在负面收益消息方面发挥更重要的作用。我们还证明,对于拥有更高质量ESG评级的公司,以及面临更激烈竞争的ESG评级机构所涵盖的公司,主要影响更强。总的来说,我们的研究结果支持这样的观点,即ESG评级机构提供的ESG信息通过帮助投资者评估公司未来的财务业绩和盈利可持续性,显著增强了股市对盈利消息的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Delisting reform and the information environment: Evidence from China Mars–Venus marriage: State-owned shareholders and corporate fraud in private firms The differential impact of audit fees on the value-relevance of financial reports for growing and contracting firms Editorial Board Visiting in the wrong time: Huangli and analysts’ bias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1