Katrin Sievert , Alexandru Stefan Stefanescu , Pauline Oeuvray , Bjarne Steffen
{"title":"The impact of financing structures on the cost of carbon dioxide transport","authors":"Katrin Sievert , Alexandru Stefan Stefanescu , Pauline Oeuvray , Bjarne Steffen","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The economic operation of carbon capture and storage (CCS) facilities hinges on the availability of CO<sub>2</sub> transport infrastructure, and the financing structure of new transport assets will affect CO<sub>2</sub> transport cost. Building on economic studies of infrastructure finance in other sectors, we empirically calibrate the cost of capital and operational efficiency under different financing structures, considering CO<sub>2</sub> transport via pipelines, barges, trains, and ships in a levelized transport cost model. Our results show that the choice of financing structure can result in transport cost differences of up to 26% for pipelines, with smaller effects observed for the other transport modes. Generally, public finance emerges as the most cost-effective financing structure for all CO<sub>2</sub> transport modes; the advantages of a lower cost of capital compared to private finance options outweigh the associated operational efficiency disadvantages. While additional aspects beyond cost must be considered when selecting financing structures for new infrastructure assets, our ex-ante analysis underlines the importance of financing structures for the economic viability of CO<sub>2</sub> transport assets, and for CCS more broadly.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 108253"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325000763","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The economic operation of carbon capture and storage (CCS) facilities hinges on the availability of CO2 transport infrastructure, and the financing structure of new transport assets will affect CO2 transport cost. Building on economic studies of infrastructure finance in other sectors, we empirically calibrate the cost of capital and operational efficiency under different financing structures, considering CO2 transport via pipelines, barges, trains, and ships in a levelized transport cost model. Our results show that the choice of financing structure can result in transport cost differences of up to 26% for pipelines, with smaller effects observed for the other transport modes. Generally, public finance emerges as the most cost-effective financing structure for all CO2 transport modes; the advantages of a lower cost of capital compared to private finance options outweigh the associated operational efficiency disadvantages. While additional aspects beyond cost must be considered when selecting financing structures for new infrastructure assets, our ex-ante analysis underlines the importance of financing structures for the economic viability of CO2 transport assets, and for CCS more broadly.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.