Ambitious energy density requirements hinder progress: Unintended effects of new energy vehicle subsidies on battery

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108335
Zhou Chen , Zhao Chen
{"title":"Ambitious energy density requirements hinder progress: Unintended effects of new energy vehicle subsidies on battery","authors":"Zhou Chen ,&nbsp;Zhao Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Financial incentives aimed at enhancing technical metrics are commonly used to promote technological advancement. A primer example is the new energy vehicle (NEV) subsidies in China’s car market, which are based on battery density. This study, however, reveals a significant correlation between increased energy density requirements for batteries under China’s NEV subsidy and an increase in reported battery failures. In striving to meet such requirements, manufacturers prioritize technical metrics over battery safety. We find that for vehicles released after the government started giving subsidies based on battery density, the extent to which battery failure cases are higher compared with other types of failure is more than twice the difference seen in vehicles that came out before the subsidy policy. Furthermore, we observe a relative increase of 13.3% in the likelihood of battery failure for models that barely meet the density requirements. This effect is particularly pronounced for firms with weaker technological capabilities and higher complaint rates. These findings emphasize the need for policymakers to carefully assess the potential unintended consequences of attribute-based subsidies. While the aim is to enhance specific technological indicators, it is necessary to consider the broader effects on nontargeted attributes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 108335"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325001598","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Financial incentives aimed at enhancing technical metrics are commonly used to promote technological advancement. A primer example is the new energy vehicle (NEV) subsidies in China’s car market, which are based on battery density. This study, however, reveals a significant correlation between increased energy density requirements for batteries under China’s NEV subsidy and an increase in reported battery failures. In striving to meet such requirements, manufacturers prioritize technical metrics over battery safety. We find that for vehicles released after the government started giving subsidies based on battery density, the extent to which battery failure cases are higher compared with other types of failure is more than twice the difference seen in vehicles that came out before the subsidy policy. Furthermore, we observe a relative increase of 13.3% in the likelihood of battery failure for models that barely meet the density requirements. This effect is particularly pronounced for firms with weaker technological capabilities and higher complaint rates. These findings emphasize the need for policymakers to carefully assess the potential unintended consequences of attribute-based subsidies. While the aim is to enhance specific technological indicators, it is necessary to consider the broader effects on nontargeted attributes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雄心勃勃的能量密度要求阻碍进展:新能源汽车补贴对电池的意外影响
旨在提高技术指标的财政激励通常用于促进技术进步。一个基本的例子是中国汽车市场上的新能源汽车(NEV)补贴,这是基于电池密度的。然而,这项研究揭示了中国新能源汽车补贴下电池能量密度要求的提高与报告的电池故障增加之间的显著相关性。在努力满足这些要求的过程中,制造商将技术指标置于电池安全之上。我们发现,对于政府开始根据电池密度进行补贴后发布的车辆,电池故障案例比其他类型故障高的程度是补贴政策之前发布的车辆差异的两倍以上。此外,我们观察到,对于勉强满足密度要求的模型,电池故障的可能性相对增加了13.3%。这种影响对于技术能力较弱、投诉率较高的公司尤为明显。这些发现强调了政策制定者需要仔细评估基于属性的补贴的潜在意外后果。虽然目标是提高具体的技术指标,但有必要考虑对非目标属性的更广泛影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Power hungry: How AI will drive energy demand Gone with the wind: Renewable energy projects and population change Street green space and electricity demand: Evidence from metered consumption data Corrigendum to “Is flexible plug-in electric vehicle charging an attractive investment? Evidence from implicit discount rate estimation” [Energy Economics 154 (2026) 109134]. The price of going green: Multi-objective optimization in the energy equity space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1