Elisa Ambrosi , Elisabetta Mezzalira , Federica Canzan , Chiara Leardini , Giovanni Vita , Giulia Marini , Jessica Longhini
{"title":"Effectiveness of digital health interventions for chronic conditions management in European primary care settings: Systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Elisa Ambrosi , Elisabetta Mezzalira , Federica Canzan , Chiara Leardini , Giovanni Vita , Giulia Marini , Jessica Longhini","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The past decade has seen rapid digitalization of healthcare, significantly transforming healthcare delivery. However, the impact of these technologies remains unclear, with notable gaps in evidence regarding their effectiveness, especially in primary care settings.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review assesses the effectiveness of digital health interventions versus interventions without digital components implemented over the last 10 years in European primary care settings for managing chronic diseases.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following Cochrane guidelines, we conducted a systematic review with <em>meta</em>-analysis. We searched multiple databases for randomized controlled trials. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies on digital health interventions for chronic disease management in primary care settings in Europe, evaluating outcomes such as hospitalizations, quality of life, and clinical measures. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently conducted by two authors, with discrepancies resolved by a third author. The certainty of the evidence was judged according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 9829 records, 23 studies were included, with most studies conducted in the UK and Spain. The most investigated conditions were type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Interventions mainly focused on patient monitoring, self-care education, and digital communication tools. The risk of bias was low to moderate for most studies. Meta-analyses showed no significant differences between digital health interventions and usual care for hospitalizations, depressive symptoms, anxiety, HbA1c, diastolic blood pressure, weight, or quality of life, except for a small improvement in systolic blood pressure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Digital health interventions have not yet demonstrated substantial benefits over traditional care for chronic disease management in European primary care. While some improvements were noted, particularly in systolic blood pressure, the impact remains limited. Further research is needed to enhance the effectiveness of digital health interventions, address current methodological limitations, and explore tailored approaches for both specific patient populations and multimorbid populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 105820"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505625000371","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The past decade has seen rapid digitalization of healthcare, significantly transforming healthcare delivery. However, the impact of these technologies remains unclear, with notable gaps in evidence regarding their effectiveness, especially in primary care settings.
Objective
This systematic review assesses the effectiveness of digital health interventions versus interventions without digital components implemented over the last 10 years in European primary care settings for managing chronic diseases.
Methods
Following Cochrane guidelines, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis. We searched multiple databases for randomized controlled trials. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies on digital health interventions for chronic disease management in primary care settings in Europe, evaluating outcomes such as hospitalizations, quality of life, and clinical measures. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently conducted by two authors, with discrepancies resolved by a third author. The certainty of the evidence was judged according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.
Results
From 9829 records, 23 studies were included, with most studies conducted in the UK and Spain. The most investigated conditions were type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Interventions mainly focused on patient monitoring, self-care education, and digital communication tools. The risk of bias was low to moderate for most studies. Meta-analyses showed no significant differences between digital health interventions and usual care for hospitalizations, depressive symptoms, anxiety, HbA1c, diastolic blood pressure, weight, or quality of life, except for a small improvement in systolic blood pressure.
Conclusion
Digital health interventions have not yet demonstrated substantial benefits over traditional care for chronic disease management in European primary care. While some improvements were noted, particularly in systolic blood pressure, the impact remains limited. Further research is needed to enhance the effectiveness of digital health interventions, address current methodological limitations, and explore tailored approaches for both specific patient populations and multimorbid populations.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings.
The scope of journal covers:
Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.;
Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc.
Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general;
Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.