Chemotaxonomy according to leaf terpenes of eight cypress species growing in the Czech Republic in the light of modern phylogenetic classification

IF 2 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Biochemical Systematics and Ecology Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.bse.2025.104980
Alexandra Malhocká, Martina Švábová, Tomáš Suchý
{"title":"Chemotaxonomy according to leaf terpenes of eight cypress species growing in the Czech Republic in the light of modern phylogenetic classification","authors":"Alexandra Malhocká,&nbsp;Martina Švábová,&nbsp;Tomáš Suchý","doi":"10.1016/j.bse.2025.104980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There have been many attempts to create a systematic arrangement of gymnosperms confirming the phylogenetic relationships among extant plants. Chemical data obtained by analysing leaf terpenes by gas chromatography have been used to study the chemotaxonomic characters of cypress species in an attempt to support modern phylogenetic classification. While the dominant terpenes proved to be reliable distinguishing features at the individual level of species, the relative proportions of individual terpene fractions were a significant feature distinguishing individual cypress genera. The <em>Juniperus</em> and <em>Sabina</em> genera were characterized by the highest content of monoterpenes (<em>Sabina virginiana</em> up to 95%). Genus <em>Juniperus</em> also contained higher amounts of sesquiterpenes (e.g. hedycaryol) and diterpenes (e.g. totarol), but genus <em>Sabina</em> showed a negligible content of these terpene fractions. Genus <em>Xanthocyparis</em> showed the highest content of diterpenes (up to 59%) of all species studied here, but a lower content of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes. Genus <em>Chamaecyparis</em> was characterized by balanced amounts of mono- and sesquiterpenes and also by a higher content of diterpenes (e.g. beyerene, totarol). Although genus <em>Taxodium</em> is from the Taxodioideae subfamily, it showed a terpene fractions content very similar to that of genus <em>Juniperus</em> from the subfamily Cupressoideae. Chemical data proved to be a reliable biomarker corresponding to the phylogenetic classification of conifers. No significant effect of seasonality on leaf terpenes production was proved in a study over a period of 6 years, with exception of the <em>Sabina pfitzeriana</em> and <em>Chamaecyparis lawsoniana</em> species. Slight differences were revealed among individual seasons.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8799,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 104980"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197825000298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There have been many attempts to create a systematic arrangement of gymnosperms confirming the phylogenetic relationships among extant plants. Chemical data obtained by analysing leaf terpenes by gas chromatography have been used to study the chemotaxonomic characters of cypress species in an attempt to support modern phylogenetic classification. While the dominant terpenes proved to be reliable distinguishing features at the individual level of species, the relative proportions of individual terpene fractions were a significant feature distinguishing individual cypress genera. The Juniperus and Sabina genera were characterized by the highest content of monoterpenes (Sabina virginiana up to 95%). Genus Juniperus also contained higher amounts of sesquiterpenes (e.g. hedycaryol) and diterpenes (e.g. totarol), but genus Sabina showed a negligible content of these terpene fractions. Genus Xanthocyparis showed the highest content of diterpenes (up to 59%) of all species studied here, but a lower content of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes. Genus Chamaecyparis was characterized by balanced amounts of mono- and sesquiterpenes and also by a higher content of diterpenes (e.g. beyerene, totarol). Although genus Taxodium is from the Taxodioideae subfamily, it showed a terpene fractions content very similar to that of genus Juniperus from the subfamily Cupressoideae. Chemical data proved to be a reliable biomarker corresponding to the phylogenetic classification of conifers. No significant effect of seasonality on leaf terpenes production was proved in a study over a period of 6 years, with exception of the Sabina pfitzeriana and Chamaecyparis lawsoniana species. Slight differences were revealed among individual seasons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于现代系统发育分类的捷克8种柏树叶萜类化学分类
人们曾多次尝试建立裸子植物的系统排列,以确认现存植物之间的系统发育关系。用气相色谱法分析叶萜类化合物所获得的化学数据已被用于研究柏树种的化学分类特征,试图支持现代系统发育分类。虽然优势萜烯被证明是物种个体水平上可靠的区分特征,但单个萜烯组分的相对比例是区分单个柏树属的重要特征。单萜烯含量最高的树种为杜松属和沙宾属(Sabina virginia),达95%。杜松属还含有较高的倍半萜(如丁香醇)和二萜(如桃红醇),但Sabina属的这些萜组分的含量可以忽略不计。黄盖菇属的二萜含量最高(达59%),单萜和倍半萜含量较低。Chamaecyparis属的特点是单萜类和倍半萜类含量平衡,而且二萜类(如beyerene, totarol)含量较高。虽然Taxodium属属于Taxodioideae亚科,但其萜烯含量与柏科Juniperus属非常相似。化学数据被证明是一个可靠的生物标志物,对应于针叶树的系统发育分类。在一项为期6年的研究中,除了Sabina pfitzeriana和Chamaecyparis lawsoniana外,季节性对叶片萜烯产量没有显著影响。各个季节之间略有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology). In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.
期刊最新文献
Chemophenetic characterization of Pleuropterus multiflorus and Pleuropterus angulatus based on UPLC-MS/MS and molecular networking Phytochemical constituents of the branches and leaves of Callicarpa pedunculata R. Br. and their taxonomic distribution Sesquiterpenoids from the twigs and leaves of Michelia foveolata Merr. ex Dandy and their chemotaxonomic significance Phytochemical content, antioxidant, antifungal, and insecticidal potentials of Withania adpressa Coss. ex Batt. for eco-friendly control of stored products Seasonal metabolomic profiling of Eucalyptus tereticornis using 1H-NMR spectroscopy: Insights into volatile dynamics and neuroprotective potential of three eucalyptus species
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1