Optimal timing of organs-at-risk-sparing adaptive radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer under re-planning resource constraints

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.phro.2025.100715
Fatemeh Nosrat , Cem Dede , Lucas B. McCullum , Raul Garcia , Abdallah S.R. Mohamed , Jacob G. Scott , James E. Bates , Brigid A. McDonald , Kareem A. Wahid , Mohamed A. Naser , Renjie He , Aysenur Karagoz , Amy C. Moreno , Lisanne V. van Dijk , Kristy K. Brock , Jolien Heukelom , Seyedmohammadhossein Hosseinian , Mehdi Hemmati , Andrew J. Schaefer , Clifton D. Fuller
{"title":"Optimal timing of organs-at-risk-sparing adaptive radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer under re-planning resource constraints","authors":"Fatemeh Nosrat ,&nbsp;Cem Dede ,&nbsp;Lucas B. McCullum ,&nbsp;Raul Garcia ,&nbsp;Abdallah S.R. Mohamed ,&nbsp;Jacob G. Scott ,&nbsp;James E. Bates ,&nbsp;Brigid A. McDonald ,&nbsp;Kareem A. Wahid ,&nbsp;Mohamed A. Naser ,&nbsp;Renjie He ,&nbsp;Aysenur Karagoz ,&nbsp;Amy C. Moreno ,&nbsp;Lisanne V. van Dijk ,&nbsp;Kristy K. Brock ,&nbsp;Jolien Heukelom ,&nbsp;Seyedmohammadhossein Hosseinian ,&nbsp;Mehdi Hemmati ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Schaefer ,&nbsp;Clifton D. Fuller","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2025.100715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Prior work on adaptive organ-at-risk (OAR)-sparing radiation therapy has typically reported outcomes based on fixed-number or fixed-interval re-planning, which represent one-size-fits-all approaches and do not account for the variable progression of individual patients’ toxicities. The purpose of this study was to determine the personalized optimal timing of re-planning in adaptive OAR-sparing radiation therapy, considering limited re-planning resources, for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A novel Markov decision process (MDP) model was developed to determine optimal timing of re-planning based on the patient’s expected toxicity, characterized by normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), for four toxicities. The MDP parameters were derived from a dataset comprising 52 HNC patients treated between 2007 and 2013. Kernel density estimation was used to smooth the sample distributions. Optimal re-planning strategies were obtained when the permissible number of re-plans throughout the treatment was limited to 1, 2, and 3, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The MDP (optimal) solution recommended re-planning when the difference between planned and actual NTCPs (ΔNTCP) was greater than or equal to 1%, 2%, 2%, and 4% at treatment fractions 10, 15, 20, and 25, respectively, exhibiting a temporally increasing pattern. The ΔNTCP thresholds remained constant across the number of re-planning allowances (1, 2, and 3).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In limited-resource settings that impeded high-frequency adaptations, ΔNTCP thresholds obtained from an MDP model could derive optimal timing of re-planning to minimize the likelihood of treatment toxicities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100715"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563162500020X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Prior work on adaptive organ-at-risk (OAR)-sparing radiation therapy has typically reported outcomes based on fixed-number or fixed-interval re-planning, which represent one-size-fits-all approaches and do not account for the variable progression of individual patients’ toxicities. The purpose of this study was to determine the personalized optimal timing of re-planning in adaptive OAR-sparing radiation therapy, considering limited re-planning resources, for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).

Materials and methods

A novel Markov decision process (MDP) model was developed to determine optimal timing of re-planning based on the patient’s expected toxicity, characterized by normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), for four toxicities. The MDP parameters were derived from a dataset comprising 52 HNC patients treated between 2007 and 2013. Kernel density estimation was used to smooth the sample distributions. Optimal re-planning strategies were obtained when the permissible number of re-plans throughout the treatment was limited to 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

Results

The MDP (optimal) solution recommended re-planning when the difference between planned and actual NTCPs (ΔNTCP) was greater than or equal to 1%, 2%, 2%, and 4% at treatment fractions 10, 15, 20, and 25, respectively, exhibiting a temporally increasing pattern. The ΔNTCP thresholds remained constant across the number of re-planning allowances (1, 2, and 3).

Conclusion

In limited-resource settings that impeded high-frequency adaptations, ΔNTCP thresholds obtained from an MDP model could derive optimal timing of re-planning to minimize the likelihood of treatment toxicities.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新规划资源约束下保留高危器官的头颈癌适应性放射治疗的最佳时机
背景和目的先前关于适应性器官风险(OAR)保留放射治疗的研究通常报告的结果是基于固定数量或固定间隔的重新规划,这代表了一刀切的方法,并没有考虑到个体患者毒性的可变进展。本研究的目的是考虑到头颈癌(HNC)患者有限的重新规划资源,确定适应性保留卵巢放射治疗重新规划的个性化最佳时机。材料和方法建立了一种新的马尔可夫决策过程(MDP)模型,用于根据患者的预期毒性(以正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)为特征)确定四种毒性的最佳重新计划时机。MDP参数来自2007年至2013年期间接受治疗的52例HNC患者的数据集。采用核密度估计平滑样本分布。当整个治疗过程中允许的重新规划次数分别限制在1次、2次和3次时,获得了最优的重新规划策略。结果当计划与实际nntcp (ΔNTCP)在处理分数10、15、20和25分别大于或等于1%、2%、2%和4%时,MDP(最优)溶液建议重新规划。ΔNTCP阈值在重新计划允许数(1、2和3)中保持不变。结论在资源有限的环境中,阻碍高频适应,从MDP模型中获得的ΔNTCP阈值可以得出重新计划的最佳时机,以最大限度地减少治疗毒性的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reduced beam time and distal linear energy transfer with mini-ridge filters in pencil beam scanning proton therapy Comparative analysis of artificial intelligence-based contouring of cardiac substructures on computed tomography scans for radiation therapy A meta-analysis of dose-volume parameters and treatment efficiency comparing O-ring and C-arm accelerator systems for craniospinal irradiations An efficient automated approach for accumulated dose estimation in prostate cancer radiotherapy Reduction of organ of interest dose in proton therapy for oesophageal cancer through optimized setup robustness settings and online adaptation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1