{"title":"The contribution of ICTs and telemedicine to COVID-19 vaccination: Evidence from the United States","authors":"M.Eugenia Fabra , Juan Jung , Raúl Katz","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2025.100980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This paper explores the influence of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and telemedicine on COVID-19 vaccination decisions in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Leveraging survey data from nearly 4,000 respondents collected in 2021, we apply Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to analyze how factors such as vulnerability (measured as health status), ICT access and satisfaction with prior telemedicine experiences contribute to trust in telemedicine. This trust, in turn, shapes attitudes toward vaccination and ultimately influences vaccination decisions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our results show that greater access to ICT enhances trust in telemedicine, leading to more positive attitudes towards vaccination and higher vaccination rates. However, these positive effects are not uniform across all population groups. Higher-income, older, and more educated individuals benefit significantly from telemedicine, while lower-income, younger, and less educated populations face barriers such as limited ICT access, economic constraints, and lower digital literacy, reducing the impact of telemedicine on their vaccination decisions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The novelty of this study lies in its focus on the digital divide in healthcare, a relatively underexplored factor in vaccine hesitancy research. We provide new empirical evidence on the role of ICT and telemedicine in shaping health behaviors during a pandemic, emphasizing the need for targeted policies to address inequalities in digital access and healthcare. Policy interventions should aim to improve ICT infrastructure, promote digital literacy, and build trust in telemedicine, especially among disadvantaged groups, to ensure more equitable healthcare outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"14 2","pages":"Article 100980"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883725000085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
This paper explores the influence of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and telemedicine on COVID-19 vaccination decisions in the United States.
Method
Leveraging survey data from nearly 4,000 respondents collected in 2021, we apply Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to analyze how factors such as vulnerability (measured as health status), ICT access and satisfaction with prior telemedicine experiences contribute to trust in telemedicine. This trust, in turn, shapes attitudes toward vaccination and ultimately influences vaccination decisions.
Results
Our results show that greater access to ICT enhances trust in telemedicine, leading to more positive attitudes towards vaccination and higher vaccination rates. However, these positive effects are not uniform across all population groups. Higher-income, older, and more educated individuals benefit significantly from telemedicine, while lower-income, younger, and less educated populations face barriers such as limited ICT access, economic constraints, and lower digital literacy, reducing the impact of telemedicine on their vaccination decisions.
Conclusions
The novelty of this study lies in its focus on the digital divide in healthcare, a relatively underexplored factor in vaccine hesitancy research. We provide new empirical evidence on the role of ICT and telemedicine in shaping health behaviors during a pandemic, emphasizing the need for targeted policies to address inequalities in digital access and healthcare. Policy interventions should aim to improve ICT infrastructure, promote digital literacy, and build trust in telemedicine, especially among disadvantaged groups, to ensure more equitable healthcare outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments.
HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology.
Topics covered by HPT will include:
- Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems
- Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches
- National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives
- Cross-border eHealth including health tourism
- The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare
- Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies
- Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies
- Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making
- Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in)
- Regulation and health economics