Understanding key factors affecting underground logistics systems adoption and front-end planning: A cross-sectoral investigation and insights into emerging mobility solutions

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.002
Wanjie Hu , Jianjun Dong , Kai Yang , Zhilong Chen
{"title":"Understanding key factors affecting underground logistics systems adoption and front-end planning: A cross-sectoral investigation and insights into emerging mobility solutions","authors":"Wanjie Hu ,&nbsp;Jianjun Dong ,&nbsp;Kai Yang ,&nbsp;Zhilong Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent progress in the underground logistics systems (ULS) heralds a move closer to the prospect of low-carbon automated freight movement utilizing electrified tunnels and pneumatic pipeline technologies. However, amidst the array of novel concepts, the industry's understanding of the enablers and barriers of ULS remains incomplete. This paper introduced an analytic framework for both public and private sectors to revisit the ULS plans in a nascent stage. Through a comprehensive document review, we delineate the typical approaches to initiate ULS from the perspectives of government and consortia. Fifty-four factors characterizing the sponsors' visions, project startup prerequisites, and implementation barriers were identified. We conducted semi-structured interviews and a two-round Delphi survey with 18 experts to elucidate how these factors influence ULS adoption and explore causal relationships in new system front-end planning. Subsequently, a grounded-theory framework was constructed to interrelate multi-thematic concepts. Our research findings indicate several key points: (i) the gestation of ULS project is a collaborative effort between public and private sectors looking for shared visions and common interests; (ii) the unilateral promotion of emerging transport systems/modes could face diverse barriers and disadvantages due to the complexity, uncertainties, and lack of precedents; (iii) positioning ULS programs within a public-private partnership agreement fostered by incentive policies is crucial to achieving social, technological, and business preparedness for transformation. This paper contributes to the understanding of cross-sectoral conception and arrangements of logistics modal shift from road to underground with sustainable development goals. It also offers novel insights for freight transport system adoption and policy-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"164 ","pages":"Pages 160-177"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25000599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent progress in the underground logistics systems (ULS) heralds a move closer to the prospect of low-carbon automated freight movement utilizing electrified tunnels and pneumatic pipeline technologies. However, amidst the array of novel concepts, the industry's understanding of the enablers and barriers of ULS remains incomplete. This paper introduced an analytic framework for both public and private sectors to revisit the ULS plans in a nascent stage. Through a comprehensive document review, we delineate the typical approaches to initiate ULS from the perspectives of government and consortia. Fifty-four factors characterizing the sponsors' visions, project startup prerequisites, and implementation barriers were identified. We conducted semi-structured interviews and a two-round Delphi survey with 18 experts to elucidate how these factors influence ULS adoption and explore causal relationships in new system front-end planning. Subsequently, a grounded-theory framework was constructed to interrelate multi-thematic concepts. Our research findings indicate several key points: (i) the gestation of ULS project is a collaborative effort between public and private sectors looking for shared visions and common interests; (ii) the unilateral promotion of emerging transport systems/modes could face diverse barriers and disadvantages due to the complexity, uncertainties, and lack of precedents; (iii) positioning ULS programs within a public-private partnership agreement fostered by incentive policies is crucial to achieving social, technological, and business preparedness for transformation. This paper contributes to the understanding of cross-sectoral conception and arrangements of logistics modal shift from road to underground with sustainable development goals. It also offers novel insights for freight transport system adoption and policy-making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解影响地下物流系统采用和前端规划的关键因素:对新兴移动解决方案的跨部门调查和见解
地下物流系统(ULS)的最新进展预示着利用电气化隧道和气动管道技术实现低碳自动化货运的前景更加接近。然而,在一系列新颖的概念中,业界对ULS的推动因素和障碍的理解仍然不完整。本文介绍了一个分析框架,供公共和私营部门在初始阶段重新审视ULS计划。通过全面的文献回顾,我们从政府和财团的角度描述了启动ULS的典型方法。确定了表征发起人愿景、项目启动先决条件和实施障碍的54个因素。我们对18位专家进行了半结构化访谈和两轮德尔菲调查,以阐明这些因素如何影响ULS的采用,并探讨新系统前端规划中的因果关系。在此基础上,构建了多主题概念相互关联的理论框架。我们的研究结果显示了以下几点要点:(i) ULS项目的孕育是公私营机构寻求共同愿景和共同利益的合作;(ii)由于复杂性、不确定性和缺乏先例,单方面推广新兴运输系统/模式可能面临各种障碍和不利因素;(iii)将ULS项目定位在由激励政策推动的公私合作协议中,对于实现转型的社会、技术和商业准备至关重要。本文有助于理解以可持续发展为目标的公路向地下物流模式转变的跨部门概念和安排。它还为货运系统的采用和决策提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
Delivering accessible school transportation services in Canada's Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area: A study of education professionals' perspectives Differences in future car-purchase intentions between undergraduates from car-owning households and non-car households Rethinking corporate mobility management: Enhancing employee loyalty through corporate mobility and transportation offerings Port group integration and regional high-quality economic development: Mechanisms and spatial effects Rethinking cost–benefit analysis for transformative cycling policies: Integrating behavioral change and the logsum method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1