Jiawang Zhang , Ming Wang , Kai Liu , Zhan’ao Zhao
{"title":"Dynamic changes in soil erosion and challenges to grain productivity in the black soil region of Northeast China","authors":"Jiawang Zhang , Ming Wang , Kai Liu , Zhan’ao Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil erosion presents a significant obstacle to food and ecosystem security. This study combined multi-source data to construct a soil erosion model and challenges to grain productivity in the black soil region of Northeast China. By calculating water and wind erosion modulus between 1991 and 2020, we investigated the temporal trend, spatial aggregation, and driving and interacting factors in subregion. Soil water erosion exhibited distribution pattern of middle low and side high, with erosion average modulus was reached at 280.08 t. hm<sup>−2</sup>. a<sup>-1</sup>, and higher rates observed in summer. Precipitation and vegetation cover were combined significantly enhancement factor of 0.44. Wind erosion was concentrated in the western of Liao River Plain, the average erosion modulus is 0.81 t. hm<sup>−2</sup>. a<sup>-1</sup>. Wind erosion was relatively stable throughout the year, with two-factor enhancement factor of 0.76 attributed to soil organic matter and clay content. The expansion of cities over the last 30 years has resulted in the encroachment of 7,936 km<sup>2</sup> of cropland. The average thickness of soil complex erosion reached 48.48 mm/a, affecting 25.23 million hectares and 1.90 million tons grain yield. Soil erosion and grain yield deterioration areas were mainly distributed in sloping cropland regions. Nearly 20,000 km<sup>2</sup> of cropland faces the threat of soil erosion and disrupted land productivity. There is an imbalance between the land productivity and grain yield, and the proportion of severely disrupted productivity reached 27 %. Soil erosion hotspots, stabilization areas and potential hotspots in each subregion were identified, and recommendations were formulated from a subregional perspective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 113145"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25000743","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Soil erosion presents a significant obstacle to food and ecosystem security. This study combined multi-source data to construct a soil erosion model and challenges to grain productivity in the black soil region of Northeast China. By calculating water and wind erosion modulus between 1991 and 2020, we investigated the temporal trend, spatial aggregation, and driving and interacting factors in subregion. Soil water erosion exhibited distribution pattern of middle low and side high, with erosion average modulus was reached at 280.08 t. hm−2. a-1, and higher rates observed in summer. Precipitation and vegetation cover were combined significantly enhancement factor of 0.44. Wind erosion was concentrated in the western of Liao River Plain, the average erosion modulus is 0.81 t. hm−2. a-1. Wind erosion was relatively stable throughout the year, with two-factor enhancement factor of 0.76 attributed to soil organic matter and clay content. The expansion of cities over the last 30 years has resulted in the encroachment of 7,936 km2 of cropland. The average thickness of soil complex erosion reached 48.48 mm/a, affecting 25.23 million hectares and 1.90 million tons grain yield. Soil erosion and grain yield deterioration areas were mainly distributed in sloping cropland regions. Nearly 20,000 km2 of cropland faces the threat of soil erosion and disrupted land productivity. There is an imbalance between the land productivity and grain yield, and the proportion of severely disrupted productivity reached 27 %. Soil erosion hotspots, stabilization areas and potential hotspots in each subregion were identified, and recommendations were formulated from a subregional perspective.
土壤侵蚀是粮食和生态系统安全的重大障碍。本研究结合多源数据,构建了东北黑土区土壤侵蚀模型及粮食生产面临的挑战。通过对1991—2020年水蚀和风蚀模数的计算,分析了各分区域水蚀和风蚀模数的时空变化趋势、空间聚集特征、驱动因素和相互作用因素。土壤水分侵蚀呈现中低偏高的分布格局,侵蚀平均模数为280.08 t. hm−2。A-1,夏季发病率较高。降水量与植被盖度组合显著增强因子为0.44。风蚀主要集中在辽河平原西部,平均风蚀模数为0.81 t. hm−2。一流的。风蚀全年相对稳定,土壤有机质和粘土含量的双因子增强因子为0.76。在过去的30年里,城市的扩张已经侵占了7936平方公里的耕地。土壤复合侵蚀平均厚度达48.48 mm/a,影响粮食产量2523万公顷、190万吨。土壤侵蚀和粮食产量恶化区主要分布在坡耕地区。近2万平方公里的农田面临水土流失和土地生产力中断的威胁。土地生产力与粮食产量不平衡,严重破坏的比例达到27%。确定了各分区域的土壤侵蚀热点、稳定区和潜在热点,并从分区域角度提出了建议。
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.