Unintended consequence of high bid price exclusion in IPO auctions: Evidence from China

IF 2.1 2区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Financial Markets Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1016/j.finmar.2024.100936
Di Wu , Xiaoke Cheng , Kam C. Chan , Shenghao Gao
{"title":"Unintended consequence of high bid price exclusion in IPO auctions: Evidence from China","authors":"Di Wu ,&nbsp;Xiaoke Cheng ,&nbsp;Kam C. Chan ,&nbsp;Shenghao Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.finmar.2024.100936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using a reform to relax the exclusion rate of highest bids in the book-building process as an exogenous shock, we find that IPO underpricing decreases, which indicates that excluding a certain percentage of the highest bids impairs IPO pricing efficiency. Further tests reveal that relaxing the mandate increases investors’ valuation of an IPO, thereby decreasing IPO underpricing. Our results also suggest that the relaxation of the stipulation motivates investors to provide more information, as revealed by fewer anchoring bids and reduced herding behavior, as well as higher opinion divergence and better predictive power for investor bids on post-IPO prices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Markets","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 100936"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386418124000545","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using a reform to relax the exclusion rate of highest bids in the book-building process as an exogenous shock, we find that IPO underpricing decreases, which indicates that excluding a certain percentage of the highest bids impairs IPO pricing efficiency. Further tests reveal that relaxing the mandate increases investors’ valuation of an IPO, thereby decreasing IPO underpricing. Our results also suggest that the relaxation of the stipulation motivates investors to provide more information, as revealed by fewer anchoring bids and reduced herding behavior, as well as higher opinion divergence and better predictive power for investor bids on post-IPO prices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IPO拍卖中高价排除的意外后果:来自中国的证据
通过放宽最高竞价排除率的改革作为外生冲击,我们发现IPO抑价现象有所减少,这表明排除一定比例的最高竞价会损害IPO定价效率。进一步的测试表明,放宽授权增加了投资者对IPO的估值,从而减少了IPO的低定价。我们的研究结果还表明,放宽规定激励投资者提供更多信息,这表现为锚定出价减少和羊群行为减少,以及投资者对ipo后价格出价的意见分歧和预测能力增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Financial Markets
Journal of Financial Markets BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Markets publishes high quality original research on applied and theoretical issues related to securities trading and pricing. Area of coverage includes the analysis and design of trading mechanisms, optimal order placement strategies, the role of information in securities markets, financial intermediation as it relates to securities investments - for example, the structure of brokerage and mutual fund industries, and analyses of short and long run horizon price behaviour. The journal strives to maintain a balance between theoretical and empirical work, and aims to provide prompt and constructive reviews to paper submitters.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Dealer competition in over-the-counter markets The Chinese trading halt puzzle Does familiarity breed activism? Geography and hedge fund activism Extreme fund performance and investor divergence in beliefs about manager skill
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1