Subjective probabilities under behavioral heuristics

IF 5.6 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Economics & Finance Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.iref.2025.103899
Oriana Rahman , Andrei Semenov
{"title":"Subjective probabilities under behavioral heuristics","authors":"Oriana Rahman ,&nbsp;Andrei Semenov","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2025.103899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We develop an approach to forming the subjective probabilities of future stock returns in the presence of multiple behavioral heuristics. This approach relaxes the assumption that behavioral heuristics are independent and makes it possible to investigate the individual effects as well as the joint effect of different behavioral heuristics on the investor’s probability assessment. In contrast to the objective probabilities, these subjective probabilities reflect the investor’s attitudes towards anticipated changes in the market conditions. They coincide with the objective probabilities when the investor is rational. To illustrate the use of this approach, we explore the implications of anchoring, overconfidence/doubt, and the availability heuristic for the predictability of individual stock returns based on past return data. We find empirically that the existing evidence against the random walk hypothesis may stem from the fact that the objective probabilities of large stock returns of either sign overstate the probabilities that the investor assigns to these returns given the market conditions that are anticipated to occur in the next period, which generates the “peso problem” in the data. Allowing for overconfidence in the subjective distribution of stock returns (induced by the anticipated decrease in the return volatility or the inability of the investor to adequately adjust the limits of the confidence interval away from the anchoring value) substantially decreases (compared with the case of the investor’s rationality) the degree, to which individual stock returns are predictable based on their past history, and, therefore, helps solve the stock return predictability puzzle.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 103899"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025000620","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We develop an approach to forming the subjective probabilities of future stock returns in the presence of multiple behavioral heuristics. This approach relaxes the assumption that behavioral heuristics are independent and makes it possible to investigate the individual effects as well as the joint effect of different behavioral heuristics on the investor’s probability assessment. In contrast to the objective probabilities, these subjective probabilities reflect the investor’s attitudes towards anticipated changes in the market conditions. They coincide with the objective probabilities when the investor is rational. To illustrate the use of this approach, we explore the implications of anchoring, overconfidence/doubt, and the availability heuristic for the predictability of individual stock returns based on past return data. We find empirically that the existing evidence against the random walk hypothesis may stem from the fact that the objective probabilities of large stock returns of either sign overstate the probabilities that the investor assigns to these returns given the market conditions that are anticipated to occur in the next period, which generates the “peso problem” in the data. Allowing for overconfidence in the subjective distribution of stock returns (induced by the anticipated decrease in the return volatility or the inability of the investor to adequately adjust the limits of the confidence interval away from the anchoring value) substantially decreases (compared with the case of the investor’s rationality) the degree, to which individual stock returns are predictable based on their past history, and, therefore, helps solve the stock return predictability puzzle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为启发式下的主观概率
我们开发了一种在多重行为启发下形成未来股票收益主观概率的方法。这种方法打破了行为启发式是独立的假设,使得研究不同行为启发式对投资者概率评估的个体效应和联合效应成为可能。与客观概率相反,这些主观概率反映了投资者对市场条件预期变化的态度。当投资者是理性的时候,它们与客观概率一致。为了说明这种方法的使用,我们探讨了锚定、过度自信/怀疑以及基于过去回报数据的个股回报可预测性的可用性启发式的含义。我们从经验上发现,反对随机漫步假设的现有证据可能源于这样一个事实,即任何一个标志的大股票回报的客观概率都夸大了投资者分配给这些回报的概率,给定下一时期预期发生的市场条件,这在数据中产生了“比索问题”。允许对股票收益主观分布的过度自信(由预期收益波动性下降或投资者无法充分调整偏离锚定值的置信区间的限制所引起)大大降低(与投资者理性的情况相比)基于其过去历史的个股收益可预测的程度,因此有助于解决股票收益可预测性难题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
253
期刊介绍: The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.
期刊最新文献
Unpacking the effects of rule of law on the marketplace lending: Evidence from China How social security expenditure and the digital economy shape regional economic resilience? Does the new energy transition in cities promote talent aggregation? Evidence from China's new energy demonstration city policy Connectedness between communication digital assets and communication stock markets: Implications for portfolio design and hedging performance Natural disasters, corporate ESG performance and firm value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1