Characterizing informality in urban resource management: Towards an integrated framework of urban metabolism and informal flows

IF 6 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Land Use Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107472
Yasmina Choueiri, Daniela Perrotti, Alejandra Acevedo-De-los-Ríos
{"title":"Characterizing informality in urban resource management: Towards an integrated framework of urban metabolism and informal flows","authors":"Yasmina Choueiri,&nbsp;Daniela Perrotti,&nbsp;Alejandra Acevedo-De-los-Ríos","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban resource management demands greater efficiency to address the growing challenge of resource use in cities. Urban Metabolism (UM) is a fundamental approach that quantifies energy, water, and material flows within urban environments, providing a foundation for policy development. However, UM often overlooks informal flows—unregulated resource processes that play a significant role in many regions, particularly in developing countries, operating outside the oversight of public institutions. This paper addresses two primary objectives. First, it offers a structured characterization and holistic definition of informality, analyzing its diverse forms across water, energy, waste management, food production, and mobility sectors. Second, it introduces an expanded UM framework that integrates informal flows. This approach has the potential to help policymakers with a comprehensive tool to address resource management challenges more inclusively by including these informal systems. Key findings highlight three significant policy implications: integrating informal and formal systems is complex, hence this requires flexible and adaptive regulatory frameworks; the exacerbation of social injustices through informal flows and inequalities—especially concerning access, affordability, and gender disparities—underscoring the need for targeted, equity-focused policies; and the human-centric nature of informal systems, emphasizing the importance of engaging informal actors in policy development and land-use planning. The expanded UM framework fosters the creation of transparent, equitable, and effective policies that, in theory, can bridge the gap between formal and informal systems, enhancing resource governance, social equity, and sustainable urban development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 107472"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725000055","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban resource management demands greater efficiency to address the growing challenge of resource use in cities. Urban Metabolism (UM) is a fundamental approach that quantifies energy, water, and material flows within urban environments, providing a foundation for policy development. However, UM often overlooks informal flows—unregulated resource processes that play a significant role in many regions, particularly in developing countries, operating outside the oversight of public institutions. This paper addresses two primary objectives. First, it offers a structured characterization and holistic definition of informality, analyzing its diverse forms across water, energy, waste management, food production, and mobility sectors. Second, it introduces an expanded UM framework that integrates informal flows. This approach has the potential to help policymakers with a comprehensive tool to address resource management challenges more inclusively by including these informal systems. Key findings highlight three significant policy implications: integrating informal and formal systems is complex, hence this requires flexible and adaptive regulatory frameworks; the exacerbation of social injustices through informal flows and inequalities—especially concerning access, affordability, and gender disparities—underscoring the need for targeted, equity-focused policies; and the human-centric nature of informal systems, emphasizing the importance of engaging informal actors in policy development and land-use planning. The expanded UM framework fosters the creation of transparent, equitable, and effective policies that, in theory, can bridge the gap between formal and informal systems, enhancing resource governance, social equity, and sustainable urban development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
期刊最新文献
An analysis of default rates and their causes in Brazil’s land credit program Designing social surveys for understanding farming and natural resource management: A purposeful review of best-practice survey methods Editorial Board The effect of freshwater regulation on farmland values in New Zealand – ‘Dairy farming in Selwyn Waihora, Canterbury’ Still suffering, still on the periphery? Different paths of the town's post-war spatial change. Evidence from north-eastern Poland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1