Francisco Cima;Pilar Pazos;Minjung Lee;Kristie Gutierrez;Jennifer Kidd;Orlando Ayala;Stacie Ringleb;Krishnanand Kaipa;Danielle Rhemer
{"title":"Developing Teamwork Skills in Undergraduate Engineering Students: A Comparison Between Disciplinary and Cross-Disciplinary Projects","authors":"Francisco Cima;Pilar Pazos;Minjung Lee;Kristie Gutierrez;Jennifer Kidd;Orlando Ayala;Stacie Ringleb;Krishnanand Kaipa;Danielle Rhemer","doi":"10.1109/TE.2024.3456098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study contributes to team science and competency development by comparing demonstrated teamwork skills by engineering students participating in disciplinary and cross-disciplinary team projects. Teamwork skills are key competencies necessary to solve complex technical challenges in the workplace. Despite prior efforts to enhance these competencies in engineering students, there is still a lack of empirical research examining the effectiveness of such efforts. This study compares teamwork skills demonstrated by undergraduate engineering students in two conditions: 1) engineering-only teams and 2) cross-disciplinary collaboration with education students. Projects in both settings had similar levels of complexity, scope, team size, and requirements. The differences in teamwork skills were investigated using a mixed methods approach with a main quantitative phase, followed by a secondary qualitative analysis to further examine the nature of the differences. Students in the cross-disciplinary model demonstrated higher levels of teamwork skills than those in the engineering-only condition. Results from this work illustrate how authentic and well-designed cross-disciplinary team projects can facilitate the development of students’ teamwork skills beyond what can be achieved in disciplinary teams, fulfilling an essential ABET requirement and enhancing student preparation to succeed in the workplace.","PeriodicalId":55011,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Education","volume":"68 1","pages":"86-94"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10681155/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study contributes to team science and competency development by comparing demonstrated teamwork skills by engineering students participating in disciplinary and cross-disciplinary team projects. Teamwork skills are key competencies necessary to solve complex technical challenges in the workplace. Despite prior efforts to enhance these competencies in engineering students, there is still a lack of empirical research examining the effectiveness of such efforts. This study compares teamwork skills demonstrated by undergraduate engineering students in two conditions: 1) engineering-only teams and 2) cross-disciplinary collaboration with education students. Projects in both settings had similar levels of complexity, scope, team size, and requirements. The differences in teamwork skills were investigated using a mixed methods approach with a main quantitative phase, followed by a secondary qualitative analysis to further examine the nature of the differences. Students in the cross-disciplinary model demonstrated higher levels of teamwork skills than those in the engineering-only condition. Results from this work illustrate how authentic and well-designed cross-disciplinary team projects can facilitate the development of students’ teamwork skills beyond what can be achieved in disciplinary teams, fulfilling an essential ABET requirement and enhancing student preparation to succeed in the workplace.
期刊介绍:
The IEEE Transactions on Education (ToE) publishes significant and original scholarly contributions to education in electrical and electronics engineering, computer engineering, computer science, and other fields within the scope of interest of IEEE. Contributions must address discovery, integration, and/or application of knowledge in education in these fields. Articles must support contributions and assertions with compelling evidence and provide explicit, transparent descriptions of the processes through which the evidence is collected, analyzed, and interpreted. While characteristics of compelling evidence cannot be described to address every conceivable situation, generally assessment of the work being reported must go beyond student self-report and attitudinal data.