Terrestrial wildlife shows limited response in spatiotemporal activity to logging

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70185
Seth Timothy Wong, Roshan Guharajan, Azrie Petrus, Jaffly Jubili, Johnny Kissing, Peter Lagan, Robert Ong, Andreas Wilting, Rahel Sollmann
{"title":"Terrestrial wildlife shows limited response in spatiotemporal activity to logging","authors":"Seth Timothy Wong,&nbsp;Roshan Guharajan,&nbsp;Azrie Petrus,&nbsp;Jaffly Jubili,&nbsp;Johnny Kissing,&nbsp;Peter Lagan,&nbsp;Robert Ong,&nbsp;Andreas Wilting,&nbsp;Rahel Sollmann","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While habitat loss and hunting remain the major drivers of biodiversity declines, sublethal disturbances, such as human presence, recreation, and noise also impact wildlife. In response, wildlife often adjust their spatiotemporal behaviors. This study assesses how terrestrial wildlife responds to sublethal disturbances associated with sustainable logging activities. Using camera traps, we conducted a 2-year continuous survey of two logging compartments within an active, sustainably logged forest reserve in central Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. The survey encompassed periods before, during, and after logging activities, and we obtained daily felling data. Using generalized linear mixed models, we assessed the impact of logging on the spatiotemporal activity of 10 terrestrial mammal and galliform species, considering spatial factors like logging intensity and distance from logging activity, and temporal factors such as days since logging. Four species had a significant and strong response to logging intensity, with varied directions of effect. Only for one species, the response to logging intensity was mediated by time since logging. Though only descriptive, we found no evidence of diel activity shifts, and, for all other species detected during our survey, general patterns in the number of records across each logging period were mixed. Our results highlight the variable and species-specific responses to logging activity. At a local scale, many species exhibit resilience in their spatiotemporal activity patterns, but for affected species, the effects of logging appear to linger over time. The overall limited response could be due to the relatively low disturbance nature of reduced-impact logging.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70185","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70185","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While habitat loss and hunting remain the major drivers of biodiversity declines, sublethal disturbances, such as human presence, recreation, and noise also impact wildlife. In response, wildlife often adjust their spatiotemporal behaviors. This study assesses how terrestrial wildlife responds to sublethal disturbances associated with sustainable logging activities. Using camera traps, we conducted a 2-year continuous survey of two logging compartments within an active, sustainably logged forest reserve in central Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. The survey encompassed periods before, during, and after logging activities, and we obtained daily felling data. Using generalized linear mixed models, we assessed the impact of logging on the spatiotemporal activity of 10 terrestrial mammal and galliform species, considering spatial factors like logging intensity and distance from logging activity, and temporal factors such as days since logging. Four species had a significant and strong response to logging intensity, with varied directions of effect. Only for one species, the response to logging intensity was mediated by time since logging. Though only descriptive, we found no evidence of diel activity shifts, and, for all other species detected during our survey, general patterns in the number of records across each logging period were mixed. Our results highlight the variable and species-specific responses to logging activity. At a local scale, many species exhibit resilience in their spatiotemporal activity patterns, but for affected species, the effects of logging appear to linger over time. The overall limited response could be due to the relatively low disturbance nature of reduced-impact logging.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
期刊最新文献
Pygoscelis penguins prefer different oceanographic and terrestrial habitats during the austral summer Associating cultivars or species with complementary traits is key for enhancing aphid control through bottom-up effects Preferred nectar sources for the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus plexippus) along the Great Plains migration pathway Possible influence of water level management on nutrient flux in nearshore sediments of Kabetogama Lake, Minnesota, USA Terrestrial wildlife shows limited response in spatiotemporal activity to logging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1