Evaluation of risk factors, clinic pathological aspects and implant characteristics in patients of oral peri-implant malignancies.

IF 1.9 Bioinformation Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.6026/9732063002001164

Siddharam M Patil, Piyush Javiya, Gargi Yumnam, Sonal Tripathi, Swati Tripathi, Naina Pattnaik

{"title":"Evaluation of risk factors, clinic pathological aspects and implant characteristics in patients of oral peri-implant malignancies.","authors":"Siddharam M Patil, Piyush Javiya, Gargi Yumnam, Sonal Tripathi, Swati Tripathi, Naina Pattnaik","doi":"10.6026/9732063002001164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was conducted to carry out retrospective analyses of oral peri-implant malignancy (OPIM) focussing on demographic details, risk factors, habit factors, clinicopathological features and implant features in patient with OPIM. Clinical data and demographic data from 1646 individuals with oral cancer undergoing resection procedures were gathered. Clinical, radiological, histopathological assessments and implant characteristics records of these patients were obtained and assessed. 46 (2.79%) cases were found to diagnose with OPIM. 36 (85.76%) cases of OPIM were found to having implant occlusion with opposing prosthesis. Prosthesis/prosthesis occlusion was observed in 18 (50%) cases, prosthesis/inlay occlusion in 4 (11.12%) cases and prosthesis/prosthesis on implants in 14 (38.88%) cases. The surgical placement of implants and the galvanic currents that flow between prostheses can operate as an irritating or inflammatory cofactor that aids in the development of malignancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8962,"journal":{"name":"Bioinformation","volume":"20 9","pages":"1164-1168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795473/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6026/9732063002001164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to carry out retrospective analyses of oral peri-implant malignancy (OPIM) focussing on demographic details, risk factors, habit factors, clinicopathological features and implant features in patient with OPIM. Clinical data and demographic data from 1646 individuals with oral cancer undergoing resection procedures were gathered. Clinical, radiological, histopathological assessments and implant characteristics records of these patients were obtained and assessed. 46 (2.79%) cases were found to diagnose with OPIM. 36 (85.76%) cases of OPIM were found to having implant occlusion with opposing prosthesis. Prosthesis/prosthesis occlusion was observed in 18 (50%) cases, prosthesis/inlay occlusion in 4 (11.12%) cases and prosthesis/prosthesis on implants in 14 (38.88%) cases. The surgical placement of implants and the galvanic currents that flow between prostheses can operate as an irritating or inflammatory cofactor that aids in the development of malignancies.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

口腔种植体周围恶性肿瘤患者的危险因素、临床病理及种植体特征评价。

本研究旨在回顾性分析口腔种植体周围恶性肿瘤（OPIM）患者的人口学特征、危险因素、习惯因素、临床病理特征和种植体特征。收集了1646例接受切除手术的口腔癌患者的临床数据和人口统计数据。获得并评估这些患者的临床、放射学、组织病理学评估和种植体特征记录。46例（2.79%）诊断为OPIM。36例（85.76%）OPIM患者存在种植体与对侧假体的咬合。假体/假体咬合18例（50%），假体/嵌体咬合4例（11.12%），假体/假体对种植体14例（38.88%）。植入物的手术放置和假体之间流动的电流可以作为刺激或炎症辅助因素，有助于恶性肿瘤的发展。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Bioinformation MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

128