What influences Australian pharmacists' decisions to supply opioids? Results from a survey and randomised controlled factorial experiment

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Drug and alcohol review Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1111/dar.14009
Louisa Picco, Ting Xia, Rose Laing, Elizabeth Grist, Jana Dostal, Suzanne Nielsen
{"title":"What influences Australian pharmacists' decisions to supply opioids? Results from a survey and randomised controlled factorial experiment","authors":"Louisa Picco,&nbsp;Ting Xia,&nbsp;Rose Laing,&nbsp;Elizabeth Grist,&nbsp;Jana Dostal,&nbsp;Suzanne Nielsen","doi":"10.1111/dar.14009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMP) identify medication-related risks to support clinical decision-making. This study aims to report prescription medication refusal rates based on PDMP alerts and determine how PDMP alerts and other characteristics influence pharmacists' decisions to supply opioids.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Pharmacists completed an online survey and randomised controlled factorial experiment. Generalised linear models explored differences in the proportion of refusals by state. Pharmacists indicated their likelihood to supply opioids based on six clinical vignettes. Mixed-effect linear regression models explored the association between vignette and pharmacy-related characteristics and the likelihood to supply opioids.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Data related to 598 pharmacists (<i>n</i> = 3370 vignettes). Jurisdiction was associated with refusals; Western Australian pharmacists had significantly lower odds of refusing supply compared with Victorian pharmacists (odds ratio = 0.186, 95% confidence interval 0.104–0.331). The factorial experiment revealed the strongest predictors of reduced likelihood to supply were the PDMP high dose (β = −2.76, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and multiple prescriber (β = −3.79, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) alerts. Unemployment (β = −0.0421, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), hepatitis C (β = −0.260, <i>p</i> = 0.009), depression (β = −0.301, <i>p</i> = 0.003), high opioid dose (β = −0.259, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and co-prescribed opioids with benzodiazepines (β = −0.478, <i>p</i> = 0.001) resulted in smaller reductions in the likelihood to supply. Older patient age, patient familiarity and rural/remote pharmacies were associated with significant, albeit small increases in the likelihood to supply with respective 0.293-, 0.250- and 0.339-unit increases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Jurisdictional differences in refusal to supply were observed, while PDMP alerts were the strongest predictor of reduced likelihood to supply opioids in the factorial experiment. Unintended consequences of PDMPs including abrupt opioid discontinuation observed elsewhere, should be avoided following the implementation of this supply-side policy in Australia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"44 3","pages":"783-792"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.14009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.14009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMP) identify medication-related risks to support clinical decision-making. This study aims to report prescription medication refusal rates based on PDMP alerts and determine how PDMP alerts and other characteristics influence pharmacists' decisions to supply opioids.

Methods

Pharmacists completed an online survey and randomised controlled factorial experiment. Generalised linear models explored differences in the proportion of refusals by state. Pharmacists indicated their likelihood to supply opioids based on six clinical vignettes. Mixed-effect linear regression models explored the association between vignette and pharmacy-related characteristics and the likelihood to supply opioids.

Results

Data related to 598 pharmacists (n = 3370 vignettes). Jurisdiction was associated with refusals; Western Australian pharmacists had significantly lower odds of refusing supply compared with Victorian pharmacists (odds ratio = 0.186, 95% confidence interval 0.104–0.331). The factorial experiment revealed the strongest predictors of reduced likelihood to supply were the PDMP high dose (β = −2.76, p < 0.001) and multiple prescriber (β = −3.79, p < 0.001) alerts. Unemployment (β = −0.0421, p < 0.001), hepatitis C (β = −0.260, p = 0.009), depression (β = −0.301, p = 0.003), high opioid dose (β = −0.259, p = 0.002) and co-prescribed opioids with benzodiazepines (β = −0.478, p = 0.001) resulted in smaller reductions in the likelihood to supply. Older patient age, patient familiarity and rural/remote pharmacies were associated with significant, albeit small increases in the likelihood to supply with respective 0.293-, 0.250- and 0.339-unit increases.

Discussion and Conclusions

Jurisdictional differences in refusal to supply were observed, while PDMP alerts were the strongest predictor of reduced likelihood to supply opioids in the factorial experiment. Unintended consequences of PDMPs including abrupt opioid discontinuation observed elsewhere, should be avoided following the implementation of this supply-side policy in Australia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Thank you to our independent reviewers for 2024 Patterns of opioid prescribing to opioid-naive patients after surgical and emergency care: A population-based cross-sectional study using linked administrative databases in Nova Scotia (2017-2019). Risk communication about high-dose MDMA: Impact of a hypothetical drug alert on future MDMA use. Measuring recovery among people who have completed residential rehabilitation: Factor structure and scoring of the substance use recovery evaluator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1