Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory.

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Frontiers in Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-01-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnut.2024.1491544
Xinzhang Sun, Ying Lu, Chengping Jian, Hanqing Zhang
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory.","authors":"Xinzhang Sun, Ying Lu, Chengping Jian, Hanqing Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fnut.2024.1491544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthorexia nervosa refers to an unhealthy preoccupation with maintaining a perfect diet, which is marked by highly restrictive eating habits, rigid food rituals, and the avoidance of foods perceived as unhealthy or impure. In recent years, the Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory (ONI) has gained recognition as a promising tool for assessing orthorexia tendencies and behaviors, addressing the limitations of existing ON-specific measures. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the ONI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 717 participants (Mage = 20.11 years, 78.66% female) completed the Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory (ONI) alongside the Chinese version of the Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale (C-DOS). The ONI was translated into Chinese using the Brislin traditional translation model, following formal authorization from the original author. This translation process included literal translation, back translation, and cultural adaptation to ensure both linguistic and contextual fidelity. Item analysis was employed to assess item differentiation. Scale reliability was determined by measuring internal consistency. Furthermore, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to investigate and confirm the underlying factor structure and overall validity of the scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Chinese version of the Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory (ONI) consists of 24 items across three dimensions. The overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.956, indicating excellent internal consistency. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the individual dimensions were 0.894, 0.933, and 0.848, respectively, demonstrating high reliability for each dimension. Additionally, McDonald's <i>ω</i> was 0.957 for the entire scale, reflecting strong stability in internal consistency, with individual dimensions having McDonald's <i>ω</i> coefficients of 0.895, 0.934, and 0.854. The Spearman-Brown split-half reliability coefficient was 0.931, and McDonald's ω for the split-half reliability was also 0.931, indicating excellent consistency across the scale's two halves. The test-retest reliability was 0.987, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.978 to 0.993, suggesting excellent stability over time and strong consistency across different measurement points. All model fit indices fell within acceptable ranges, affirming the structural validity of the Chinese version. The results from both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses further supported this conclusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study successfully translated and culturally adapted the ONI into Chinese, followed by a comprehensive evaluation of its psychometric properties. The findings demonstrate that the Chinese version of the ONI possesses strong reliability and validity. In the context of varying cultural backgrounds and dietary habits, this scale serves as a valid tool for assessing and screening the Chinese ON population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12473,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nutrition","volume":"11 ","pages":"1491544"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1491544","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Orthorexia nervosa refers to an unhealthy preoccupation with maintaining a perfect diet, which is marked by highly restrictive eating habits, rigid food rituals, and the avoidance of foods perceived as unhealthy or impure. In recent years, the Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory (ONI) has gained recognition as a promising tool for assessing orthorexia tendencies and behaviors, addressing the limitations of existing ON-specific measures. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the ONI.

Methods: A total of 717 participants (Mage = 20.11 years, 78.66% female) completed the Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory (ONI) alongside the Chinese version of the Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale (C-DOS). The ONI was translated into Chinese using the Brislin traditional translation model, following formal authorization from the original author. This translation process included literal translation, back translation, and cultural adaptation to ensure both linguistic and contextual fidelity. Item analysis was employed to assess item differentiation. Scale reliability was determined by measuring internal consistency. Furthermore, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to investigate and confirm the underlying factor structure and overall validity of the scale.

Results: The Chinese version of the Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory (ONI) consists of 24 items across three dimensions. The overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.956, indicating excellent internal consistency. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the individual dimensions were 0.894, 0.933, and 0.848, respectively, demonstrating high reliability for each dimension. Additionally, McDonald's ω was 0.957 for the entire scale, reflecting strong stability in internal consistency, with individual dimensions having McDonald's ω coefficients of 0.895, 0.934, and 0.854. The Spearman-Brown split-half reliability coefficient was 0.931, and McDonald's ω for the split-half reliability was also 0.931, indicating excellent consistency across the scale's two halves. The test-retest reliability was 0.987, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.978 to 0.993, suggesting excellent stability over time and strong consistency across different measurement points. All model fit indices fell within acceptable ranges, affirming the structural validity of the Chinese version. The results from both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses further supported this conclusion.

Conclusion: This study successfully translated and culturally adapted the ONI into Chinese, followed by a comprehensive evaluation of its psychometric properties. The findings demonstrate that the Chinese version of the ONI possesses strong reliability and validity. In the context of varying cultural backgrounds and dietary habits, this scale serves as a valid tool for assessing and screening the Chinese ON population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中文版正畸神经症量表的跨文化适应与心理测量特征。
背景:神经性厌食症是指对保持完美饮食的不健康的关注,其特征是高度限制的饮食习惯,严格的食物仪式,以及避免被认为是不健康或不纯净的食物。近年来,Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory (ONI)已被公认为评估Orthorexia倾向和行为的有前途的工具,解决了现有on特异性测量的局限性。本研究旨在评估中文版ONI的心理测量特性。方法:共717名参与者(年龄: = 20.11 岁,78.66%为女性)完成了正畸神经性量表(ONI)和中文版的塞尔多夫正畸量表(C-DOS)。ONI在获得原作者正式授权后,采用布里斯林传统翻译模式翻译成中文。这个翻译过程包括直译、回译和文化适应,以确保语言和语境的忠实。采用项目分析法评估项目差异。量表信度通过测量内部一致性来确定。此外,通过探索性和验证性因子分析,对量表的潜在因子结构和整体效度进行调查和确认。结果:中文版正畸神经症量表(ONI)由24个项目组成。量表总体Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.956,内部一致性较好。各维度的Cronbach’s alpha系数分别为0.894、0.933和0.848,表明各维度具有较高的信度。整个量表的McDonald's ω为0.957,内部一致性稳定性强,个别维度的McDonald's ω系数分别为0.895、0.934和0.854。Spearman-Brown分半信度系数为0.931,McDonald's ω的分半信度也为0.931,表明量表的两半具有良好的一致性。重测信度为0.987,95%置信区间为0.978 ~ 0.993,时间稳定性好,不同测点间一致性强。所有模型拟合指标均在可接受范围内,证实了中文版的结构有效性。探索性和验证性因子分析的结果进一步支持了这一结论。结论:本研究成功地将ONI翻译成中文,并对其心理测量特性进行了综合评价。研究结果表明,中文版的ONI具有很强的信度和效度。在不同文化背景和饮食习惯的背景下,该量表可作为评估和筛选中国ON人群的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Nutrition
Frontiers in Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
2891
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: No subject pertains more to human life than nutrition. The aim of Frontiers in Nutrition is to integrate major scientific disciplines in this vast field in order to address the most relevant and pertinent questions and developments. Our ambition is to create an integrated podium based on original research, clinical trials, and contemporary reviews to build a reputable knowledge forum in the domains of human health, dietary behaviors, agronomy & 21st century food science. Through the recognized open-access Frontiers platform we welcome manuscripts to our dedicated sections relating to different areas in the field of nutrition with a focus on human health. Specialty sections in Frontiers in Nutrition include, for example, Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition & Sustainable Diets, Nutrition and Food Science Technology, Nutrition Methodology, Sport & Exercise Nutrition, Food Chemistry, and Nutritional Immunology. Based on the publication of rigorous scientific research, we thrive to achieve a visible impact on the global nutrition agenda addressing the grand challenges of our time, including obesity, malnutrition, hunger, food waste, sustainability and consumer health.
期刊最新文献
Mood food: antidepressant effects of culinary spices. The multi-target protective effects of quercetin in cerebrovascular diseases: a dietary strategy for endothelial repair and neuroprotection. Editorial: Applications of metabolomics in the formation of food flavor. Eating behaviors in transmasculine and transfeminine adults assessed by the three factor eating questionnaire. Mosla chinensis maxim. essential oil ameliorates DSS-induced colitis and enhances the intestinal barrier via the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1