Analytical and clinical evaluations of Snibe Maglumi® S100B assay.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-10 Print Date: 2025-06-26 DOI:10.1515/cclm-2024-1508
Samy Kahouadji, Laure Picard, Valentin Bailly Defrance, Bruno Pereira, Damien Bouvier, Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois, Vincent Sapin
{"title":"Analytical and clinical evaluations of Snibe Maglumi<sup>®</sup> S100B assay.","authors":"Samy Kahouadji, Laure Picard, Valentin Bailly Defrance, Bruno Pereira, Damien Bouvier, Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois, Vincent Sapin","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2024-1508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the analytical performances of Snibe Maglumi<sup>®</sup> S100 assay and compare it with the Roche Elecsys<sup>®</sup> S100B assay in adults with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) focusing on reducing unnecessary cranial computed tomography (CT) scans per Scandinavian and French guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analytical performance of the Maglumi<sup>®</sup> S100 kit was assessed using quality controls from both Snibe and Roche, as well as pooled serums. Clinical performances were assessed using serum from 89 adult mTBI patients presenting to the adult emergency department of Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14-15. CT scans were performed according to the Elecsys<sup>®</sup> S100 measurement, with a decision threshold of 0.10 μg/L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeatability and reproducibility coefficients of variation determined using Elecsys<sup>®</sup> S100B, Maglumi<sup>®</sup> S100 controls and pooled serums were below 8 %. Six (7 %) mTBI patients included had clinically relevant intracranial lesions observed on CT scan (CT+), and eighty-three (93 %) patients had no lesions (CT-). S100B medians in CT- and CT+ patients were significantly different: 0.125 (0.085-0.219) vs. 0.368 (0.231-0.489) (p=0.006) for Elecsys<sup>®</sup>, and 0.073 (0.046-0.140) vs. 0.327 (0.230-0.353) for Maglumi<sup>®</sup> (p=0.004). The areas under the ROC curves for intracranial lesion detection were similar: 0.82 (0.73-0.91; p=0.0084) and 0.83 (0.75-0.92; p=0.0063) for Elecsys<sup>®</sup> and Maglumi<sup>®</sup>, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Maglumi<sup>®</sup> S100B assay can be used in the management of mTBI patients to exclude unnecessary CT scans. Further studies are needed to validate a clinical decision threshold for CT scan decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1376-1382"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-1508","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the analytical performances of Snibe Maglumi® S100 assay and compare it with the Roche Elecsys® S100B assay in adults with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) focusing on reducing unnecessary cranial computed tomography (CT) scans per Scandinavian and French guidelines.

Methods: Analytical performance of the Maglumi® S100 kit was assessed using quality controls from both Snibe and Roche, as well as pooled serums. Clinical performances were assessed using serum from 89 adult mTBI patients presenting to the adult emergency department of Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14-15. CT scans were performed according to the Elecsys® S100 measurement, with a decision threshold of 0.10 μg/L.

Results: Repeatability and reproducibility coefficients of variation determined using Elecsys® S100B, Maglumi® S100 controls and pooled serums were below 8 %. Six (7 %) mTBI patients included had clinically relevant intracranial lesions observed on CT scan (CT+), and eighty-three (93 %) patients had no lesions (CT-). S100B medians in CT- and CT+ patients were significantly different: 0.125 (0.085-0.219) vs. 0.368 (0.231-0.489) (p=0.006) for Elecsys®, and 0.073 (0.046-0.140) vs. 0.327 (0.230-0.353) for Maglumi® (p=0.004). The areas under the ROC curves for intracranial lesion detection were similar: 0.82 (0.73-0.91; p=0.0084) and 0.83 (0.75-0.92; p=0.0063) for Elecsys® and Maglumi®, respectively.

Conclusions: The Maglumi® S100B assay can be used in the management of mTBI patients to exclude unnecessary CT scans. Further studies are needed to validate a clinical decision threshold for CT scan decisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Snibe Maglumi®S100B检测的分析和临床评价。
目的:评估Snibe Maglumi®S100检测在成人轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)中的分析性能,并将其与罗氏Elecsys®S100B检测进行比较,重点是根据斯堪的纳维亚和法国指南减少不必要的颅脑CT扫描。方法:使用来自Snibe和Roche的质量控制以及汇集的血清来评估Maglumi®S100试剂盒的分析性能。临床表现评估使用克莱蒙费朗大学医院成人急诊科89名成人mTBI患者的血清,格拉斯哥昏迷评分为14-15分。根据Elecsys®S100测量值进行CT扫描,判断阈值为0.10 μg/L。结果:使用Elecsys®S100B、Maglumi®S100对照和合并血清测定变异的重复性和再现系数均低于8 %。6例(7 %)mTBI患者在CT扫描(CT+)上观察到与临床相关的颅内病变,83例(93 %)患者未见颅内病变(CT-)。CT-和CT+患者的S100B中位数差异显著:Elecsys®患者的S100B中位数为0.125(0.085-0.219)比0.368 (0.231-0.489)(p=0.006), Maglumi®患者的S100B中位数为0.073(0.046-0.140)比0.327 (0.230-0.353)(p=0.004)。颅内病变检测的ROC曲线下面积相似:0.82 (0.73-0.91;P =0.0084)和0.83 (0.75-0.92;p=0.0063),分别为Elecsys®和Maglumi®。结论:Maglumi®S100B检测可用于mTBI患者的管理,以排除不必要的CT扫描。需要进一步的研究来验证CT扫描决策的临床决策阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
期刊最新文献
Feasibility of improving sLe(a)/CA 19-9 harmonization by recalibration: a simulation study using three EQA programs. A seven-year review of the RCPAQAP dried bloodspot external quality assurance program. The prevalence and etiology of macro-growth hormone (GH). IgD-λ multiple myeloma with hidden light chain on immunofixation electrophoresis: a clinical case. A simplified multitarget stool test for colorectal cancer and advanced precancerous lesion detection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1