Analysis of the surprise question as a tool for predicting death in neonates.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS European Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1007/s00431-024-05879-8
Silvia Asenjo, Aleix Soler-Garcia, Ana Morillo-Palomo, Anna Habimana-Jordana, Montserrat Guillen, Catalina Bolancé, Sergi Navarro-Vilarrubí
{"title":"Analysis of the surprise question as a tool for predicting death in neonates.","authors":"Silvia Asenjo, Aleix Soler-Garcia, Ana Morillo-Palomo, Anna Habimana-Jordana, Montserrat Guillen, Catalina Bolancé, Sergi Navarro-Vilarrubí","doi":"10.1007/s00431-024-05879-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Surprise Question \"Would you be surprised if the patient died in the next 12 months?\" lacks pediatric research, particularly in neonatal patients. Our study aims to analyze the Surprise Question's predictive ability in neonates and explore pediatricians' views on palliative care patient identification. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from February 2021 to June 2023, including all newborns admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a pediatric tertiary hospital and its pediatricians. Patients with less than a year since admission were excluded from final analyses. Recorded variables included patient demographics and condition, pediatricians' profile and opinions regarding the Surprise Question, and palliative care patient identification. The Surprise Question was formulated to one or more pediatricians per neonate at admission, 7 days of life, and 28 days of life, with patient status recorded after 12 months to elaborate a confusion matrix of prognostic test results. A total of 51 pediatricians participated. Most felt they had limited criteria for identifying palliative care patients (55%), believed the Surprise Question could be useful (77%), and predicted death (75%). The Surprise Question was answered at least in one out of the three moments for 262 neonates (61% male and at least 36% preterm), with sufficient sample at each moment to study its predictive ability. High negative predictive values were consistent, with higher positive predictive value at 7 days (26%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Surprise Question is a promising tool for predicting neonatal outcome and could guide professionals in initiating palliative care discussions. The 7-day mark appears more suitable for this application.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Previous research has established the Surprise Question as a valuable tool for predicting death in adults. However, limited research exists on its use in pediatric patients and its role remains unexplored in the neonatal period.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• The study evaluates the Surprise Question as a tool for predicting death within the first year of life when applied in the neonatal period. It offers insights into its predictive ability and most suitable time for its application. This study sheds light on its applicability in neonatal care, offering a valuable tool for early identification and referral to palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 2","pages":"182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05879-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Surprise Question "Would you be surprised if the patient died in the next 12 months?" lacks pediatric research, particularly in neonatal patients. Our study aims to analyze the Surprise Question's predictive ability in neonates and explore pediatricians' views on palliative care patient identification. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from February 2021 to June 2023, including all newborns admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a pediatric tertiary hospital and its pediatricians. Patients with less than a year since admission were excluded from final analyses. Recorded variables included patient demographics and condition, pediatricians' profile and opinions regarding the Surprise Question, and palliative care patient identification. The Surprise Question was formulated to one or more pediatricians per neonate at admission, 7 days of life, and 28 days of life, with patient status recorded after 12 months to elaborate a confusion matrix of prognostic test results. A total of 51 pediatricians participated. Most felt they had limited criteria for identifying palliative care patients (55%), believed the Surprise Question could be useful (77%), and predicted death (75%). The Surprise Question was answered at least in one out of the three moments for 262 neonates (61% male and at least 36% preterm), with sufficient sample at each moment to study its predictive ability. High negative predictive values were consistent, with higher positive predictive value at 7 days (26%).

Conclusions: The Surprise Question is a promising tool for predicting neonatal outcome and could guide professionals in initiating palliative care discussions. The 7-day mark appears more suitable for this application.

What is known: • Previous research has established the Surprise Question as a valuable tool for predicting death in adults. However, limited research exists on its use in pediatric patients and its role remains unexplored in the neonatal period.

What is new: • The study evaluates the Surprise Question as a tool for predicting death within the first year of life when applied in the neonatal period. It offers insights into its predictive ability and most suitable time for its application. This study sheds light on its applicability in neonatal care, offering a valuable tool for early identification and referral to palliative care.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意外性问题作为预测新生儿死亡工具的分析。
“如果病人在未来12个月内死亡,你会感到惊讶吗?”缺乏儿科研究,特别是在新生儿患者中。本研究旨在分析惊喜问题对新生儿的预测能力,探讨儿科医生对姑息治疗患者识别的看法。从2021年2月至2023年6月进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究,纳入了一家儿科三级医院新生儿重症监护病房的所有新生儿及其儿科医生。入院不到一年的患者被排除在最终分析之外。记录的变量包括患者的人口统计和病情,儿科医生的简介和关于意外问题的意见,以及姑息治疗患者的识别。出人意料的问题是针对每个新生儿在入院时、出生后7天和28天的一名或多名儿科医生制定的,并记录12个月后的患者状态,以详细列出预后测试结果的混淆矩阵。共有51名儿科医生参与。大多数人认为他们识别姑息治疗患者的标准有限(55%),认为惊喜问题可能有用(77%),并预测死亡(75%)。262名新生儿(61%为男性,至少36%为早产儿)在三个时刻中至少有一个时刻回答了“惊喜问题”,每个时刻都有足够的样本来研究其预测能力。较高的阴性预测值与较高的7天阳性预测值一致(26%)。结论:惊喜问题是一个很有前途的预测新生儿结局的工具,可以指导专业人员开始姑息治疗的讨论。7天的标记似乎更适合这个应用程序。已知情况:•先前的研究已经确定,惊喜问题是预测成年人死亡的一个有价值的工具。然而,有限的研究存在于其在儿科患者的使用,其作用仍未探索在新生儿期。新发现:•该研究评估了惊喜问题作为一种工具,当应用于新生儿期时,可以预测生命第一年内的死亡。它提供了洞察其预测能力和最适合的应用时间。本研究阐明了其在新生儿护理中的适用性,为早期识别和转诊到姑息治疗提供了有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
期刊最新文献
Expanding the Coffin-Siris syndrome spectrum: genetic, dysmorphic, and endocrine findings in eight cases. Quality of life of children with short bowel syndrome and their caregivers from the perspective of caregivers: a cross-sectional study in China. Talking to migrant children and adolescents with cancer: development of a multimodal skills training in migrant-sensitive communication for paediatric oncologists. Beyond bronchopulmonary dysplasia: impact of human milk feeding on long-term respiratory morbidity in very preterm infants. Factors associated with fear of feeding in parents of children with neurological disorders: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1